Cover image of the article: Conscious Sedation and Analgesia in Colonoscopy: Ketamine/Propofol Combination has Superior Patient Satisfaction Versus Fentanyl/Propofol

Image Credit:Anesth Pain Med

Conscious Sedation and Analgesia in Colonoscopy: Ketamine/Propofol Combination has Superior Patient Satisfaction Versus Fentanyl/Propofol

Authors

Mohammadreza Khajavi1, Azra Emami1, Farhad EtezadiFarhad Etezadi ORCID1,*, Saeid Safari2, Alireza Sharifi3, Reza Shariat Moharari1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Anesthesiology, Rasoul Akram Medical center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
3Department of Gastroenterology, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Sina Hospital, Hassan Abad Sq., Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2122048483, Fax: +98-2166348553, etezadi@tums.ac.ir. Email: etezadi@tums.ac.ir

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine:Vol. 3, issue 1; 208-13
Published online:Jun 30, 2013
Article type:Research Article
Received:Dec 14, 2012
Accepted:Feb 09, 2013
How to Cite:Khajavi M, Emami A, Etezadi F, Safari S, Sharifi A, et al. Conscious Sedation and Analgesia in Colonoscopy: Ketamine/Propofol Combination has Superior Patient Satisfaction Versus Fentanyl/Propofol. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;3(1):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.9653

Abstract

Background:

Colonoscopy is performed without preparing sedation in many countries. However, according to the current literature patients are more satisfied when appropriate sedation is prepared for them.

Objectives:

We hypothesize that propofol-ketamine may prepare more patient satisfaction compared to propofol-fentanyl combination.

Patients and Methods:

Sixty adult patients older than 18 with ASA physical status of I, II or III were enrolled in the present study after providing the informed consent. They were prospectively randomized into two equal groups: 1- Group PF: was scheduled to receive IV bolus dose of fentanyl 1g/kg and propofol 0.5mg/kg. 2- Group PK: was scheduled to receive IV bolus dose of ketamine 0.5mg/kg and propofol 0.5mg/kg. As a primary goal, patients satisfaction was assessed by the use a Likert five-item scoring system in the recovery. Comparisons of hemodynamic parameters (mean heart rate, mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure), mean Spo2 values during the procedure and side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and psychological reactions during the recovery period were our secondary goals. Level of sedation during the colonoscopy was assessed with the Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score (OAA/S).

Results:

Mean satisfaction scores in the group PK were significantly higher than the group PF (P = 0.005) while the level of sedation during the procedure was similar (P = 0.17). Hemodynamic parameters and SpO2 values were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Incidence of nausea and vomiting was the same in both groups.

Conclusions:

IV bolus injection of propofol-ketamine can lead to more patients satisfaction than the other protocols during colonoscopy.

Highlights

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2013, Author(s). The Author(s) retain copyright in the Article. Upon acceptance, the Author(s) grant Brieflands the non-exclusive right of first publication and a worldwide, perpetual, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to copyedit, format, publish, reproduce, distribute, display, preserve, archive, index, promote, and make the Version of Record available in all formats and media. Brieflands and the relevant journal will be identified as the original publisher of the Version of Record. The Article will be published under the [Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The Author(s) may immediately deposit and share the Version of Record in any repository or platform. No separate permission or fee is required for uses permitted under CC BY 4.0. CCC may provide optional customized reprint services.

Similar Articles

25
Feb
2025
Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy

Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy

Rabab Mohamed Mohamed,
Ashraf Elsayed Elgahrib Abdalla,
Mohsen M. Eissa,
Reda Khalil Abdelrahman,
Mohamed Galal Flefel,
Asmaa Abdelbadie
,et al.

Mohamed Mohamed R, Elsayed Elgahrib Abdalla A, M. Eissa M, Khalil Abdelrahman R, Galal Flefel M, et al. Additive Effects of Clonidine Used in Propofol Sedation in Colonoscopy. Anesth Pain Med. 2025;15(1):e156833. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-156833

23
Dec
2023
Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial

Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial

Fatemeh Moftakhar,
Reza Akhondzadeh,
Fatemeh Hosseininejad,
Sarina Alizade Ahvazi

Moftakhar F, Akhondzadeh R, Hosseininejad F, Alizade Ahvazi S. Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(6):e138929. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-138929

22
Aug
2016
Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Fakhroddin Bahrami Gorji,
Parviz Amri,
Javad Shokri,
Hakimeh Alereza,
Ali Bijani

Bahrami Gorji F, Amri P, Shokri J, Alereza H, Bijani A. Sedative and Analgesic Effects of Propofol-Fentanyl Versus Propofol-Ketamine During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(5):e39835. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.39835

21
Nov
2018
Analgesic Effect and Hemodynamic Changes Due to Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl During Elective Colonoscopy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Analgesic Effect and Hemodynamic Changes Due to Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl During Elective Colonoscopy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Parviz Amri,
Sheyda Nahrini,
Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki,
Mohammadtaghi Hamidian,
Seyedeh Fatemeh Alipour,
Seyed Hossein Hamidi
,et al.

Amri P, Nahrini S, Hajian-Tilaki K, Hamidian M, Alipour SF, et al. Analgesic Effect and Hemodynamic Changes Due to Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl During Elective Colonoscopy: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(6):e81077. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.81077

27
Apr
2019
Comparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial

Comparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial

Leili Adinehmehr,
Hamidreza Shetabi,
Darioush Moradi Farsani,
Ali Salehi,
Mohadese Noorbakhsh

Adinehmehr L, Shetabi H, Moradi Farsani D, Salehi A, Noorbakhsh M. Comparison of the Sedation Quality of Etomidate, Propofol, and Midazolam in Combination with Fentanyl During Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2019;9(2):e87415. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.87415

More by these authors

Mohammadreza KhajaviPubMedScholar
Azra EmamiPubMedScholar
Farhad EtezadiPubMedScholar
Saeid SafariPubMedScholar
Alireza SharifiPubMedScholar
Reza Shariat MoharariPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics