Several studies applied ANNs to predict the concentration or emission of one or more air pollutants in an area (
9,
27,
28,
30-
34). They applied various methodologies to forecast future air pollution conditions, as well as climate change impacts on air quality. They focused on this issue and investigated it as an open problem. Recently, studies are conducted to project future air pollution-related mortality or morbidity under a changing climate, although each of them has limitations (
8). GCMs or regional climate models are used to project future air pollutant levels and their health consequences (
35). GCMs or regional climate models (RCMs) are used to project future air pollutant levels and their health impacts by researchers. They closely examined the uncertainties in this project and investigated projection on a regional scale, in addition to using multiple models to reduce these uncertainties (
8). In the current study, 10 GCM experimental outputs were applied and compared with the 30-year recorded meteorological values. Dynamical or statistical high-resolution downscaling technique was used to estimate health consequences caused due to air pollutants (
13). In the current study, statistical downscaling was performed using LARS WGs to analyze and project future climate pattern under two RCP (2.6 and 8.5) scenarios. Furthermore, in the current study, LARS-WG was calibrated for these new scenarios to generate future climate patterns.
Data-driven models such as ANNs were used to simulate air pollutant concentrations and their health outcomes (
28,
31,
33,
36,
37). Thomas and Jacko developed a multivariate regression and ANN model to forecast PM
2.5 and CO around an expressway (Borman). They applied the wind speed, wind direction (transformed in to wind direction Index), pressure, temperature, and the speed of the vehicles as inputs and CO and PM
2.5 as targets. By stepwise regression, they found that the wind speed, wind direction, and temperature did not improve the model performance. MLP ANNS was used by the MATLAB software. The current study investigated both the regression and ANNS successfully used to forecast air pollution episodes. They can be improved by including more input variables. However, ANNS had a better performance than regression due to the ability to model nonlinearity (
38). In another study, three standard MLP, time- lagged feed- forward, recurrent ANNs and Bayesian ANNs were developed by Solaman et al. for ground-level ozone concentration forecasting in Hamilton, Canada. SR, T
Max, WS, W direction, RH, dry-bulb temperature, and vapor pressure were meteorological variables for the ozone forecasting. They showed that all of these models could effectively forecast the ozone concentration (
31). Diaz-Robles et al. compared the applicability of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), multi-linear regression (MLR), and ANNS separately and in combination with air quality forecasting in emergency situations and found that a combination of the ARIMA-ANNS model was more accurate to forecast pre emergency air pollution episodes (
39). Moustris et al. used the MLP feed forward ANNS to forecast the maximum daily value of NO
2, CO, SO
2, and O
3 in Athens, Greece. They compared seven structures of ANNS and found that it was necessary to increase the input to obtain reliable forecasts (
28). Noori et al. tested principal component analysis (PCA) and GT to assess the effect of input variables on support vector machine (SVM) to predict stream flow. They reported that preprocessing the inputs with both PCA and GT methods improved the SVM performance (
40). Inal developed MLP type ANNS with nine meteorological items and nine air pollutants to predict ozone in Istanbul, Turkey and compared its performance with nonlinear regression, but found no significant difference between the two methods (
27). In this field, GA is applied to optimize the ANN topology (
29,
41). The researchers applied GA only to optimize NN architecture, but in the current study, gamma statistic and GA were used to preprocess and optimize the data-driven model and determine the best combination of predictors. This could prevent the over-fitting of NN. In the first stage of the current study, an algorithm was developed to improve the capability of this technique to simulate the health effect of air pollution, published earlier (
22). Moreover, optimizing the file parameters, process elements in input/hidden/output layer, transferring or learning functions using GA were performed in the second stage of the current study. The MLP type of NN was used to develop the data-driven model to forecast the short-time effects of weather variables on air pollution or predict the emergency department visit for respiratory symptoms. The researchers setup their NN with one to eight hidden layer(s) and loaded a maximum of eight weather and air pollutant variables; furthermore, these variables should optimize the MSE to about 0.04 (
28,
33,
37,
41). In the current study, more predictors were considered to simulate future trend of two desired outputs and develop a simpler model with one hidden layer, realizing MSE of about 0.035 in training and 0.02 in cross-validation. However, the eliminated inputs had a low effect.
Bibi et al. demonstrated that emergency department visits were sensitive to temperature, humidity, barometric pressure, SO
2, and NO
2 (
37). Moreover, dependence of air quality on meteorological variables was assessed by −, =, +, and ++ signs (
2). In the current study, sensitivity values of current day and three-day moving average values of each of the inputs on the prediction of EMS clients with cardiovascular or respiratory problems were determined (
Figure 3). Annual or monthly trends of EMS clients with cardiovascular and respiratory problems depended on changes and interactions of air pollutant levels and meteorological conditions (
Figures 3 and
4).