Although the antibacterial properties of effective plant compounds, including essential oils and extracts, have been studied in the past, their mechanism of action in reducing or eliminating microbial load requires further investigation. While many chemical compounds in plants are similar, they do not have a specific mechanism for their effect on microorganisms; rather, each compound targets a specific site in the cell. The main factor in the antibacterial effect of plant extracts and essential oils is the chemical compounds that constitute them.
Sabzali investigated the antibacterial properties of the hydroalcoholic extract of
N.oleander on pathogenic bacteria. The results showed that the most effective hydroalcoholic extract of oleander was at a concentration of 76 mg/mL. The largest diameter of the growth inhibition zone at this concentration was related to
Enterococcus faecalis bacteria, and the smallest diameter was related to
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The results indicated that the lowest MIC was for
S. aureus at a concentration of 5 mg/mL, and the highest MIC was for
Escherichia coli and
P. aeruginosa at a concentration of 76 mg/mL (
15).
In the Hamoonnavard study, the antimicrobial effect of
N. oleander on
S. aureus and
Staphylococcus epidermidis showed sensitivity to 40 and 80 μL of 25 mg/mL concentration, all concentrations of 50 mg/mL leaf extract, and all concentrations of 50 mg/mL flower extract (
16). Additionally, the antibacterial properties of three ethanolic and aqueous petroleum extracts of
Nerium oleander on four bacteria (
B. subtilis,
S. aureus,
M. luteus, and
P. aeruginosa) showed that the largest diameter of the growth inhibition zone was observed at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. The ethanolic extract had a greater effect on
S. aureus and
M. luteus with growth inhibition zone diameters of 18 and 14 mm, respectively.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and
Bacillus subtilis were more sensitive to the aqueous extract, with inhibition zone diameters of 15 and 17 mm, respectively, at a concentration of 100 mg/mL (
17).
In a study by Mouhcine, which investigated the antimicrobial activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of
N. oleander, the results showed that the diameter of the inhibitory zone of the aqueous extract against
Enterococcus faecalis was 10.0 ± 1.2 mm and against
L. monocytogenes was 4.0 ± 1.0 mm, while the diameter of the inhibitory zone of the ethanolic extract against
Enterococcus faecalis was 5.3 ± 0.6 mm (
18). Another study showed that a concentration of 200 μg/mL of
N. oleander essential oil inhibited the formation of
P. aeruginosa biofilm (
19).
Rajendra et al. found that the benzene extract had a higher inhibitory diameter (14 mm) than the ethanolic extract of
N. oleander (11 mm) against
B. subtilis (
20). Saeidian et al. reported that the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration of
E. coli showed the highest sensitivity to the alcoholic extract of the leaves, with averages of 62.5 mg/mL and 125 mg/mL, respectively (
21). Valizadeh et al. studied the anti-biofilm effect of ethanolic and acetone extracts of
Karla extract, showing that the lowest inhibitory and lethal concentrations were 1.25 mg/mL and 2.5 mg/mL, respectively (
22). Masithoh et al. found that the diameter of the inhibitory zone of
Karla extract against
Aeromonas hydrophila was 12.3 mm (
23).
In a study of the effect of methanolic extract of
S. nigrum leaves conducted by Zhao et al. on
E. coli,
S. aureus,
B.subtilis, and
Pasteurella multocida, they showed that this extract has a relatively moderate effect on these microbes (
24).
5.1. Conclusions
The results of this study showed that the medicinal plant Karla is a better inhibitor than other plants for eliminating foodborne pathogens.