The antimicrobial potential of ten often used mouthwashes against four dental caries pathogens

Author(s):
Kamal Rai AnejaKamal Rai Aneja1, Radhika JoshiRadhika Joshi2,*, Chetan SharmaChetan Sharma1
1Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, India
2Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, [email protected], India
*Corresponding Author: Department of Microbiology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra-136119, [email protected], India. Email: [email protected]

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology:Vol. 3, issue 1; 15-27
Published online:Jan 31, 2010
Article type:Research Article
Received:Nov 01, 2009
Accepted:Jan 01, 2010
How to Cite:Aneja KR, Joshi R, Sharma C. The antimicrobial potential of ten often used mouthwashes against four dental caries pathogens. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010;3(1):. doi:

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Increasing number of people are using mouthwashes for general and oral health care. Few of these mouthwashes, however, have undergone rigorous testing, as evidenced by the limited amount of information on their safety and efficacy in the literature. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial properties of ten commonly available mouthwashes against four oral pathogens related to caries and to oral fungal infections, to verify the claims made by the manufacturers to provide information to dental professionals about the efficacy of their products in vitro and to use these mouthwashes as a base for the evaluation of antimicrobial plant products.

Materials and methods: The authors used two different techniques: microbial growth in nutrient broth by turbidity measurement and an agar well diffusion method to evaluate the antimicrobial effectiveness of ten often used mouthwashes against four microorganisms: Streptococcus mutans and Staphylococcus aureus (bacteria), Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (fungi). Nutrient broth without mouthwash and sterile distilled water served as the control respectively in the two techniques.

Results: Hexidine mouthwash emerged as the most effective mouthwash [maximum mean diameter of inhibition zone against S. aureus (28.3mm to 33.9mm) followed by S. mutans (23.6mm to 26mm), S. cerevisiae (20.6mm to 26.3mm) and minimum against C. albicans (11.9mm to 22.9mm)] followed by Chlohex and Triguard, all of which had excellent level of activity. Following Triguard were Zytee, Chlohexplus, Hexnor and Chlorhexidine that showed good antimicrobial activity and finally, displaying very little antimicrobial activity was Listerine while Toss-K and Senquel-AD totally lacked antimicrobial activity.

Conclusion: Hexidine mouthwash (ICPA Health Products Ltd., Ankleshwar, India) showed excellent antimicrobial activity against the four dental caries causing microorganisms in vitro. The six mouthwashes found to be effective against all the four tested microorganisms at all the four concentrations, comprising of Chlorhexidine gluconate as the basic constituent, presented different antimicrobial activities.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2010, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

20
Feb
2015

Comparison of the Antibacterial Properties of Three Mouthwashes Containing Chlorhexidine Against Oral Microbial Plaques: An in vitro Study

Hojatollah Yousefimanesh,
Mansour Amin,
Maryam Robati,
Hamed Goodarzi,
Masumeh Otoufi

Yousefimanesh H, Amin M, Robati M, Goodarzi H, Otoufi M. Comparison of the Antibacterial Properties of Three Mouthwashes Containing Chlorhexidine Against Oral Microbial Plaques: An in vitro Study. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(2):e17341. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.17341

28
Oct
2024
Arch Clin Infect Dis

Comparative Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Fluorine Total Mouthwashes Against Candida albicans and Streptococcus sanguinis

Kasra Ghafari,
Reyhaneh Shoorgashti,
Simin Lesan,
Maryam Rezaei,
Taraneh Farrokhnia

Ghafari K, Shoorgashti R, Lesan S, Rezaei M, Farrokhnia T. Comparative Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Fluorine Total Mouthwashes Against Candida albicans and Streptococcus sanguinis. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2024;19(5):e154742. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-154742

20
Dec
2017
Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Probiotic Mouthwash with Chlorhexidine Against Common Oral Pathogens: An In-Vitro Study

Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Probiotic Mouthwash with Chlorhexidine Against Common Oral Pathogens: An In-Vitro Study

Afrooz Saadatzadeh,
Abdolghani Ameri,
Eskandar Moghimipour,
Behzad Bahmani,
Sahar Gholipour

Saadatzadeh A, Ameri A, Moghimipour E, Bahmani B, Gholipour S. Comparison of Antibacterial Efficacy of Probiotic Mouthwash with Chlorhexidine Against Common Oral Pathogens: An In-Vitro Study. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2018;13(1):e65029. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.65029

20
May
2015

Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Brazilian Propolis With Chlorhexidine and Sodium Fluoride Against Common Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study

Charu Mohan Marya,
Meenakshi Chopra,
Sukhvinder Singh Oberoi,
Ruchi Nagpal,
Chandan Dhingra

Marya CM, Chopra M, Oberoi SS, Nagpal R, Dhingra C. Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Brazilian Propolis With Chlorhexidine and Sodium Fluoride Against Common Oral Pathogens: An In Vitro Study. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2015;10(2):e19069. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-19069

1
Dec
2014

Comparison of the in vitro Effect of Chemical and Herbal Mouthwashes on Candidaalbicans

Somayeh Talebi,
Azar Sabokbar,
Majid Riazipour,
Mohsen Saffari

Talebi S, Sabokbar A, Riazipour M, Saffari M. Comparison of the in vitro Effect of Chemical and Herbal Mouthwashes on Candidaalbicans. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(12):e12563. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.12563

Download PDF247.95 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles