The findings of the present study showed that the changes in hemodynamic parameters, including blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2, were similar in the two groups receiving the E and TM combination; however, 10 minutes after intubation, the TM group had lower mean DBP and MAP. Additionally, there were significant changes in blood pressure and heart rate during the study period in both groups. The trend of changes in SpO2 was significant in the E group and not significant in the TM group. On the other hand, the frequency of hypertension was higher in the etomidate group; nevertheless, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. The findings of the present study showed that the changes in hemodynamic parameters, including blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2, were similar in the two groups receiving the E and TM combination; nonetheless, 10 minutes after intubation, the TM group had lower mean DBP and MAP.
The frequency of adverse responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, including tachycardia, increased blood pressure, and irregular heart rate, was not different between the two groups. In this regard, the results of Masoudifar et al.'s study comparing the effects of the induction of anesthesia to three drugs, etomidate, propofol, and sodium thiopental, on hemodynamic status in laryngoscopy suspension surgery, did not report significant differences between the three groups in terms of hemodynamic changes (
20). Kim et al. investigated the effect of etomidate and sodium thiopental during the induction of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation on hemodynamic parameters in elderly patients. Based on the results, the hemodynamic changes in the two groups were not significantly different (
21).
In the present study, there was no significant difference between the two study groups in terms of cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation, which is similar to the above-mentioned studies (
20,
21). Another study conducted by BAŞ et al. investigated the effect of sodium thiopental, etomidate, propofol, and midazolam on the hemodynamic status in cardiac surgery, in which patients receiving midazolam had higher hemodynamic stability, and midazolam was introduced as a safer drug (
22).
Sonday et al. investigated thiopental versus etomidate for rapid sequence intubation. As a result, they observed no clinical difference between the use of etomidate or thiopental with succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation (
23). In a study by Habibi et al. on patients who were candidates for elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, either etomidate or ketamine-thiopental sodium was used to induce anesthesia. It was observed that after the induction of anesthesia with the administration of ketamine-thiopental sodium, hemodynamic stability was better than that of sodium thiopental (
24).
In another study on patients aged 18 to 45 years who were candidates for elective surgery, they used etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) in the first group, propofol (1.5 mg/kg) and ketamine in the second group, and thiopental (3 mg/kg) and ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) in the third group. The results showed that the propofol-ketamine combination can act as an effective and safe induction agent to reduce hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation, along with hemodynamic stability (
25).
According to the findings of the present study, the duration of laryngoscopy in the group receiving etomidate was significantly less than that of TM. On the other hand, the complications during laryngoscopy were not significantly different between the two groups, which is consistent with the findings of Masoudifar et al.'s study (
20). At the same time, according to the findings of the present study, it seems that the cardiovascular response to the combination of TM is similar to etomidate.
There were certain limitations in the present study, including the small sample size and the study being limited to one center. Furthermore, this study did not utilize invasive blood pressure monitoring, which could have offered a more comprehensive understanding by providing beat-to-beat recordings of the parameters. This decision was made due to financial limitations. Additionally, plasma catecholamine levels were not monitored, which is suggested to be considered in future studies.
4.1. Conclusions
The results of the present study showed that etomidate (E) and a combination of midazolam-sodium thiopental (TM) acted similarly in weakening the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, and it seems that TM can be used instead of E if needed.