Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Computed Tomographic Angiography for Visualizing Medium Sized Inferior and Posterior Projecting Carotid System Aneurysms

1Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries Repair Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, saberih@tums.ac.ir, Iran

2Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries Repair Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

IJ Radiology:Vol. 8, issue 3; 139-144

Published online:Nov 25, 2011

Article type:Research Article

Received:Aug 21, 2010

Accepted:Jul 15, 2011

How to Cite:Hooshang SaberiMohammad HashemiZohreh HabibiAli Tayebi MeybodiSeyed Ali Fakhr TabatabaiHazhir SaberiSofia Sabooriet al.Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Computed Tomographic Angiography for Visualizing Medium Sized Inferior and Posterior Projecting Carotid System Aneurysms.I J Radiol.8(3):139-144.https://doi.org/10.5812/kmp.iranjradiol.17351065.3135.

Abstract

Background: Conventional angiography, generally referred to as intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, still remains the gold standard reference method for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms, helical computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a new non-invasive volumetric imaging method.
Objectives: This study was conducted to screen patients presenting with subarachnoidhemorrhage by CTA before conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and subsequently comparing the results for various aneurysm projections.
Patients and Methods: In a prospective study, 99 consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage were screened for aneurysms with CTA followed by conventional DSA. There were 17 cases with negative angiograms in whom repeat angiograms, three months later were negative for 15 cases, while two cases were found to bear aneurysm on the repeat examination. Eighty two patients had at least one proven aneurysm on initial DSA and two on the repeat angiogram. Out of 84 patients, five underwent endovascular treatment and 79 patients who underwent surgical clipping were considered for projection evaluation.
Results: Sensitivity of CTA was 98.78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.4-99.7%), while the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 81.57-100%) and the kappa coefficient of agreement between CTA and DSA was 96.5%. The most significant discrepancies with DSA findings were for visualizing the projection of inferior and posterior projecting proximal anterior circulation aneurysms.
Conclusions: Helical CTA was in good concordance with DSA for screening of cerebral aneurysms; however, for exact visualization of the aneurysm neck and its projection, especially if it is inferior or posterior, DSA remains the gold standard.

Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education:
This article approaches imaging techniques for screening cerebral aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage which could help radiologists and clinicians to choose the appropriate imaging modalities in practice.

Please cite this paper as:
Saberi H, Hashemi M, Habibi Z, Tayebi Meybodi A, Fakhr Tabatabai SA, Saberi H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Computed Tomographic Angiography for Visualizing Medium Sized Inferior and Posterior Projecting Carotid System Aneurysms. Iran J Radiol. 2011;8(3): 139-44. DOI: 10.5812/kmp.iranjradiol.17351065.3135

Keywords

Angiography

Digital Subtraction

Helical CT

Intracranial Aneurysm

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

comments

Crossmark

Checking

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

Metrics

Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here ( https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.

Search Relations

Author(s):

Hooshang Saberi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Mohammad Hashemi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Zohreh Habibi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Ali Tayebi Meybodi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Seyed Fakhr Tabatabai:[PubMed][Scholar]
Hazhir Saberi:[PubMed][Scholar]
Sofia Saboori:[PubMed][Scholar]