1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Study Subjects
The flow diagram of data collection and procedures. The samples were divided into two parts for molecular biology techniques and culture, respectively. After matching the codes of identification and culture results, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) patients were diagnosed based on the standard. Then, drug-sensitive test (DST) was performed for the NTM patients.
3.2. Mycobacterial Culture and Characterization
3.2.1. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Identification by PCR-Fluorescent Probe and DNA Microarray
3.2.2. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Culture and Drug Susceptibility Testing
3.3. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Species Distribution
| Sample Sources | Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria | Slowly Growing Mycobacteria | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. chelonae/ M. abscessus | M. fortuitum | M. phlei | M. smegmatis | M. intracellulare | M. kansassi | M. avium | M. gordonae | M. gilvum | M. terrae | Total | |
| No. | 64 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 40 | 25 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 169 |
| Sputum | 48 (75.0) | 7 (70.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (50.0) | 24 (60.0) | 12 (48.0) | 15 (93.7) | 6 (75.0) | 2 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 117 (69.2) |
| Bronchoalveolar fluid | 9 (14.1) | 1 (10.0) | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 15 (37.5) | 12 (48.0) | 1 (6.3) | 1 (12.5) | 0 | 0 | 40 (23.7) |
| Pleuroperitoneal fluids | 1 (1.6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.5) | 0 | 0 | 1 (12.5) | 0 | 0 | 3 (1.8) |
| Purulence | 2 (3.1) | 2 (20.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (2.4) |
| Tissue | 3 (4.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (1.8) |
| Urine | 1 (1.6) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (4.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.2) |
4.2. Drug susceptibility Testing of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Strains
| Drugs | Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria | Slowly Growing Mycobacteria | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. chelonae/ M. abscessus | M. fortuitum | M. intracellulare | M. kansassi | M. avium | M. gordonae | M. gilvum | Total | |
| No. | 30 | 5 | 26 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 85 |
| Any drug resistance | ||||||||
| Rfp | 22 (73.3) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (7.7) | 2 (15.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 (31.8) |
| Emb | 28 (93.3) | 3 (60.0) | 3 (11.5) | 1 (7.7) | 0 | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 36 (42.4) |
| Mfx | 10 (33.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 11 (12.9) |
| Am | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 0 | 3 (23.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (4.7) |
| Clr | 4 (13.3) | 2 (40.2) | 0 | 1 (7.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (8.2) |
| Rfb | 11 (36.7) | 0 | 1 (3.9) | 1 (7.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 (15.3) |
| Lzd | 1 (3.3) | 1 (20.0) | 0 | 1 (7.7) | 1 (14.3) | 0 | 0 | 4 (4.7) |
| Lmp/Cln | 30 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | 26 (100.0) | 13 (100.0) | 7 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | 85 (100.0) |
| Azm | 13 (43.3) | 4 (80.0) | 0 | 4 (30.8) | 1 (14.3) | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 23 (27.1) |
| Fox | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 1 (3.9) | 10 (76.9) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 (14.1) |
| Tob | 22 (73.3) | 5 (100.0) | 2 (7.7) | 12 (92.3) | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 2 (100.0) | 46 (54.1) |
| Gfx | 28 (93.3) | 0 | 10 (62.5) | 9 (69.2) | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 49 (57.6) |
| Dox | 23 (76.7) | 4 (80.0) | 15 (57.7) | 10 (76.9) | 1 (14.3) | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 54 (63.4) |
| Min | 20 (66.7) | 4 (80.0) | 14 (53.9) | 5 (38.5) | 3 (42.9) | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 47 (55.3) |
| Smz | 26 (86.7) | 3 (60.0) | 13 (50.0) | 12 (92.3) | 2 (28.6) | 1 (50.0) | 2 (100.0) | 59 (69.4) |
| Monoresistance | ||||||||
| Lmp/Cln | 0 | 0 | 6 (23.1) | 0 | 3 (42.9) | 1 (50.0) | 0 | 10 (11.8) |
| 2 ~ 4 drugs | 5 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | 16 (61.5) | 4 (30.8) | 4 (57.1) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 32 (37.6) |
| 5 ~ 7 drugs | 6 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 3 (11.5) | 5 (38.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 (18.8) |
| 8 ~ 10 drugs | 15 (50.0) | 2 (40.0) | 1 (3.8) | 3 (23.1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (50.0) | 22 (25.9) |
| ≥ 11 drugs | 4 (13.3) | 0 | 0 | 1 (7.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (5.9) |
Abbreviations: Rfp, rifampicin; Emb, ethambutol; Mfx, moxifloxacin; Am, amikacin; Clr, clarithromycin; Rfb, rifabutin; Lzd, linezolid; Lmp/Cln, imipenem and cilastatin; Azm, azithromycin; Fox, cefoxitin; Tob, tobramycin; Gfx, gatifloxacin; Dox, doxycycline; Min, minocycline; Smz, sulfamethoxazole.
aValues are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
4.3. Demographic and Laboratory Characteristics of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Patients
| Total | RGM | SGM | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male, No. (%) | 46 (54.1) | 13 (37.1) | 33 (66.0) | 6.91 | 0.009 b |
| Age, y, median (Q1 ~ Q3) | 53 (31-65) | 48 (32-65) | 55 (30-67) | - | 0.544 c |
| Inpatient days | 50.8 ± 30.2 | 60.7 ± 36.7 | 43.9 ± 22.7 | 2.40 | 0.020 |
| Occupation, No. (%) | |||||
| Famer & worker | 49 (57.6) | 22 (62.9) | 27 (54.0) | 2.920 | 0.232 d |
| Student & office clerk | 19 (22.4) | 9 (25.7) | 10 (20.0) | ||
| Unemployed & retiree | 17 (20.0) | 4 (11.4) | 13 (26.0) | ||
| T-SPOT POS, No. (%) | 33 (38.8) | 20 (57.1) | 13 (26.0) | 8.407 | 0.004 b |
| TB protein chip POS, No. (%) | 37 (43.5) | 19 (54.3) | 18 (36.0) | 2.801 | 0.094 b |
| Diabetes, No. (%) | 7 (8.2) | 2 (5.7) | 5 (10.0) | 0.094 | 0.759 |
| Diagnosis, No. (%) | |||||
| Pulmonary | 78 (91.8) | 30 (85.7) | 48 (96.0) | 1.68 | 0.195 |
| Extrapulmonary | 7 (8.2) | 5 (14.3) | 2 (4.0) | ||
| Radiological features of pulmonary NTM | 78 | 30 | 48 | ||
| Bronchiectasis | 74 (94.9) | 28 (93.3) | 46 (95.8) | 0.237 | 0.626 b |
| Cavity | 26 (33.3) | 11 (36.7) | 15 (31.3) | 0.244 | 0.621 b |
| Nodules | 15 (19.2) | 9 (30) | 6 (12.5) | 3.640 | 0.056 b |
| Consolidation | 6 (7.7) | 2 (6.7) | 4 (8.3) | 0.072 | 0.788 b |
| Collapse/atelectasis | 4 (8.9) | 2 (6.7) | 2, 4.2% | 0.237 | 0.626 b |
| Ground glass opacity | 1 (1.3) | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 1.621 | 0.203 b |
Abbreviations: NTM, nontuberculous mycobacteria; TB, tuberculous mycobacteria; POS, positive; RGM, rapidly growing mycobacteria; SGM, slowly growing mycobacteria.
aValues are expressed as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
b Chi-square test.
c Mann–Whitney U test.
d likelihood ratio Chi-square tested continuity correction test.
