Cover image of the article: Dosimetry of organ at risks in Orthopantomography

Image Credit:Koomesh

Dosimetry of organ at risks in Orthopantomography

Authors

Mehravar Rafati, Amir Eftekhari-Moghadam, Ghazal Mehri-Kakavand, Hadi Hasanzadeh,*, Afsaneh Maftoon
*Corresponding Author: Email: hasanzadeh.h@semums.ac.ir

Koomesh:Vol. 17, issue 1; 262-266
Published online:Dec 28, 2015
Article type:Research Article
Received:Aug 08, 2015
Accepted:Sep 07, 2015
How to Cite:Rafati M, Eftekhari-Moghadam A, Mehri-Kakavand G, Hasanzadeh H, Maftoon A. Dosimetry of organ at risks in Orthopantomography. koomesh. 2015;17(1):e150800. doi:

Abstract

  Introduction: Orthopantomography is a common imaging technique of the jaw. Although in compare to other diagnostic radiology methods, the dose of radiation received by the patient is relatively low in orthopantomography, still is remained as the most common method in diagnostic radiology. Therefore, because of the commonalty of this method, it seemed rational to estimate the dose received by the Organ At Risks (OARs) .   Materials and Methods: This study has been designed to determine the surface dose received by the eyes, parotids, thyroid and submandibular salivary glands using Gafchromic films in 20 patients referred to imaging centers (digital and analog). To increase the repeatability of the technique, each measurement was triplicated and the results were presented as mean (SD) .   Results : The mean measured surface dose received by the submandibular glands (left, right and center), thyroid (left and right), parotid (left and right) and eye (left and right) for the digital system were 4.17, 4.65, 5.08 and 4.74 and for the analog system were 10.33, 10.12, 10.28 and 10.73, respectively .   Conclusion: This study showed no difference in surface dose received by the left and right eyes, left and right thyroid, left and right parotid, left, right and center submandibular glands in any of the digital or analog systems studied (P ≤0.05). In addition, the surface dose received by the selected organs in digital system was significantly lower than that by the analog system (P ≤0.05) .

Highlights

Copyright

© 2015, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

28
Feb
2014

Using Optimal Projections for Reduction of Radiation Risks in Some Radiographies

Ali Chaparian,
Abolfazl Kanani

Chaparian A, Kanani A. Using Optimal Projections for Reduction of Radiation Risks in Some Radiographies. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21288. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21288

23
Mar
2009
Depth dose of critical organs of phantom based on surface dose exposed with Dual X-ray absorptiometry: pencil beam using TLD dosimetry

Depth dose of critical organs of phantom based on surface dose exposed with Dual X-ray absorptiometry: pencil beam using TLD dosimetry

AliAkbar Sharafi,
Manijheh Mokhtari,
Narges Mokhlesian,
Bagher Larijani,
Anoshiravan KazemNezhad

Sharafi A, Mokhtari M, Mokhlesian N, Larijani B, KazemNezhad A. Depth dose of critical organs of phantom based on surface dose exposed with Dual X-ray absorptiometry: pencil beam using TLD dosimetry. koomesh. 2009;10(2):e152226. doi:

18
Sep
2018
Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT

Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT

Zahra Alirezaei,
Keyvan Jabbari,
Tohid Dehghani,
Mohammadbagher Tavakoli,
Mojdeh Mehdizadeh,
Nafiseh Berenjkoob
,et al.

Alirezaei Z, Jabbari K, Dehghani T, Tavakoli M, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Investigating the Effect of mA Variation on Absorbed Dose to Salivary Glands and Mandible Body in CBCT. I J Radiol. 2019;16(1):e13383. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.13383

12
Jun
2018
Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

Safoora Nikzad,
Maryam Pourkaveh,
Naghi Jabbari Vesal,
Farideh Gharekhanloo

Nikzad S, Pourkaveh M, Jabbari Vesal N, Gharekhanloo F. Cumulative Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk Estimation in Common Diagnostic Radiology Procedures. I J Radiol. 2018;15(3):e60955. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.60955

23
Jan
2016
Evaluation of the Patient Effective Dose in Whole Spine Scanography Based on the Automatic Image Pasting Method for Digital Radiography

Evaluation of the Patient Effective Dose in Whole Spine Scanography Based on the Automatic Image Pasting Method for Digital Radiography

Jung-Su Kim,
Sang-Wook Yoon,
Deok-Nam Seo,
So-Ra Nam,
Jung-Min Kim

Kim J, Yoon S, Seo D, Nam S, Kim J. Evaluation of the Patient Effective Dose in Whole Spine Scanography Based on the Automatic Image Pasting Method for Digital Radiography. I J Radiol. 2016;13(1):e22514. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.22514

More by these authors

Mehravar RafatiPubMedScholar
Amir Eftekhari-MoghadamPubMedScholar
Ghazal Mehri-KakavandPubMedScholar
Hadi HasanzadehPubMedScholar
Afsaneh MaftoonPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics