Evaluation of Nasogastric Tube Insertion with or without Guide Wire during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Imam Reza AJA Hospital

Authors

Mostafa Shahrezaei1, Mohamadreza Rafiei2, Mohamad Afsahi3, Vahid Ziae4, Saeedreza Ghadirpour5, Ebrahim Hazrati6,*
1Associate Professor of OrthopedicDepartment of AJA University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Tehran, Iran., Iran
2Associate Professor of Anesthesiology Department of AJA University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Tehran, Iran., Iran
3Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Department of AJA University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Tehran, Iran., Iran
4Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology Department of Najaf Abad Azad University of Medical Science., Iran
5General Physician., Iran
6Anesthesia, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Ebrahim Hazrati, Anesthesia, Iran Email: [email protected]

Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research:Vol. 14, issue 1; e13761
Published online:Apr 09, 2016
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 06, 2016
Accepted:Mar 05, 2016
How to Cite:Shahrezaei M, Rafiei M, Afsahi M, Ziae V, Ghadirpour S, et al. Evaluation of Nasogastric Tube Insertion with or without Guide Wire during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Imam Reza AJA Hospital. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2016;14(1):e13761. doi:

Abstract

Purpose: According to frequent needs to gastric decompression by nasogastric tube insertion during laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, the current comparative study was accomplished through single blind clinical trial considering both the presence and the absence of guide wire insertion. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients were selected for elective surgery of laparoscopic Cholecystectomywith general anesthesia.Guide wires were usedin the nasogastric tube insertion operation of patients with even numberswhile the operation of patients with odd numberswas not assisted withthese guide wires.Afterwards, the considered parameters between the two groups were evaluated.The gathered data was analyzed by SPSS softwareversion 18.The results were considered statistically significant for (P = .05). Results: The two groups were uniform regarding demographic parameters such as age, and sex (P = .05).In the group utilized guide wiresthe surgeon’s satisfaction rate was higher while some other parameters such as trial score, bleeding episodes, insertion time, and Rate-Pressure Production Index were meaningfully lower than the those of the group not utilized guide wires. Also, in both groups the success rate of insertion through left nostril was statistically higher (P = .05). Conclusion: In laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, theinsertion method of nasogastric tube with guide wires is better than not using theguide wires.

Fulltext

fulltext is available in pdf.

References

  • 1.
    reference is available in pdf.

Copyright

© 2016, Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

25
May
2011

Comparison of success rate of three methods of nasogastric intubation

mehdi ghaemi,
Hossein Baghari

ghaemi M, Baghari H. Comparison of success rate of three methods of nasogastric intubation. koomesh. 2011;12(4):e152473. doi:

21
Jun
2020

Feasibility of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Conscious Patients: Conventional Method vs. SORT Method

Hamed Afsharjoo,
Ata Mahmoodpoor,
Kavous Shahsavarinia,
Farzad Rahmani

Afsharjoo H, Mahmoodpoor A, Shahsavarinia K, Rahmani F. Feasibility of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Conscious Patients: Conventional Method vs. SORT Method. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(3):e103747. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.103747

5
Jan
2011

Effect of chewing gum on the bowel motility after cholecystectomy

Khadije Yazdi,
Ali Akbar Abdollahi,
Naser Behnampour,
Mani Niazi,
Bijan Arya,
Mahbubeh Azadrah

Yazdi K, Abdollahi AA, Behnampour N, Niazi M, Arya B, et al. Effect of chewing gum on the bowel motility after cholecystectomy. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2011;13(3):e94010. doi:

1
Dec
2024

Efficacy and Complications Comparison Between Emergent and Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery

Hamed Gholizadeh,
Mohsen Andisheh,
Mohammad Raeeszadeh,
Soleyman Heydari,
Jamal Akhavan-Moghaddam,
Mahdi Morshedi
,et al.

Gholizadeh H, Andisheh M, Raeeszadeh M, Heydari S, Akhavan-Moghaddam J, et al. Efficacy and Complications Comparison Between Emergent and Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery. Shiraz E-Med J. 2025;26(1):e144778. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-144778

31
Jan
2010

Infections After Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy: Ceftriaxone Versus Placebo; a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Mohammad Mozafar,
Mohammad Reza Sobhiyeh,
Leili Hafezi Moghadam

Mozafar M, Sobhiyeh MR, Hafezi Moghadam L. Infections After Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy: Ceftriaxone Versus Placebo; a Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2010;5(1):. doi:

More by these authors

Mostafa ShahrezaeiPubMedScholar
Mohamadreza RafieiPubMedScholar
Mohamad AfsahiPubMedScholar
Vahid ZiaePubMedScholar
Saeedreza GhadirpourPubMedScholar
Ebrahim HazratiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics