Bites and stings are among the most significant health-related problems, imposing substantial costs on the healthcare system each year. Snakebites, as a considerable public health challenge, are often overlooked, especially in rural communities across tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Despite the high prevalence of these incidents, precise epidemiological data on snakebites have not been provided (
20). Recent findings indicate that global warming is leading to an increase in the number of venomous snakebites (
21). A recent study shows that for every degree Celsius increase in daily temperature, the incidence of snakebites rises by nearly six percent. Researchers have stated that climate change contributes to increased activity among cold-blooded animals, such as snakes (
22). Considering the climatic conditions of Ahvaz city and the high temperatures during the hot seasons that increase the activity of venomous cold-blooded animals (
23,
24), this study investigates the epidemiology of snakebites among adult patients visiting Razi Hospital and pediatric patients visiting Abouzar Hospital in Ahvaz during the summer of 2019.
As presented in the results section, the majority of snakebite cases in our study were among adults (75.6%). The victims were aged between 2 and 84 years, with a mean age of 26.92 years. The mean ages for adults and children were reported to be 33.92 ± 12.54 years and 7.40 ± 3.67 years, respectively. In the study by Levine et al., out of a total of 420 snakebite cases that occurred between 2013 and 2017, only 22.4% of the patients were children. This finding is consistent with the present study, which reported that adults were the age group most likely to be bitten by snakes (
25).
In a comprehensive study carried out by our research team from 2018 to 2020, we investigated the cases of children suffering from snakebites who were referred to Abouzar Hospital in Ahvaz. The findings revealed that the average age of the victims was 10.73 years, with a standard deviation of 3.41 years (
26). In the descriptive study by Mohammadi Kojidi et al., the mean age of the victims was 43.14 years (
27). This figure is higher than the mean age obtained in our study, possibly because only patients from Rasht city were included in their study. In our study, the lower mean age may be attributed to the high incidence of snakebites among rural children.
In alignment with the current study, the research by Esmaeil et al. noted that the majority (34.3%) of snakebite victims were in the age group of 20 - 29 years (
28). In the study by Tekin et al., 42.4% of snakebite victims were children (
3), whereas this figure was 24.4% in the present study. In the study by Zamani-Alavijeh et al., the mean age of patients was reported as 28.26 ± 0.36 years, with the highest frequency of bites occurring in the 21 - 30 year age group (27%) and the lowest in individuals over 80 years old (less than 1%) (
29).
In Brazil, Feitosa’s study identified that the majority of snakebite victims fell within the age group of 16 to 45 years (
30). Conversely, a study by Mohapatra et al. in India found that the peak incidence of snakebites occurred among individuals aged 15 to 29 years (
31). Meanwhile, Tekin and his team in Turkey categorized most of their patients as adults (
3). These observations align with the results of the current study.
In our study, males constituted 74.4% of victims, consistent with prior studies, which reported 71% in Mohammadi Kojidi et al. (
27) and 60.5% in Kshirsagar et al. (
32). However, Zamani-Alavijeh et al. (
29) reported a lower proportion of 45%, potentially reflecting regional demographic differences. The study by Feitosa et al. indicated that 79% of snakebite victims were male (
30). Mohapatra et al.’s study observed a lower figure of 59%, although men still experienced a higher prevalence of snakebites compared to women (
31). Similarly, Tekin et al.’s study reported that 64% of the patients were male (
3). The results obtained in our study align with the general findings regarding the higher incidence of snakebites among males. However, the observed differences in the age and gender distribution of victims may be attributed to various factors, including climatic, cultural, and employment variations between men and women in the studied community.
In the present study, most of the victims resided in rural areas of the province. The total number of rural residents was 66 individuals (73.3%), including 46 adults (69.7%) and 20 children (30.3%). In the study by Esmaeil et al., all cases occurred in rural areas, which aligns with the higher incidence of snakebites among rural residents found in the current study (
28). In contrast, Zamani-Alavijeh et al. reported that 93.3% of snakebite cases occurred in urban areas, with most (99.7%) occurring at home (
29). Furthermore, both Feitosa et al. (
30) and Mohapatra et al. (
31) noted that the highest rates of snakebites occurred in rural areas, with the latter study highlighting that rural areas accounted for 97% of snakebite-related fatalities.
Factors contributing to the high incidence of snakebites among rural children in this study include increased activity levels in this age group and their curiosity and risk-taking behaviors, such as moving rocks and playing near snake habitats. Moreover, in rural areas, safety measures such as wearing gloves and checking shoes before putting them on are often overlooked. It is more likely for children to walk barefoot or not wear appropriate footwear (
33). Additionally, contributing factors to snakebites in rural settings include the aging of houses, lack of proper infrastructure, sleeping and resting in open environments, and the absence of beds for sleeping.
In the current study, pain was observed in 36 individuals (40%), swelling in 32 individuals (35.6%), and burning in 14 individuals (15.6%) as the most common initial symptoms among the patients examined. In the study by Soleimani et al. (
34), the main symptoms reported among victims included pain, swelling, hematuria, and abnormalities in liver enzymes, with a prevalence of 57.3% [Soleimani et al. (
34)]. The study by Mohammadi Kojidi et al. noted that the most frequent complications included subcutaneous bleeding (100%) and pain (81%) (
27). In the research by Esmaeil et al., all patients exhibited symptoms of pain, swelling, erythema, and ecchymosis, with 40.3% experiencing severe fatigue (
28). Additionally, research conducted by Adukauskiene et al. revealed that 70% of snakebite patients reported symptoms of pain and swelling (
35).
These discrepancies in findings may stem from factors such as the type of venom from various snake species, the physical resilience of the victims, or the speed of medical response and treatment received. Based on our findings, 98.9% of snakebite cases involved unidentified snake species. This figure was reported as 52.9% in the study by Chew et al. (
36). This finding in our study may be due to the high diversity of snakes in Iran, with many individuals lacking prior encounters or familiarity with snakes. Consequently, identifying the snake species requires an understanding of the ecosystem and prior knowledge of snakes. On the other hand, snakebites often induce significant fear and panic, which can impair the focus of the affected individual, making it challenging to identify the type of snake or even recognize its distinguishing features.
In our study, the time interval from snakebite to hospital visit ranged from 0.3 to 48 hours, with a mean of 10.98 hours. The average time interval for adults seeking medical attention was higher than that for children; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.820). Given the serious complications arising from delays in receiving snakebite treatment, which may include tissue loss due to debridement or surgical removal of necrotic areas (
15), limb amputation (
37), chronic wounds, infection, osteomyelitis, arthritis, severe physical disability (
38-
40), and, depending on the type of snake, renal disorders (
41), cerebral cortex disturbances (
42), chronic neurological deficits (
43), psychiatric disorders such as depression (
44) and seizures (
45), PTSD (
45,
46), and chronic musculoskeletal disabilities such as swelling, muscle atrophy, joint stiffness, decreased muscle strength, balance disorders, and permanent deformities (
47,
48), it is essential to minimize the time interval between the bite and hospital visit (
40).
To this end, implementing educational programs to inform the public about the importance of obtaining prompt treatment following a snakebite is crucial in reducing delays and their consequences. Considering that the majority of cases in this study were from rural areas, the reasons for delays in seeking help may include the remoteness of villages from county centers, inadequate rural roads, lack of available transportation, unawareness of the importance of receiving timely treatment, and financial difficulties faced by rural residents.
The average duration of hospitalization for patients ranged from 1 to 10 days, with a mean of 2.82 days. The mean length of hospitalization for adults was significantly lower than that for children. In our team's prior investigation, we found that the average duration of hospitalization for children who suffered snakebites was 4.05 days, with a standard deviation of 2.13 days (
26). The need for ICU admission was observed in 19 individuals (21.1%). Additionally, it was established that the requirement for ICU admission was significantly higher in adults compared to children. In the study by Lang et al., the median length of stay in the intensive care unit (IQR) was reported as 3 days (
49), comparable to the figures obtained in the present study.
Since snakebites have been a threat for as long as humans have existed, treatments for them have evolved alongside human civilization (
50). In traditional Iranian medicine, initial treatments involved making an incision, scraping, or creating a puncture at the bite site, followed by attempts to suction the venom (
51). However, this method posed a risk to the person administering treatment due to potential poisoning from the venom entering their mouth. Another method involved applying a tourniquet to the affected limb (
52). This practice is both painful and dangerous, as it can lead to ischemia or the development of necrotic wounds. The use of topical chemical substances or herbs was also a common treatment in ancient remedies (
53). However, validating the therapeutic effects of plant materials requires extensive research grounded in modern healthcare practices and global standards.
Cryotherapy, which involves cooling the bite area with ice packs, is another method that carries the risk of exacerbating tissue damage (
54). These traditional methods are often long-term treatments and may not be effective within the critical initial period after a bite. Moreover, some can worsen the damage. While controlled cooling may reduce inflammation (
55), and certain plants contain active compounds that could alleviate snakebite symptoms, these approaches need proper guidelines and validation. Physical venom extraction, if performed before the venom spreads, is a logical approach but requires tools compliant with global standards (
51).
Therefore, regular training and reminders for at-risk populations and clinical staff in Ahvaz are essential to mitigate complications from outdated treatments. Currently, antivenom serum remains the most effective, safe, and reliable treatment.
Based on the current study, the average number of antivenom vials administered ranged from 1 to 24, with a mean of 7.99. The amount of antivenom used in adults did not show a significant difference compared to children. In the study by LoVecchio and DeBus, 50 children who experienced snakebites (87.72%) received antivenom, among whom 19 cases exhibited immediate hypersensitivity reactions (
56). In Lang’s study, antivenom was administered to 12.6% of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit due to snakebites (
49).
Antivenom is a crucial treatment for snakebites, as it contains specific antibodies that neutralize the toxic effects of snake venom. The timely administration of antivenom can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality associated with envenomation. Without proper treatment, snakebites can lead to severe complications such as tissue damage, organ failure, and even death. Antivenom helps to alleviate symptoms, prevent the progression of venom-related injuries, and improve overall patient outcomes. Additionally, it plays a vital role in public health, particularly in regions where snakebites are prevalent, ensuring that affected individuals receive essential medical care and reducing the long-term impacts of snakebite injuries.
In our study, 72 individuals (80%) of all patients received antibiotics. The most commonly prescribed antibiotic was ceftriaxone, which was administered to 53 individuals (58.9%), all of whom were adults. For children, gentamicin/penicillin was used for 10 individuals (52.6%), making it the most prevalent treatment in this age group. Although there are guidelines for managing snakebite envenomation, the use of antibiotics in this context remains controversial. Various studies reported different types of antibiotics utilized in snakebite cases, ranging from beta-lactams to lincosamides and nitroimidazoles, and from monotherapy to combination antimicrobial therapies. Antibiotics should be prescribed cautiously and carefully. Prophylactic use of antibiotics has been reported as prohibited in most studies (
57).
Scientifically, the administration of antibiotics in snakebite cases should be based on the susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from the affected tissue or identified in the snake’s oral cavity (
57,
58). However, this was not feasible in the present study due to the lack of precise identification of snake species and the limited opportunity for identifying microbial species at the wound site. Therefore, the high rate of antibiotic consumption observed in this study was due to precautionary measures taken and the consideration of the potential risk of infection.
The frequency of FFP and dressing was reported in 8 individuals (8.9%) and 3 individuals (3.3%), respectively, with a significant difference between the adult and pediatric groups. Specifically, the frequency of FFP and dressing in children was 31.8% and 13.6%, respectively. In adults, these figures were 1.5% and 0%, respectively. In snakebite incidents without timely intervention, the healing of certain wounds can be challenging and even life-threatening. The WHO has provided official guidelines for managing snakebite wounds with severe complications, such as large blisters and skin necrosis. However, there is no standardized protocol for the emergency management of common snakebite wounds. Moreover, the types of snakes and venom characteristics vary by country and region, leading to diverse wound treatment methods (
598).
Dressings with various active ingredients (
60-
62) and FFP treatment (
63) have been reported in different studies. Fresh frozen plasma is the liquid component of a unit of whole blood frozen within a specified time frame, typically 8 hours. The FFP contains all coagulation factors except platelets, and it does not include red blood cells or leukocytes. Fresh frozen plasma corrects coagulation by replacing or supplementing plasma proteins in patients with deficient or dysfunctional plasma proteins. The standard dosage is 10 to 20 milliliters per kilogram, which increases factor levels by approximately 20% (
64).
In the present study, FFP was not utilized, except for patients who were in emergency conditions and received FFP before being referred to our center. In a study by Holla et al., all 62 patients examined were administered an average of 5 units of FFP, with 6 of these patients experiencing adverse reactions to this treatment. These reactions included chills and pain at the infusion site (
63).
In the present study, the mortality rate was zero. In the study conducted by Kshirsagar et al., a mortality rate of 1.85% was reported among patients who presented late to the hospital (
32). The mortality rate of 8% in the Lang et al. study may be attributed to the fact that their cases were selected from ICU patients (
49).
The findings from our study indicated that most snakebite victims are adults, predominantly males, and individuals residing in rural areas. In many cases, the species of the snake responsible for the bite was unknown. More than one-fifth of the victims required admission to the ICU. Swelling, pain, and a burning sensation were the most common initial symptoms observed in patients. The average duration of hospitalization for adults was significantly shorter than that for children. In one-fifth of the cases, antibiotics were not utilized. Among children, gentamicin/penicillin was the most frequently used treatment, while ceftriaxone was more commonly administered to adults. The frequency of FFP and dressing interventions in children was higher than in adults. No fatalities were reported.
Therefore, it seems that even in areas with limited healthcare systems, prompt hospital visits could allow for patient recovery and minimize complications. Public media campaigns for personal protective education, especially in rural areas, could effectively reduce cases of bites and venomous stings. Moreover, training and retraining healthcare personnel can strengthen prevention and optimal treatment strategies.
Similar studies to the present one have rarely been conducted in Iran, which limits the ability to make accurate comparisons and conclusions. Due to the high rate of unknown snake species, further investigations into the relationship between the treatment used and the species of snake responsible for the bite are necessary. It is essential to plan and implement additional studies with a larger time scale and the consideration of more independent and intervening variables to confirm or refute the present results.
5.1. Strengths and Limitations
This study provides valuable insights into snakebite statistics in Ahvaz, Iran. Concentrating on Ahvaz allows for a detailed examination of snakebite patterns within a particular ecological and healthcare context. This localized approach can yield valuable insights for targeted interventions. The study contributes to the understanding of clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes in a region where snakebites are a significant health concern. Documenting these aspects can aid in developing local clinical guidelines and improving patient care. Despite its limitations, the study adds to the limited body of knowledge on snakebite epidemiology in Iran. The data can be used to inform national-level policies and resource allocation for snakebite prevention and management. Evaluating the types of treatments used and their outcomes, even with incomplete follow-up, can offer preliminary insights into their effectiveness. This information can guide further research and improvements in clinical practice.
Despite these potential strengths, the present study’s conclusions are tempered by certain limitations. The restriction to cases referred to the referral centers introduces a potential selection bias, as it excludes cases managed elsewhere or those that did not seek formal medical care. Additionally, the inability to accurately follow up with patients hinders the determination of long-term complications and the effectiveness of administered treatments. Retrospective data collection on snakebite incidents can be subject to recall bias, affecting the accuracy of reported clinical symptoms and treatment details. Reliance on patient history and records may not fully capture the nuances of each case. The study may not fully detail the range and severity of clinical manifestations due to limitations in data granularity. Variations in venom toxicity among different snake species in the region could lead to a wide array of clinical presentations that may not be fully captured. Complete mortality data may be challenging to obtain, especially for cases that do not present to the study centers.