Comparison of Fentanyl and Fentanyl Plus Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
Author(s):
Valiallah Hassani2, Gholamreza Movassaghi3, Vahid Goodarzi1,*, Saeid Safari1
2Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Rasoul-Akram Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Iran
3Department of Anesthesiology, Hasheminezhad Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Iran
1Department of Anesthesiology, Rasoul-Akram Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), [email protected], Iran
*Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Rasoul-Akram Medical Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), [email protected], Iran. Tel: +98-2166915196. Fax: +98-2166509059. Email: [email protected]
How to Cite:Hassani V, Movassaghi G, Goodarzi V, Safari S. Comparison of Fentanyl and Fentanyl Plus Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;2(3):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.6442
Abstract
Background:
Induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation often creates a period of hemodynamic instability in hypertensive patients. Endotracheal intubation of the trachea stimulates laryngeal and tracheal sensory receptors, resulting in a marked increase in the elaboration of sympathetic amines.
Objectives:
This trial aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of fentanyl and fentanyl plus lidocaine in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in hypertensive patients.
Patients and Methods:
We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 37 patients with hypertension in the Rasoul-Akram Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from March to December 2011. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (fentanyl group and fentanyl plus lidocaine group). The fentanyl group received 2 mcg/kg and the fentanyl plus lidocaine group received 1.5mg lidocaine and 2mcg/kg fentanyl. Hemodynamic variables were recorded at baseline, after giving inductive anesthetic agents, and 1, 3 and 5 minutes after performing endotracheal intubation.
Results:
We evaluated 37 patients including 15 males (40.54%) and 22 females (59.46%), with a mean age of 56.08 10.85 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding; heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure before induction, 3 minutes before intubation and 1, 3 and 5 minutes after intubation.
Conclusions:
Fentanyl and fentanyl plus lidocaine effectively decreased the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation, however, neither fentanyl nor fentanyl plus lidocaine, could inhibit all hemodynamic responses, moreover fentanyl plus lidocaine was not more effective than fentanyl alone.
Soltani Mohammadi S, Maziar A, Saliminia A. Comparing Clonidine and Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(2):e34271. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.34271
Aminisaman J, Nazari J, Aminisaman Y, Kawyannejad R. Investigating the Effects of Fentanyl and Nitroglycerin on Hemodynamic Changes During Laryngoscopy: A Randomized Trial. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2023;12(2):e142407. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps-142407
Hosseini Jahromi S, HosseiniValami S, Abdollahpour A. Comparing the effect of propofol-alfentanil with ketamine-alfentanil on endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxation. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;15(4):e155659. doi:
Imani F, Alebouyeh M, Taghipour Anvari Z, Faiz SHR. Use of Remifentanil and Alfentanil in Endotracheal Intubation: A Comparative Study. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(2):61-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2130
Pouraghaei M, Moharamzadeh P, Soleimanpour H, Rahmani F, Safari S, et al. Comparison Between the Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl and Sufentanil on Hemodynamic Indices During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(1):e14618. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.14618
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC