1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Materials
3.2. Preparation of Lamellar Matrix
3.3. Thermogravimetric Analysis
3.4. Karl Fischer Titration
3.5. X-ray Diffraction Studies
3.6. Polarized Light Microscopy
3.7. Differential Scanning Calorimetry
3.8. Release Studies
3.9. Skin Permeation Studies
3.10. Diazepam Assay
3.11. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Water Content of Model Matrix and Solvent Evaporation Efficacy
4.2. X-ray Diffraction Studies
4.3. Polarized Light Microscopy
Photographs illustrating the textures of the model matrix and cineole-treated matrices at different cineole contents (% w/w) at ambient temperature. (A) Plain (untreated) matrix, (B) 25%, (C) 40%, (D) 50%, (E) 60%, (F) 70%, (G) liquid part of 80%, (H) and (I) bulky parts of 90% and (J) liquid part of 90%. A positive sample unit is illustrated in Figure B (pointed by an arrow), a myelinic figure in Figure C (pointed by a hollow arrow), and a spherulite in Figure C (pointed by a solid arrow). See text for more details. The scale bar represents 50 µm.
4.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry
Differential scanning calorimetry profile of the plain model matrix showing several endothermic transitions from -30°C to 120°C. The effects of cineole on the main structural transition temperature at 40°C (related to the bilayer arrangements) are shown in the insert box, showing diminishes of this transition by increasing the cineole content of the model matrix. See text for details.
4.5. Release Studies
| Cineole Content (%w/w) | Diffusion Coefficient (cm2h-1) × 106 |
|---|---|
| 40 | 5.11 ± 0.74 |
| 60 | 4.15 ± 1.09 |
| 90 | 4.25 ± 0.21 |
| 100 | 7.61 ± 2.71 |
a Data are presented as mean ± SD.
4.6. Skin Permeation Studies
| Cineole Concentration (%w/w) | Kp (cmh-1) × 104 | Lag-time (h) | Kp Ratio | Lag-time Ratio | Difusivity Ratio* | Partitioning Ratio** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 1.75 ± 0.29 | 4.36 ± 0.60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 60 | 1.68 ± 0.26 | 4.00 ± 0.58 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.09 | 0.88 |
| 90 | 3.31 ± 0.39 | 3.17 ± 0.37 | 1.89 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 1.38 |
| 100 | 7.27 ± 1.33 | 3.13 ± 0.31 | 4.15 | 0.72 | 1.39 | 2.98 |
a Data are presented as mean ± SD. * Reciprocal of lag-time ratio. ** Calculated from Kp ratio and diffusivity ratio.



