This systematic review highlights the wide spectrum of atypical clinical features observed in patients with expanded dengue syndrome, emphasizing the importance of recognizing non-classical manifestations beyond the traditional febrile presentation of dengue virus infection. Diagnosing expanded dengue syndrome remains challenging because it can mimic numerous infectious, hematologic, rheumatologic, and gastrointestinal conditions. Coinfections and cross-reactivity in serological tests further complicate diagnostic accuracy, often delaying management. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and rely on a combination of careful clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, and molecular testing to differentiate expanded dengue syndrome from mimicking conditions and to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions (
17).
In our findings, gastrointestinal symptoms were among the most frequently reported atypical presentations in patients with dengue. Pancreatitis, vomiting, and diarrhea were predominant, supporting earlier studies showing that gastrointestinal involvement is a notable feature of severe dengue infections (
18,
19). The most frequent laboratory findings associated with gastrointestinal complications included elevated liver enzymes, such as AST and ALT, and changes in platelet levels, which were observed in 46.2% of cases with gastrointestinal manifestations. Although these manifestations were not often fatal, they correlated with significant laboratory abnormalities, emphasizing the need for early laboratory evaluation and monitoring. Notably, diabetes emerged as the most common underlying condition in these patients, suggesting a possible link between metabolic dysfunction and increased vulnerability to gastrointestinal involvement.
Similarly, a cross-sectional study by Dinkar et al. (
20) in India reported that among 220 dengue patients, severe hepatic dysfunction was significantly more frequent in secondary dengue (45.4%) than in primary dengue (11.1%). Pancytopenia was observed in 19.1% of cases, with a higher proportion in secondary dengue (36.6%). These findings are largely consistent with our results, indicating that gastrointestinal involvement, hematologic abnormalities, and multisystem derangements are more pronounced in secondary or severe dengue cases. This study also underscores the importance of monitoring liver enzymes, platelet counts, and blood cell indices to anticipate complications and guide clinical management (
20).
Furthermore, rare but critical complications such as dengue-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) have been reported. For example, an 18-year-old female developed severe pancytopenia and progressive liver dysfunction secondary to dengue, ultimately meeting diagnostic criteria for HLH. She responded favorably to pulse methylprednisolone therapy, highlighting the importance of early recognition and prompt immunomodulatory intervention in such cases (
21).
Cardiovascular manifestations, although less frequent than gastrointestinal findings, were associated with the highest mortality in our study. Myocarditis, arrhythmias, and pericardial diseases such as effusions were common in this group. Myocarditis has emerged as a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality in dengue patients; however, sufficient data on the incidence and comprehensive characterization of myocarditis in dengue infection are lacking. Our findings showed a mortality rate of 15.4% among patients with cardiovascular involvement, underscoring the need for close cardiac surveillance in dengue cases, particularly in those with severe manifestations. According to a study conducted by Baqi et al., the in-hospital mortality rate among patients with dengue-related myocarditis was 21.4% (
22). Patients with this complication were nearly five times more likely to experience prolonged hospital stays. The study further reported that all patients with dengue myocarditis had elevated cardiac troponin I (cTn-I), 59.5% had at least one abnormal ECG finding, and 24% had reduced ejection fraction (EF < 55%). Additionally, there was a noticeable trend toward increased rates of shock and liver enzyme abnormalities among myocarditis patients (
23).
Ocular manifestations in dengue were generally non-lethal but have the potential for long-term morbidity due to visual impairment. Although uncommon, ocular complications in dengue can affect both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye and are often linked to thrombocytopenia (
24). Hemorrhage is the most frequently observed finding; however, conditions such as anterior uveitis and vasculitis may reflect underlying immune-driven mechanisms (
25). Our findings indicate that, although no fatalities were reported among patients with ocular involvement, dengue infection can manifest with a diverse range of retinal, uveal, conjunctival, eyelid, and optic neuropathic complications. This broad spectrum of ocular findings may facilitate early recognition and clinical management of dengue-associated visual disturbances. Maculopathy was the most common retinal disease, highlighting its potential as a key indicator of dengue-associated ocular involvement. Dengue-related maculopathy encompasses a broad clinical presentation, most often occurring about a week after fever onset. Common features include intraretinal hemorrhages, macular swelling, optic disc edema, and foveolitis (
26,
27).
Similarly, Dinkar et al. (
28) reported a case of dengue-associated reversible blindness characterized by bilateral retinal hemorrhage and severe thrombocytopenia. This observation aligns with our findings, reinforcing that retinal involvement and hemorrhagic changes likely reflect immune-mediated and vascular injury mechanisms (
28).
Respiratory manifestations of dengue infection were associated with a mortality rate of approximately 9% among patients with documented outcomes, underscoring the need for prompt respiratory evaluation and preparedness for intensive care, particularly in patients with signs of respiratory compromise. Radiologic findings, including ground-glass opacities, were frequently observed and may suggest secondary immune-mediated lung injury or viral pneumonitis (
29). Co-infections, such as malaria, further complicate clinical management in endemic regions because of overlapping symptoms such as fever and hemolysis, which may obscure timely diagnosis and treatment. Although ARDS is relatively uncommon in dengue overall, it is more frequently reported in severe or fatal cases (
30). However, given the limited data in the reviewed studies, the precise impact of co-infections on disease severity and patient outcomes remains unclear and warrants further investigation.
This aligns with a recent case report of a 27-year-old female with severe dengue who developed bilateral lung infiltrates, required prolonged ventilatory support, and had complications including severe hepatitis and pontine infarct (
31).
Similarly, a 30-year-old female presented with ARDS, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, and subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage and was managed successfully with supportive care and ventilatory assistance (
32). These cases highlight the importance of early recognition of respiratory compromise and readiness for intensive care interventions. Pleural effusion, noted in nearly half of the cases, further emphasizes the need for careful monitoring and timely interventions such as ventilatory support and intravenous fluids.
In summary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, ocular, and respiratory symptoms are critical to the clinical diagnosis and management of dengue, particularly when multiple organ systems are affected simultaneously. These manifestations often correlate with more severe disease outcomes, especially in patients with underlying comorbidities, and emphasize the need for multidisciplinary management.
4.1. Study Limitations
Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the included studies were predominantly case reports and small case series, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, systematic reporting of dengue virus serotypes, patient comorbidities, and long-term outcomes was largely absent. Third, most studies lacked standardized diagnostic criteria for atypical presentations, making cross-study comparisons difficult. Fourth, certain atypical manifestations, such as neurological symptoms, were not reported in the included studies, representing another limitation. Fifth, geographical bias is an important concern, as most reports originated from South and Southeast Asia, with limited representation from other endemic regions such as Africa and Oceania. Sixth, because the evidence was mainly case-based, methodological quality and data completeness varied considerably across studies.
Seventh, because of the exclusively descriptive nature of data derived from case reports and case series, together with the lack of access to individual-level data and control variables, advanced statistical analyses and causal inference were not feasible. This limitation has been duly acknowledged and highlighted in the study.
Eighth, an additional limitation is that this review was restricted to English-language publications. This approach was used to ensure accuracy in data extraction and minimize potential translation-related errors; however, it may have led to the exclusion of relevant evidence published in other languages.
4.2. Future Research
Future research should focus on developing standardized diagnostic criteria for expanded dengue syndrome to ensure consistency across clinical and epidemiological investigations. Larger multicenter cohort studies and prospective surveillance systems are needed to better define the true burden, spectrum, and pathophysiology of atypical manifestations. It is also essential to explore whether specific dengue virus serotypes are more strongly associated with particular complications, such as myocarditis or pancreatitis. Given the absence of effective antiviral therapies, the development of targeted treatment protocols for patients with severe organ involvement should be prioritized, along with investigations into host-related factors such as genetic susceptibility and pre-existing comorbidities.
Notably, no included study reported patients with simultaneous involvement of multiple organ systems (e.g., concurrent cardiac and gastrointestinal or respiratory manifestations), which likely reflects a lack of integrated clinical reporting rather than a true absence of multisystem disease.
Overall, this review underscores the pressing need for heightened clinical awareness of atypical dengue presentations, which often mimic other systemic illnesses and may lead to delayed or inappropriate treatment. The data suggest that organ-specific complications such as maculopathy and myocarditis may serve as early indicators of disease severity, meriting focused diagnostic and monitoring strategies. Moreover, the potential pathophysiological role of comorbidities, particularly diabetes and cardiovascular disease, in modulating the host immune response and disease course warrants further investigation. Future research should not only aim to clarify these mechanisms but also identify early biomarkers and develop risk stratification tools to guide management in resource-limited settings. Importantly, the absence of integrated reporting on multi-organ involvement highlights the need for comprehensive clinical documentation in future studies.
4.3. Conclusions
This systematic review highlights the distinctive clinical picture of expanded dengue syndrome, involving the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, ocular, and respiratory systems. The most frequent complications were pancreatitis, myocarditis, maculopathy, and pleural effusion, with cardiovascular involvement associated with the highest mortality. Most reported cases originated from Asia, particularly the Indian subcontinent, Sri Lanka, and Pakistan, whereas cases from Europe, Africa, and Oceania were reported only occasionally.
These findings highlight the need for heightened clinical suspicion of atypical dengue presentations and call for standardization of case definitions and improved surveillance in endemic and non-endemic regions. Statements regarding organ-specific tropism or pathophysiology should be regarded as biologically plausible hypotheses rather than proven mechanisms.
Overall, this review emphasizes that the descriptive nature of case reports and case series limits the ability to draw causal inferences or estimate incidence. Future research should aim to confirm these observations in larger cohort studies and explore potential mechanistic pathways under controlled study designs.