An important yet neglected aspect of motor development in ASD is fundamental motor skills (FMS). Fundamental motor skills are visible motor patterns of gross motor skills that “involve large muscles of the upper and lower organs and the trunk” (
24) and include “object control, motor skills, and balance skills” (
25). Object control skills include touching and controlling objects with hands or feet, for example, throwing, catching, dribbling, kicking, rolling, and hitting. Moreover, motor skills engage the body to move in different directions; these skills encompass jumping, galloping, bounding, sliding, and leaping. Balance skills aim to control the body during a specific task and involve maintaining balance on one leg, balance with ball motor skills, and maintaining body control during a task (
26). In their research, Pan et al. assessed the FMS in children with ASD and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using three groups, including autism, ADHD, and normal and concluded that in object control and movement patterns, autistic children had more problems than ADHD and normal children (
26).
Some researchers believe that autism can be diagnosed based on children’s motor problems and even distinct from other diagnoses, such as learning disorders or ADHD. Accordingly, Miyahara et al. compared the motor patterns of autistic children with learning disorders and observed that autistic children had lower levels of gross motor skills and ball skills than those with learning disorders (
27). In another study, Green et al. assessed the motor impairments of ASD children and concluded that these children had deficits in motor skills (
13). Manjiviona and Prior showed that 50% of children with Asperger’s syndrome and 67% of children with autism had impairments in Henderson’s Test of Motor Impairments (
28). Ghaziuddin and Butler observed that motor problems were shown to be common using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Motor Skills Test in children with Asperger’s syndrome, autism, or pervasive developmental disorders, which had not been specified in other ways (
29). As inferred from the articles, autistic children show motor problems even when using different motor tests. In these studies, autistic children were also compared to children with other disorders, and autistic children were shown to have more motor problems than those with other disorders, such as ADHD.
In 2016, May et al. investigated a multidisciplinary perspective on the motor impairment of autism spectrum children as a diagnostic criterion. The aforementioned study was a simple review article that, based on the review of various articles, showed that autistic children, compared to normal children in gross movements, motor coordination, walking, upper limb movements, and postural stability are problematic. Movement problems can show themselves before the occurrence of disturbances in social interactions and speech. Delay and movement problems can be of great help as a criterion and behavioral indicator in the diagnosis of autistic children (
14). In a study, Dyck et al. investigated the relationship between symptoms and abilities of autistic children. The samples of this study were 29 children aged 4 to 13 years who had a definitive diagnosis of autism. Autism symptoms, intelligence, language, motor coordination, and social cognition were assessed, and children with autism had low ability in all measures. There were significant differences between intelligence quotient (IQ) and theory of mind, fine and gross motor coordination. The most common difference between IQ scores and motor coordination was observed in 86% of children. There was also a significant relationship between social interactions and motor coordination (
15).
May et al. (2016) examined the relationship between motor development and the severity of stereotyped and repetitive behaviors in autistic children, and 147 parents of children and adults (with an average age of 8 years) answered questions related to motor development and abnormal motor behaviors. Tip-toe walking) and they responded stereotypically. In this study, it was observed that there is a significant relationship between motor damage and repetitive and stereotyped behaviors, and it indicates the ability to predict the occurrence of repetitive behavior through motor development delay (
14). In 2016, Ketcheson, Huck, and Ulrich conducted an article entitled “Effects of Early Movement Interventions on Movement Skills, Social Interactions, and Movement Activity Levels”. In this study, which was conducted on 20 autistic children aged 4 - 6 years, they received movement interventions for 4 hours a day, 5 days a week for 8 weeks. Based on the results of the study, motor interventions improved the control of objects, movements, and gross movements. These authors considered the importance of implementing motor interventions in the treatment of autistic children (
30).
Provost et al. investigated the comparison of motor delay in children with autism spectrum and motor delay of 21 to 41 months. In this study, 56 children (42 male and 14 female) participated, and motor development between these two groups was investigated. Children with autism and motor delay were delayed in motor development; however, there was no difference between these two groups in terms of the amount of this delay (
31).
Hedgecock et al. investigated the relationship between gross motor development delay and the behavior and quality of life of autistic children. In this study, 3253 autistic children aged 2 to 6 years were included in the study. The quality of life of autism spectrum children has a significant relationship; for this reason, these children should be evaluated as soon as possible in terms of gross motor development (
32).
Dowd et al. wrote in 2010 in an article entitled "Can motor skills impairment in autistic children be the main criterion for autism diagnosis". According to the aforementioned article, there is a relationship between motor skills and social communication skills in autistic children (
33). In 2018, Choi et al. conducted a study to investigate the relationship between fine motor skills and expressive speech in children with high and low risk of autism. In this study, 71 normal children, 30 children with a high risk of autism, and 69 children with a low risk of autism were selected. Based on the linear hierarchical model, children with a high risk of autism develop slower in fine skills than normal children between the ages of 6 and 24 months, and fine motor skills at 6 months can predict expressive speech at 3 years old (
18). In 2008, Ozonoff et al. investigated motor development, motor abnormalities, and warning signs of autism spectrum. In the aforementioned study, autistic, normal, and motor delay children in terms of motor development (grasping, rolling, sitting, crawling, and walking) were evaluated using home videos. Noticeable differences were observed in palmar, archer, and walking patterns, and movement abnormalities and delays in protective skills were not observed (
34).
In a review article, Downey and Rapport examined the movement activity of autistic children. Physiotherapists should use movement activity as a main measure of autistic children. In this article, 49 studies were included, and it was observed that the amount of research carried out in this field is very limited and incomplete. Autistic children have problems in the field of movement, and appropriate interventions should be implemented in this field (
35). In 2019, Bricout et al. investigated motor capacities in autistic boys. The purpose of the aforementioned study was to determine the specific motor profile of autistic male children and to determine the most appropriate motor test. In the aforementioned study, 22 autistic children with an average age of 10 years and 20 healthy children with an average age of 10 years were selected. Additionally, 42 movement tests were taken from them. These children had problems with flexibility, strength, endurance, manipulation, and ball skills (
23).
In 2012, Lane et al. wrote an article entitled the motor characteristics of autistic children. In the aforementioned study, 30 children with an average age of 32 months were tested using the Bailey test, version 3, and 8 months are delayed compared to normal children from the point of view of fine motor development. Therefore, gross and fine motor development can be used as an early diagnosis criterion (
20). Gabis et al. showed that motor delay is a common danger alarm in female children compared to boys. In the aforementioned study, 467 children with an average age of 3.5 years were included in the study. According to the study, 60% and 47% of female and male children have motor delays, respectively. In addition, 49% and 36% of female and male children show general delay, respectively. Female children’s walking delay can be used as a diagnostic criterion (
36).
In 2013, Bugnariu et al. investigated motor performance in children with autism. In this study, 7 autistic children and 7 normal children aged 2 to 12 years were evaluated in terms of walking, standing balance, reaching, pointing, and dynamic tasks. Autistic children have problems in walking, reaching, and balancing compared to normal individuals. According to the authors, although movement problems are not a diagnostic criterion, they can be a useful help in this field (
21).
Jansiewicz et al. investigated the distinguishable motor signs between autistic, Asperger's, and normal children. In the aforementioned study, 40 autistic male children and 55 normal children aged 6 to 17 years were included. According to the results of the study of these children in terms of movement problems, autistic children were distinguishable from normal children (
37). In a study involving 162 autistic children aged 12 to 36 months, Liyod, MacDonald, and Lord examined movement issues, and it was shown that autistic children are delayed in gross and fine movements, compared to normal children (
22).
In 2007, Ming et al. conducted a study on the prevalence of movement problems in twins of the autism spectrum. In the aforementioned study, 154 children were evaluated using the cohort method in terms of movement disorders, such as hypotonia, walking on the toes, movement apraxia, and reduced flexibility. Ankle and gross motor delays were evaluated. Hypotonia was the most common motor symptom (
38), which improved with time, followed by motor apraxia (
23), toe walking (
29), and gross motor delay (
9). It was observed in these children, according to the authors, that movement injuries are common in these children and require timely therapeutic interventions (
38).
Bhat et al. investigated motor delay with communication problems in twin infants at risk of autism spectrum. In this study, 24 high-risk twins and 24 low-risk twins with autism at the ages of 3 and 6 months and then 36 months were studied based on the cohort method. Most of the twins with a high risk of autism had a motor delay, compared to children with low risk, and had more communication problems (67 - 73%) (
39).
Holloway et al. investigated the relationship between gross movements and social skills of autistic male children. In the aforementioned study, 21 autistic children were evaluated based on Peabody Test 2, Miller's participation scale, and social skills improvement scale. The highest correlation was observed between general gross movement skills and social skills. Moreover, stability was central to these skills. Specifically, stability, movement accuracy, and manipulation of objects can predict social skills (
40).
Paying attention to early symptoms and interventions in autistic children has received much attention from researchers in recent years. Due to the rapid growth of the brain at lower ages and attention to the golden growth time for performing proper treatment, most researchers seek early diagnosis. The motor domain of autistic children has been overlooked in the past years; however, the stages of motor development and motor delay have recently received much attention from researchers. According to studies performed by Bedford et al. (
16), Ohara, et al. (
17), Dowd, et al. (
33), motor symptoms are associated with behavioral symptoms of autistic children. This motor developmental delay does not improve with time. This association might be sought in brain circuits where, based on research, the cerebellum and basal nuclei are injured and related to motor delay. Some studies even regard frontostriatal circuit (conscious planning of movement) and cerebellum (unconscious planning of movement) injuries as significant issues (
31). Even in some cases, these children benefit from the frontostriatal area to compensate for the impaired cerebellum; this circuit also requires increased attention and motor control, making it difficult for the child.
Finding more specific relationships between motor and social skills might help in designing effective motor skill interventions for improved social functioning among individuals with ASD. Among studies of gross motor skills, object control/aiming and catching skills, which include ball throwing, catching, and kicking, were observed to be most likely to be related to social skills, based on repeated findings of these links in previous research. Previous studies have reported that lower-level object control/aiming and catching skills are prominent characteristics of individuals with ASD (
17).
Unfortunately, many ASD children do not receive an early diagnosis, and the diagnosis is delayed until 3 years of age. This delay hinders performing specialized and accurate treatments on these children; however, by benefitting from motor problems and topics, early diagnosis can be achieved. The research literature on autistic children has shown that motor problems are significantly associated with socio-communicative symptoms and school-related problems; accordingly, Van Waelvelde et al.’s study showed that the existence of motor problems and injuries led to autistic children’s reduced quality of life (
41). The existence of these problems has caused motor issues to be controversial as even the central nucleus of the problems of autistic children. Rinehart N and McGinley J even recognized the motor problems of autism as the central nucleus of this disorder, which occupational therapists and physiotherapists should maneuver more in this section (
42).
Articles have not yet investigated the behavioral symptoms and motor problems. According to the present information, it can be concluded that motor impairment is possibly associated with the behavioral symptoms of ASD. Further research is required to determine the exact relationship between motor subsets and behavioral symptoms. Among the limitations of this study were the age of the studied samples and the lack of specialized articles on communication and movement problems that require further investigation and research. Considering the limited research conducted in the field of behavioral and motor symptoms, it is suggested that research be conducted in some fields, including communication and sensory problems.