Background:
Colonoscopy is performed without preparing sedation in many countries. However, according to the current literature patients are more satisfied when appropriate sedation is prepared for them.
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Colonoscopy is performed without preparing sedation in many countries. However, according to the current literature patients are more satisfied when appropriate sedation is prepared for them.
We hypothesize that propofol-ketamine may prepare more patient satisfaction compared to propofol-fentanyl combination.
Sixty adult patients older than 18 with ASA physical status of I, II or III were enrolled in the present study after providing the informed consent. They were prospectively randomized into two equal groups: 1- Group PF: was scheduled to receive IV bolus dose of fentanyl 1g/kg and propofol 0.5mg/kg. 2- Group PK: was scheduled to receive IV bolus dose of ketamine 0.5mg/kg and propofol 0.5mg/kg. As a primary goal, patients satisfaction was assessed by the use a Likert five-item scoring system in the recovery. Comparisons of hemodynamic parameters (mean heart rate, mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure), mean Spo2 values during the procedure and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and psychological reactions during the recovery period were our secondary goals. Level of sedation during the colonoscopy was assessed with the Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score (OAA/S).
Mean satisfaction scores in the group PK were significantly higher than the group PF (P = 0.005) while the level of sedation during the procedure was similar (P = 0.17). Hemodynamic parameters and SpO2 values were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Incidence of nausea and vomiting was the same in both groups.
IV bolus injection of propofol-ketamine can lead to more patients satisfaction than the other protocols during colonoscopy.
© 2013, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Mohamed Mohamed R, Elsayed Elgahrib Abdalla A, M. Eissa M, Khalil Abdelrahman R, Galal Flefel M, et al. Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy. Anesth Pain Med. 2025;15(1):e156833. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-156833
Moftakhar F, Akhondzadeh R, Hosseininejad F, Alizade Ahvazi S. Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(6):e138929. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-138929
Bahrami Gorji F, Amri P, Shokri J, Alereza H, Bijani A. Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(5):e39835. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.39835
Amri P, Nahrini S, Hajian-Tilaki K, Hamidian M, Alipour SF, et al. Analgesic Effect and Hemodynamic Changes Due to Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl During Elective Colonoscopy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(6):e81077. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.81077
Adinehmehr L, Shetabi H, Moradi Farsani D, Salehi A, Noorbakhsh M. Comparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2019;9(2):e87415. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.87415
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC
Author(s):