4.1. Virtual Screening and ADME Investigations of Natural Compounds
As previously mentioned, we gathered a total of 61,953 compounds from the ZINC database. The molecules with the lowest docking energies are listed in Appendix 2. Theoretical ADME calculations were also conducted. SwissADME was utilized to calculate ADME features for each of the selected compounds, and these are presented in Appendix 3. SwissADME provides various computational filters, including Lipinski, Ghose et al. (
47), Veber et al. (
48), Egan et al. (
49), and Muegge et al. (
50) rules. None of the listed natural compounds have a synthetic availability rating exceeding ten, making their synthesis relatively straightforward.
For each of the suggested compounds, the estimated octanol/water partition coefficient (log Po/w), a standard indicator of lipophilicity, was accurately determined. The optimal range for log Po/w falls between -0.4 to +5.6 (
51,
52). The permissible range for the topological polar surface area (TPSA) is 20 to 130 Å
2, and predicting absorption and brain access relies on TPSA (
52). Each chemical in our study falls within an appropriate TPSA range. The calculated ABS values for the designed compounds are within acceptable limits. Notably, the docking energy for ZINC98363781 and ZINC04090499 was -14.1 and -12.7 kcal mol
-1, respectively, while the positive control, captopril, exhibited an energy of -10.8 kcal mol
-1. Based on the docking energies and ADME features, ZINC98363781 and ZINC04090499 were selected as the most promising molecules.
4.2. Investigation of the Active Site of VIM-2 MBL After Molecular Docking
Appendix 4 displays 2D schematics of the selected hits. In Appendix 4A, a single hydrogen bond (H-bond) is observed between captopril and Zn
2+. VIM-2 MBL forms four H-bonds with ZINC98363781, involving residues Val211, Asn210, and Zn
2+ (Appendix 4B). Notably, in contrast to captopril, ZINC98363781 engages in two H-bond interactions with Zn
2+ ions. Appendix 4C reveals three H-bonds between Zn
2+ ions and ZINC04090499. Additionally, ZINC04090499 forms four H-bonds, including two with His179 and two with Arg205. Zn
2+ ions play a pivotal role in MBL catalysis, initiating catalysis through their binding to the β-lactam ring. For MBL catalysis, it is well-established that the β-lactam molecule bonds with Zn1 via the carbonyl oxygen and the carboxyl group on the 5- or 6-membered fused ring bonds to Zn2 (
53). Consequently, strong inhibitor binding to Zn
2+ ions can significantly impede MBL activity. The two designed drugs in our study interact with Zn
2+ ions through two or more H-bonds, providing an advantage over the positive control drug, captopril.
4.3. Stability of Studied Systems During MD Simulation
One of the most crucial aspects to evaluate post-MD simulations is the stability of the system. This stability assessment primarily relies on the root mean square deviation (RMSD) value.
Figure 1A displays the RMSD values for all the studied systems. As depicted, in the free MBL system, the RMSD value increased to 2.11 Å at 13,940 ps upon the initiation of the simulation. Subsequently, it reached 1.1 Å at 23,880 ps, followed by a temporary surge to 2.36 Å at 38,200 ps. Afterward, a sharp decline occurred, bringing the RMSD value down to 1.21 Å, only to rise again to 2.43 Å at 43,400 ps into the MD simulation. These fluctuations persisted until 70,000 ps, at which point the system attained a relative equilibrium (
Figure 1A, black line). In contrast, the MBL-captopril system exhibited higher fluctuations in RMSD values compared to the free MBL system (
Figure 1A). It gradually increased from the beginning of the MD simulation until 37,360 ps (2.77 Å), which marked the highest RMSD value in this system. Subsequently, a decrement in the RMSD value was observed, reaching 1.29 Å at 56,050 ps. The next peak in RMSD occurred at 61,590 ps (2.68 Å), followed by a final significant change, resulting in an RMSD value of 1.25 Å at 69,360 ps. Finally, relative equilibrium was established in the MBL-captopril system from 70,000 ps of MD simulation time (
Figure 1A, blue line).
The root mean square deviation value (A); calculated Rg values (B); computed solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) values (C); the root mean square fluctuation value (D) for free metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) (black line), MBL-captopril (blue line), MBL-ZINC98363781 (red line), and MBL-ZINC04090499 (yellow line) systems
Root mean square deviation fluctuations in both MBL-ZINC98363781 and MBL-ZINC04090499 complexes were lower compared to the free MBL and MBL-captopril systems (
Figure 1A). In the MBL-ZINC98363781 complex, the RMSD score reached 2.28 Å at 11,720 ps, after which no significant shifts were observed, indicating equilibrium (
Figure 1A, red line). The MBL-ZINC04090499 system had an RMSD value of 1.86 Å at 6,250 ps. After decreasing to 1.01 Å, it remained relatively stable until 23,780 ps, when it increased to 1.97 Å at 26,880 ps. Subsequently, a few fluctuations led to the highest RMSD value of 2.37 Å at 42,550 ps for MBL-ZINC04090499. Following this, a minor reduction in RMSD occurred, establishing reasonable stability from 50,000 ps until the end of the simulation (
Figure 1A, yellow line).
The average RMSD values for free MBL, MBL-captopril, MBL-ZINC98363781, and MBL-ZINC04090499 were 1.69 ± 0.019, 1.73 ± 0.032, 1.83 ± 0.022, and 1.62 ± 0.023 Å, respectively. Consequently, MBL-ZINC04090499 displayed the lowest RMSD value, indicating the highest stability among all systems. While the average RMSD of the MBL-ZINC98363781 complex was higher than that of the MBL-captopril complex, the fewer RMSD fluctuations in the former indicated a more stable equilibrium compared to MBL-captopril.
Another valuable analysis for assessing system stability is the radius of gyration (Rg), which measures the RMSD between the atoms of an intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) and its center of mass (
54,
55).
Figure 1B illustrates the comparative Rg values for free MBL and ligated MBL systems. The average Rg values were 16.4 Å (free MBL), 16.22 Å (MBL-captopril), 16.43 Å (MBL-ZINC98363781), and 16.27 Å (MBL-ZINC04090499). The average Rg values suggest that the overall structure of VIM-2 MBL remained stable upon binding with captopril and ZINC04090499 molecules. However, the Rg value fluctuations in the MBL-ZINC04090499 complex were less pronounced than those in the MBL-captopril complex. Overall, the Rg values indicate stability across all studied systems. Additionally, the Rg value serves as a feature restricting the energy of the conformational space accessible to the bound molecules.
This perspective is based on the fundamental principle that increasing a protein's buried surface area is necessary for high binding affinity, often achieved by expanding the bound ligand (
56). Therefore, a decrease in solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) may correlate with a decrease in Rg value within a system. For further investigation, the computed SASA values for all studied systems are depicted in
Figure 1C. The average SASA values were 107.37 nm
2 (free MBL), 105.4 nm
2 (MBL-captopril), 106.38 nm
2 (MBL-ZINC98363781), and 104.16 nm
2 (MBL-ZINC04090499). Based on the SASA analysis, the SASA value closely correlates with the Rg value.
Furthermore, a decrease in SASA suggests enhanced protein packing and greater stability (
56). Thus, the SASA data indicate that the MBL-ZINC04090499 complex exhibits the highest stability in this study. Appendix 5 displays the crystal structure of MBL-ZINC98363781 and MBL-ZINC04090499 during the MD simulation for further examination.
4.4. Flexibility of Studied Systems During MD Simulation
Residue flexibility was investigated using the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) for each residue. The
P. aeruginosa VIM-2 MBL enzyme (PDB ID: 4C1E) comprises 231 residues, and the RMSF values for all residues are illustrated in
Figure 1D. In MD simulations, residues with higher RMSF values exhibit greater flexibility, whereas those with lower values demonstrate reduced motion (
57). Each system exhibits five distinct regions in the RMSF plot, each with varying RMSF values.
The first region encompasses residues 34 - 43, where the MBL-ZINC98363781 complex demonstrates the highest RMSF value. Notably, Glu38 exhibits the highest flexibility in the MBL-ZINC98363781 complex with a value of 3.07 Å. The second region encompasses residues 58 - 69, which form the β-hairpin motif. In this region, the MBL-ZINC04090499 system displays the highest RMSF value. Specifically, Asp63 exhibits the highest RMSF value in the MBL-ZINC04090499 complex at 5.27 Å. Interestingly, the RMSF values for Tyr67 in the free MBL and MBL-captopril systems were higher than in the two designed drugs from this study. The next region comprises residues 139 - 150, forming an α-helix.
Ligand binding increases the flexibility of these residues compared to unbound MBL. The fourth region is a loop consisting of residues 158 - 164. Flexibility in this region decreases upon binding of captopril and ZINC04090499 compared to free MBL. However, the binding of ZINC98363781 does not reduce the RMSF value compared to free MBL; in fact, an increase in RMSF is observed in Ser128. Another loop comprises residues 205 - 217, often playing a crucial role in defining protein structure and ligand binding (
58). This loop contains some active site residues (Arg205, Asn210, Ala212, and Asp213).
In this loop, the RMSF value shows the greatest reduction after ZINC04090499 binding compared to ZINC98363781 and captopril. This decrease in flexibility in the active site residues can be attributed to the stronger binding of ZINC04090499 to the MBL active site. The number of hydrogen bonds formed by ZINC04090499 within the active site cavity is higher than the other two ligands (
Figure 2). The hydrogen bond count further supports the stronger binding of the ZINC04090499 compound to the MBL active site, resulting in reduced RMSF values for active site residues.
Intermolecular H-bond for metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-captopril (A); MBL-ZINC98363781 (B); MBL-ZINC04090499 (C); and intramolecular H-bond for four studied systems (D)
4.5. Intramolecular and Intermolecular Hydrogen Bond Calculation
Proteins typically form numerous intramolecular hydrogen bonds between residues, with an average of 1.1 intramolecular hydrogen bonds per residue. Previous studies have shown that intramolecular hydrogen bonds contribute to stabilizing protein structures (
59,
60). The intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonds are depicted in
Figure 2. The average number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds was 172.33, 166.39, 170.8, and 169.65 for the free MBL, MBL-captopril, MBL-ZINC98363781, and MBL-ZINC04090499 systems, respectively. Consequently, more intramolecular hydrogen bonds were observed in the MBL-ZINC98363781 and MBL-ZINC04090499 systems compared to the MBL-captopril complex (
Figure 2D). The presence of additional intramolecular hydrogen bonds suggests enhanced stability in the complexes.
Intermolecular hydrogen bonds formed between the protein and ligands were calculated as intermolecular hydrogen bonds. These hydrogen bonds are crucial for various protein functions, including enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand binding strength, and protein folding (
61-
63).
Figure 2A,
B, and
C reveal that the number of hydrogen bonds between our designed drugs (ZINC04090499 and ZINC98363781) and VIM-2 MBL active site residues is significantly higher than with captopril. Additionally, the number of hydrogen bonds for ZINC04090499 exceeds that of ZINC98363781. The increased quantity of hydrogen bonds indicates greater affinity between ZINC04090499 and ZINC98363781 for VIM-2 MBL compared to captopril.
4.7. FEL
The FEL plot for PC1 and PC2, generated by gmx_anaeig, is presented in
Figure 4. For free MBL, MBL-captopril, MBL-ZINC98363781, and MBL-ZINC04090499, the Gibbs energy values vary from 0 to 12.7, 0 to 12.3, 0 to 12.4, and 0 to 13.5, respectively. A shallow and narrow energy basin indicates low system stability (
60,
65). In the case of MBL-ZINC98363781 and MBL-ZINC04090499, three distinct deep and broad valleys are observed, while the MBL and MBL-captopril systems display a cluster of three energy basins close to each other. MBL-ZINC98363781 exhibits energy levels similar to the MBL-captopril complex, suggesting that these complexes undergo energetically favorable transitions between structures. The binding of ZINC98363781 and captopril to VIM-2 MBL leads to an increase in the global minima (low-energy basins) of VIM-2 MBL during MD simulations, indicating that these systems are thermodynamically more favorable than free MBL and the MBL-ZINC04090499 complexes.
Free energy landscape (FEL) calculation of free metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) (A); MBL-captopril (B); MBL-ZINC98363781 (C); and MBL-ZINC04090499 (D) systems. The deeper blue spots indicate the principal components where the energy is minimum, and the red spots indicate the principal components where the energy is maximum.
4.8. Free Binding Energy Computed by MM-PBSA Method
Following the simulations, MM-PBSA was utilized to calculate the binding free energy of the compounds (
Table 1). The results indicate that the binding free energies of captopril, ZINC98363781, and ZINC04090499 are, respectively, -29.39 ± 5.92 kcal mol
-1, -79.74 ± 67.51 kcal mol
-1, and -99.65 ± 26.52 kcal mol
-1 (
Table 1). Consequently, the MBL-ZINC04090499 complex exhibits the lowest binding free energy. Additionally, only the MBL-ZINC04090499 complex has a solvent-accessible surface area energy greater than the MBL-captopril complex. In comparison to the MBL-captopril complex, the MBL-ZINC04090499 complex displays lower electrostatic energy. Furthermore, ZINC98363781 also exhibits lower free binding energy than captopril.
| Energy (kcal mol-1) | MBL-Captopril | MBL-ZINC98363781 | MBL-ZINC04090499 |
|---|
| ∆Evdwa | -155.39 ± 4.81 | -77.62 ± 48.81 | -199.58 ± 53.09 |
| ∆Eelectb | -64.77 ± 7.35 | -58.08 ± 44.18 | -68.06 ± 18.46 |
| ∆Esolvc | 210.69 ± 15.17 | 64.05 ± 57.68 | 180.17 ± 52.46 |
| ∆ESASAd | -19.92 ± 0.27 | -8.09 ± 5.10 | -12.18 ± 5.72 |
| ∆Gbinding | -29.39 ± 5.92 | -79.74 ± 67.51 | -99.65 ± 26.52 |
a Solvent-accessible surface area energy.
b Polar solvation energy.
c Electrostatic energy.
d Van der Waal energy.
4.9. VIM-2 MBL Inhibition by ZINC04090499
To assess and compare the inhibitory potency of ZINC04090499 with our previously identified compound, ZINC517765 (
29), assays were conducted to determine the IC
50 values of both compounds. Experimental assays revealed that ZINC04090499 has an IC
50 value of 25 μM, indicating a stronger inhibitory effect on VIM-2 MBL compared to ZINC517765, which has an IC
50 value exceeding 100 μM. This significant difference underscores ZINC04090499's enhanced efficiency in reducing the enzyme's activity by 50%, emphasizing its potential as a potent therapeutic agent. ZINC04090499 contains an indole group linked to butyroyl aspartic acid. The indole moiety's stable, planar structure facilitates strong π-π interactions and hydrogen bonding. The aspartic acid component adds a carboxylic acid functional group, forming strong ionic interactions and hydrogen bonds crucial for binding to metal ions in metalloenzymes like MBLs. In contrast, ZINC517765 consists of two furan rings connected by a methylene bridge, with each furan ring bearing a carboxylic acid group. Furan rings are smaller and less planar than indole, potentially leading to weaker π-π interactions.
4.10. Conclusions
The development of BLs inhibitors represents a potent strategy to safeguard β-lactam antibiotics from BLs. Recently, reports have indicated an increased presence of
P. aeruginosa in the bodies of COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that ciprofloxacin-resistant
P. aeruginosa in lung abscesses of COVID-19 patients complicates their treatment (
66). In this context, we propose a potent inhibitor targeting
P. aeruginosa VIM-2 MBL through a combination of computational and experimental studies.
In our study, two compounds, namely ZINC98363781 and ZINC04090499, were selected based on molecular docking studies, and further investigations were conducted on both molecules. Ultimately, we recommend ZINC04090499, a natural substance, as a VIM-2 MBL inhibitor based on the results of MD simulations. The docking energy of ZINC04090499 when binding to the VIM-2 MBL active site is lower (-12.7 kcal mol-1) compared to the positive control (-10.8 kcal mol-1). Furthermore, in comparison to the captopril complex, the suggested inhibitor complex exhibits a reduced RMSD value.
Enzyme assays were conducted to compare the inhibitory effects of ZINC04090499 and ZINC517765. The experimental results align with the predictions of our computational simulations. ZINC04090499, with its larger and more complex structure featuring an indole ring and aspartic acid, may confer stronger and more specific interactions with MBLs, thereby leading to more effective inhibition compared to ZINC517765, which is smaller and based on a furan structure.
According to the MD data, the presence of ZINC04090499 in the VIM-2 MBL active cavity results in a reduction in Rg. This decrease may be attributed to the enhancement of intramolecular H-bonds within the protein following ZINC04090499 binding. In contrast to the unbound MBL and the MBL-captopril complex, the RMSF decreases following ZINC04090499 binding.
Moreover, the number of H-bonds formed between VIM-2 MBL and ZINC04090499 is higher than that with captopril, indicating a strong binding of ZINC04090499 to the active site. The atomic motions were evaluated using the PCA method. Based on the PCA data, the MBL-ZINC04090499 system exhibits reasonable stability compared to the MBL-captopril system. In conclusion, the binding free energy determined by MM-PBSA highlights ZINC04090499's potential to inhibit VIM-2 MBL activity. Nevertheless, further in vitro and in vivo tests are required to evaluate its suggested therapeutic utility fully.