Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
The Official Journal of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences
Image Credit:Zahedan J Res Med Sci
Outline
The effect of the intrauterine anesthesia using 2% lidocaine for pain reduction during dilatation and curettage operations
Authors
Abstract
Background: Dilatation and curettage (D&C) are common procedures in the assessment of abnormal uterus bleeding. One of the methods in pain reduction during dilatation and curettage is paracervical block, but it does not provide absolute pain reduction. This study was carried out to assess the paracervical block with and without lidocaine consumption to reduce pain during D&C.
Materials and Method: we conducted a double blind clinical trial on 60cases, candidate for (D&C) under paracervical block from April 2008 to March 2009 in Zahedan. The participants were randomly divided into two groups including intrauterine infusion of 5ml lidocain (2%) and 5ml normal saline (0.9%) after paracervical block. These two groups were compared for pain severity using of independent t and chi-squared tests 15, 30 and 60 minutes after operation and complication and patients satisfaction.
Results: Findings of this study indicated that there was not any significant difference between two groups’ demographic characteristics and background variables before and during operation. The average of pain severity in 15, 30, and 60 minutes post operation in saline group was 3.8±3.4, 3.9±3.3, 3.4±2.1 and in lidocaine group was 1.8±2.4, 1.8±2.1, 1.8±2.2, respectively. They revealed statistically significant difference in three stages of time.
Conclusion: The addition of intrauterine lidocaine to paracervical block in patients who are candidates for D&C operations may decrease pain after 15, 30 and 60 minutes post-operation without increasing of complications
Highlights
References
- 1.The References of this article are available on the PDF file.
Copyright
© 2010, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
The Comparison of Pain Relief between Postoperative Wound Infiltration with Bupivacaine 0.5% Combined with Epinephrine after Elective Cesarean Section
modarres nejad V, Motamedi B, Nafisy M. The Comparison of Pain Relief between Postoperative Wound Infiltration with Bupivacaine 0.5% Combined with Epinephrine after Elective Cesarean Section. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2013;15(4):e92997. doi:
Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Pain Reduction after Cesarean Section under General Anesthesia
Hirmanpour A, Talakoub R, Mansouri H. Effect of Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Pain Reduction after Cesarean Section under General Anesthesia. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2018;3(1):e149542. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v3i1.16045
Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic Creams in Reducing Pain During Hysterosalpingography
Kalantari M, Zadeh Modares S, ahmadi F, Hazari V, Haghighi H, et al. Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetic Creams in Reducing Pain During Hysterosalpingography. I J Radiol. 2014;11(4):e93650. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.10513
Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial
Imani F, Lotfi S, Aminisaman J, Shahmohamadi A, Ahmadi A. Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(1):e108335. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108335
Analgesic Effects of Intravenous Ketamine during Spinal Anesthesia in Pregnant Women Undergone Caesarean Section; A Randomized Clinical Trial
Hajiesmaeili MR, Behdad S, Abbasi HR, Ayatollahi V, Khadiv Z, et al. Analgesic Effects of Intravenous Ketamine during Spinal Anesthesia in Pregnant Women Undergone Caesarean Section; A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;3(2):230-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.7034
More by these authors
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 7 hours ago
- OpenAlex: 0
Last Update: 1 day ago
- OpenCitations: 0
Last Update: 4 days ago