Cover image of the article: A Comparative Effect of Intravenous Pethidine vs Sufentanil on Attenuation of Cardiovascular Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial Study

Image Credit:Int Cardiovasc Res J

A Comparative Effect of Intravenous Pethidine vs Sufentanil on Attenuation of Cardiovascular Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial Study

Authors

A Safavi1,*, A Honarmand1
1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: A Safavi, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Email: safavi@med.mui.ac.ir

International Cardiovascular Research Journal:Vol. 1, issue 4; e69720
Published online:Dec 31, 2007
Article type:Research Article
Received:Apr 24, 2018
Accepted:Dec 31, 2007
How to Cite:Safavi A, Honarmand A. A Comparative Effect of Intravenous Pethidine vs Sufentanil on Attenuation of Cardiovascular Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial Study. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2007;1(4):e69720. doi:

Abstract

Background: The study was undertaken to compare the effects of small doses of sufentanil or pethidine on cardiovascular
changes induced by tracheal intubation.
Patients and Methods: Sixty American Soceity of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-II patients, scheduled
for elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, randomly allocated in a double- blind fashion to receive
an intravenous bolus of either sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg (Group S, n = 30) or pethidine 1.5 mg/kg (Group P, n = 30) for
induction of anesthesia. The heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP),
and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured before induction of anaesthesia (baseline), at 1-min intervals
for 3 min after the induction of anesthesia, at 1, 3, 5, and 7 min after start of laryngoscopy.
Results: No significant differences in SAP, DAP, and MAP were observed between the two groups. Heart rate
significantly increased 2 and 3 minutes after induction of anesthesia and 1 minute after intubation in group P
compared with group S (P<0.01). However, the numbers of patients who developed a heart rate increase more
than 20% of basal value were not different between two groups. At the end of the study period, systolic, diastolic,
and mean arterial pressure slightly decreased from preinduction values that was transient and did not require
treatment.
Conclusions: If adequate timing in opioid administration is warranted according to the time to peak effect of
each opioid drug, small doses of sufentanil or pethidine exert similar effect in controlling the inotropic response
induced by the laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

Highlights

Fulltext

The full text is available in PDF.

References

  • 1.
    The references are available in PDF.

Copyright

© 2007, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

14
Mar
2024
Effect of Etomidate Versus Midazolam-Sodium Thiopental on Attenuating the Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

Effect of Etomidate Versus Midazolam-Sodium Thiopental on Attenuating the Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation

Hamidreza Shetabi,
Darioush Moradi Farsani,
Zahra Allafchian

Shetabi H, Moradi Farsani D, Allafchian Z. Effect of Etomidate Versus Midazolam-Sodium Thiopental on Attenuating the Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation. Anesth Pain Med. 2024;14(2):e143382. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-143382

1
Jan
2013
Comparison of Fentanyl and Fentanyl Plus Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

Comparison of Fentanyl and Fentanyl Plus Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia

Valiallah Hassani,
Gholamreza Movassaghi,
Vahid Goodarzi,
Saeid Safari

Hassani V, Movassaghi G, Goodarzi V, Safari S. Comparison of Fentanyl and Fentanyl Plus Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;2(3):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.6442

25
Jan
2014
Comparison Between the Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl and Sufentanil on Hemodynamic Indices During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department

Comparison Between the Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl and Sufentanil on Hemodynamic Indices During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department

Mahboob Pouraghaei,
Payman Moharamzadeh,
Hassan Soleimanpour,
Farzad Rahmani,
Saeid Safari,
Ata Mahmoodpoor
,et al.

Pouraghaei M, Moharamzadeh P, Soleimanpour H, Rahmani F, Safari S, et al. Comparison Between the Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl and Sufentanil on Hemodynamic Indices During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(1):e14618. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.14618

27
Mar
2016
Comparing Clonidine and Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

Comparing Clonidine and Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

Sussan Soltani Mohammadi,
Alireza Maziar,
Alireza Saliminia

Soltani Mohammadi S, Maziar A, Saliminia A. Comparing Clonidine and Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(2):e34271. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.34271

10
Jan
2016
Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial

Afshin Gholipour Baradari,
Abolfazl Firouzian,
Alieh Zamani Kiasari,
Mohsen Aarabi,
Seyed Abdollah Emadi,
Ali Davanlou
,et al.

Gholipour Baradari A, Firouzian A, Zamani Kiasari A, Aarabi M, Emadi SA, et al. Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(1):e30071. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.30071

More by these authors

A HonarmandPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics