Cover image of the article: Identification of difference of working memory and sensory processing styles in boys and girls with writing-learning disorder

Image Credit:J Nurs Midwifery Sci

Identification of difference of working memory and sensory processing styles in boys and girls with writing-learning disorder

Authors

Alireza Sangani1,*, Paria Jangi2, Nahid Ramak3, Aniseh Ahmadi4
1Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Ahvaz, Iran
2Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Teaching and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz Branch, Bandargaz, Iran
4Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch, Sari, Iran
*Corresponding Author: First Floor, Sarv Apartments, Alley 24, GorganJadid, Gorgan, Golestan Province, Iran. E-mail: Email: sangany.psycho@gmail.com

Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences:Vol. 6, issue 4; 177-182
Published online:Sep 05, 2019
Article type:Research Article
Received:Mar 09, 2019
Accepted:Jun 09, 2019
How to Cite:Sangani A, Jangi P, Ramak N, Ahmadi A. Identification of difference of working memory and sensory processing styles in boys and girls with writing-learning disorder. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2019;6(4):e140989. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/jnms.jnms_12_19

Abstract

Context: The main problems of children with learning disorder are in memory and their sensory processing and it causes children’s academic performance not appropriate. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate of difference of working memory and sensory processing styles in boys and girls with writing-learning disorder.

Settings and Design: This was a descriptive and analytic study in the summer of 2018 at a learning disorders center in Gorgan City, Iran. Materials and Methods: The study population was all girls and boys by the age of 8–10 years suffering from the writing-learning disorder. The available sampling method was used and 44 boys and 36 girls were chosen. The Dunn profile was obtained from the parents of the children. Daneman and Carpenter working memory, questions were asked from the children directly, and the information related to processing and storage in their memory were received. Furthermore, a demographic questionnaire was used.

Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using in descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and frequency), independent t-test, and multivariate analysis of variance.

Results: There was a significant difference in the writing learning disorder among processing (P < 0.006) and storage (P < 0.000) of working memory subscales and the indoctrination associated with the physical state of the body motion (P < 0.000), multisensory processing (P < 0.000), and auditory processing (P < 0.002), of the sensory processing styles variable in both the girls and boys.

Conclusions: With regard to the results obtained, it can be concluded that the boy’s group is in worse conditions in working memory and sensory processing styles, which requires special attention and more focused educational approaches.

Highlights

Fulltext

Full-text is available in PDF format.

Copyright

© 2019, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

21
Aug
2016
Comparison of working memory in normal and dyslexia children in Semnan primary schools

Comparison of working memory in normal and dyslexia children in Semnan primary schools

ali sadollahi,
Maryam Mokhlesin,
Marziyeh Maddah,
Fatemeh Kasbi,
Masomeh Salmani,
Raheb Ghorbani

sadollahi A, Mokhlesin M, Maddah M, Kasbi F, Salmani M, et al. Comparison of working memory in normal and dyslexia children in Semnan primary schools. koomesh. 2016;17(2):e153902. doi:

11
Nov
2018
Comparison of Working and Visual Memory in Children with and Without Dyslexia

Comparison of Working and Visual Memory in Children with and Without Dyslexia

Siavash Talepasand,
Mohaddese Eskandaripour,
Ali Taghinezhad

Talepasand S, Eskandaripour M, Taghinezhad A. Comparison of Working and Visual Memory in Children with and Without Dyslexia. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2018;20(9):e70701. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms.70701

28
Sep
2015
Phonological awareness, working memory and reading comprehension in deaf children

Phonological awareness, working memory and reading comprehension in deaf children

Maryam Mokhlesin,
Fatemeh Kasbi,
hourieh ahadi,
Fariba Sojoudi

Mokhlesin M, Kasbi F, ahadi H, Sojoudi F. Phonological awareness, working memory and reading comprehension in deaf children. koomesh. 2015;16(2):e151290. doi:

11
Jan
2017
The Effect of Working Memory Training on English Reading Comprehension of Adult English Learners

The Effect of Working Memory Training on English Reading Comprehension of Adult English Learners

Gholam Reza Kiany,
Bahman Mehraban,
Reza Ghafar Samar

Kiany GR, Mehraban B, Ghafar Samar R. The Effect of Working Memory Training on English Reading Comprehension of Adult English Learners. Educ Res Med Sci. 2017;5(2):e79199. doi:

1
Dec
2023
Examining the effectiveness of improving working memory on reading skill in children with dyslexia

Examining the effectiveness of improving working memory on reading skill in children with dyslexia

Sahar Bahrami,
Peyman Hassani Abharian,
zahra sadat ghoreishi,
Amin Abbasi Soureshjani

Bahrami S, Hassani Abharian P, ghoreishi ZS, Abbasi Soureshjani A. Examining the effectiveness of improving working memory on reading skill in children with dyslexia. koomesh. 2023;25(4):e152851. doi:

More by these authors

Alireza SanganiPubMedScholar
Paria JangiPubMedScholar
Nahid RamakPubMedScholar
Aniseh AhmadiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics