This prospective cohort study followed adults in Shiraz, Iran, for five years to evaluate changes in HRQoL. Overall, HRQoL and its physical and mental dimensions remained relatively stable over time. However, distinct sociodemographic and health-related factors were associated with differential changes in HRQoL. In particular, increasing age and improvements in self-rated health were linked to better MCS, whereas being single was associated with poorer outcomes over time. Changes in supplementary insurance status were also related to changes in HRQoL.
Few population-based studies in Iran have followed adults over time to investigate changes in HRQoL and the factors influencing these changes. This study helps address that gap by providing data from a community-based cohort in the southern part of the country. Most previous studies have been cross-sectional, limiting the ability to infer temporal changes in HRQoL.
In our study, increasing age was associated with improved MCS, whereas a decline in PCS was also observed; however, only the association with MCS reached statistical significance. Previous research has not reached a consistent conclusion regarding how age influences HRQoL, and reported patterns have varied considerably across studies. Some research has suggested that the mental dimension of HRQoL tends to improve with age (23, 24), whereas a population-based study conducted in Bandar Abbas, Iran, found a decrease in this dimension with advancing age (4). Such inconsistencies may be partly attributable to variations in sociodemographic characteristics across study populations, including education level, employment status, and marital status. Notably, age remained an independent predictor of MCS in our multivariable model after adjustment for these covariates.
We observed that, over the five-year period, women showed greater improvements in total HRQoL and PCS than men, while experiencing a decline in MCS; however, these patterns did not meet the predefined threshold for statistical significance. Previous studies have reported associations between gender and HRQoL, with women often found to be at higher risk of lower HRQoL scores (
3-
7,
25). These findings may reflect underlying differences in health status between men and women. Previous evidence has shown a higher burden of chronic illness, disability, and coexisting medical conditions among women (
26), factors that could influence perceived quality of life.
Variation in HRQoL between the two assessments differed according to participants' marital status. Participants who were single at both baseline and follow-up exhibited greater reductions in both total HRQoL and MCS than those who were married at both time points. This observation aligns with evidence suggesting that marriage may confer health-related benefits through mechanisms such as emotional support and stronger social networks. Nevertheless, findings from previous investigations have not been uniform, with some studies reporting more favorable HRQoL among single individuals within particular demographic subgroups.
Findings from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (n = 1,036) indicated more favorable PCS and MCS among single individuals, with the association being stronger in women than in men (
5). However, interpretation of these findings should consider the possibility that widowed individuals were included in the single category. Differences between studies may be attributable to methodological factors. Unlike cross-sectional investigations that evaluate participants at a single assessment point, our longitudinal design enabled the examination of changes in HRQoL over time and may therefore capture patterns that are not detectable in cross-sectional analyses. Furthermore, sociocultural distinctions between Tehran and Shiraz could have contributed to the differing results.
The lower HRQoL observed among single individuals in the present study may be related to lower levels of social support, a factor frequently associated with better psychological well-being. However, because social support was not directly assessed, this explanation remains speculative. Consistent with the inconsistency of existing evidence, another cross-sectional study involving 1,675 Iranian adults found no meaningful relationship between marital status and HRQoL (
6). Evidence from a large Korean population study including 594,202 individuals suggested that the association between marital status and quality of life was not uniform across demographic groups. More favorable quality-of-life ratings were observed among unmarried younger adults, whereas married individuals aged 40 - 69 years generally exhibited better outcomes (
8). Given the variability of findings across populations and research designs, additional longitudinal investigations are warranted to further elucidate the influence of marital status on long-term HRQoL patterns.
Socioeconomic position encompasses multiple dimensions, including education and employment, both of which may influence health and well-being. Findings from previous studies indicate that educational attainment and employment status are often associated with more favorable HRQoL outcomes (
27,
28). In the present study, however, neither educational level nor occupational status was significantly associated with longitudinal changes in HRQoL. These results may indicate that, although education and employment contribute to differences in HRQoL at a given point in time, variation in these factors is not necessarily reflected in changes in HRQoL over a five-year follow-up period.
We also observed that changes in supplementary insurance status were associated with changes in HRQoL. In this study, compared with participants who had supplementary insurance at both baseline and follow-up, those who remained without coverage at both time points showed significant improvements in MCS. In addition, individuals who were uninsured at baseline but obtained supplementary insurance during follow-up demonstrated significant improvements in total HRQoL, PCS, and MCS. These findings may reflect underlying differences across groups. Participants who remained uninsured may represent a subgroup with relatively better baseline health status and a lower perceived need for supplementary coverage, which could partly explain their observed improvement in HRQoL over time. Conversely, the observed improvements among individuals who obtained insurance during follow-up may be related to improved access to healthcare services, increased use of preventive and diagnostic care, and greater financial protection following insurance enrollment. Evidence from previous research has largely indicated beneficial effects of health insurance on HRQoL (
12,
13). Nevertheless, the literature is not entirely consistent. Some investigations have reported less favorable associations, often explained by adverse selection, whereby individuals experiencing poorer health are more inclined to seek or obtain insurance coverage (
14,
29).
Self-rated health status emerged as an important factor related to changes in HRQoL, with better ratings associated with more favorable outcomes in both total HRQoL and MCS. Consistent with our results, evidence from an international study suggested that individuals’ perceptions of their own health are closely linked to quality-of-life measures and also reflect actual health conditions (
30). Taken together, these findings underscore the potential utility of self-rated health as a practical measure for evaluating HRQoL in both research and public health settings (
30).
Although increases in BMI were associated with declines in HRQoL, this relationship did not achieve statistical significance. This finding differs from evidence reported in a systematic review that identified a dose-dependent association between BMI and HRQoL (
31). Several explanations may account for this inconsistency. One possibility is that the degree of BMI variation during the five-year follow-up was too limited to meaningfully affect quality-of-life outcomes. Unmeasured factors may also have contributed. Lifestyle-related behaviors, particularly exercise patterns and nutritional habits, may influence both BMI and HRQoL and may therefore have shaped the association between them.
Previous studies have generally reported lower quality-of-life scores among cigarette smokers (
10,
32); however, a similar pattern was not supported in the present study. One possible explanation is social desirability bias, whereby participants may have underreported their smoking behavior, resulting in an underestimation of its potential impact on HRQoL.
Previous studies have linked alcohol-related problems to lower HRQoL scores (
9); however, such a pattern was not evident in our cohort. One possible explanation relates to the cultural and legal environment in Iran, where concerns about social judgment may discourage participants from accurately disclosing alcohol use. Furthermore, alcohol intake was assessed using a simple dichotomous measure rather than detailed information on the frequency or quantity of consumption. As a result, the analysis may have lacked sufficient sensitivity to identify potential dose-dependent effects of alcohol use on HRQoL.
Available evidence regarding the relationship between substance use, especially opium consumption, and HRQoL remains scarce. In addition, exposure information was obtained through self-report, and variables were grouped into relatively broad categories. These methodological limitations may have introduced exposure misclassification, potentially reducing the likelihood of detecting true associations between substance use and HRQoL (
33).
Across demographic and geographic settings, chronic medical conditions have repeatedly been linked to less favorable HRQoL outcomes (
34). Compared with individuals with normal blood pressure, those with hypertension frequently demonstrate poorer HRQoL (
35,
36). Similar patterns have been reported for diabetes (
37,
38), as well as for reduced kidney function indicated by lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, all of which have been linked to poorer HRQoL outcomes (
39,
40).
In contrast, our analysis did not identify statistically meaningful relationships between chronic diseases and changes in HRQoL over time. Several factors may account for this inconsistency. Interpretation of these findings should consider several methodological constraints. Chronic disease status was assessed using participant-provided information, which may not always accurately reflect true clinical status. Furthermore, relatively few participants had some of the chronic conditions under investigation, reducing the likelihood of detecting small effect sizes. Finally, we did not have data on disease severity or treatment adherence; therefore, it is possible that well-managed or less severe conditions had minimal impact on HRQoL trajectories during the follow-up period.
In our study, changes in metabolic syndrome (MetS) status, assessed using both ATP III and IDF criteria, were not statistically significant. Research examining the impact of MetS on HRQoL has yielded heterogeneous findings. Lower physical and mental HRQoL among older adults with MetS has been reported in some populations (
41). However, an eight-year population-based cohort study observed an association only with worsening mental HRQoL, while changes in the physical component were not apparent (
42). After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, obesity, and other medical conditions, analyses from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey did not identify a significant association between MetS and HRQoL, a finding that aligns with the results of the current study (
43).
5.1. Strengths and Limitations
Longitudinal evidence on factors associated with changes in HRQoL in the Iranian general population remains limited. This study evaluated five-year changes in HRQoL and examined associations between these changes and demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics. The prospective cohort design enabled the assessment of changes in HRQoL over time and the evaluation of potential factors associated with these changes.
Several limitations should be considered. First, the relatively small sample size and number of candidate predictors may have increased the risk of overfitting and unstable regression estimates. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Second, although participants were initially recruited using a multistage cluster sampling approach, only 106 of the 217 participants completed the five-year follow-up assessment. Reasons for loss to follow-up were not systematically recorded, and unmeasured differences between participants retained in the study and those lost to follow-up cannot be excluded. However, comparisons of measured baseline characteristics showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (Table S1 in the Supplementary File), suggesting no evidence of differences in measured baseline characteristics.
Third, information on medical conditions and lifestyle behaviors was based on self-report, and complete verified medical records were not available for all participants. Therefore, recall bias and exposure misclassification may have affected the results. Furthermore, disease severity and treatment adherence were not assessed, which may have limited interpretation of the observed associations between chronic conditions and HRQoL changes.
Residual confounding is also possible because some potentially relevant factors, including baseline HRQoL, healthcare needs, and socioeconomic indicators such as income, were not fully incorporated into the analyses. Therefore, the association between supplementary insurance status and changes in HRQoL should not be interpreted as causal.
The limited sample size may also have reduced statistical power to detect modest associations between clinical or behavioral factors and HRQoL changes. In addition, the distribution of educational attainment was polarized, which may have limited the assessment of potential dose-response relationships. Occupational classification may also have introduced heterogeneity because students were categorized in the unemployed group despite potentially having different socioeconomic and psychosocial characteristics.
Future studies with larger cohorts, more detailed clinical assessments, and objective measurements of lifestyle behaviors and disease status are needed to further clarify factors associated with HRQoL changes in the general population.
5.2. Conclusions
The findings of this five-year population-based cohort study suggest that HRQoL and its domains remained largely unchanged over time. Nevertheless, variation in HRQoL was related to several individual and social characteristics, including age, marital status, supplementary insurance coverage, and self-rated health. Replication of these findings in larger longitudinal cohorts would strengthen the evidence base and help clarify the contribution of social, behavioral, and clinical factors to changes in HRQoL.