Our study revealed that ABSI, BRI, WHR, and WHtR were associated with NAFLD. The association between these indices and NAFLD remained even after removing the effects of other potential mediators such as age, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance. However, BRI and WHtR showed higher associations with NAFLD than ABSI and WHR. Although BRI is a new index, several studies evaluated its ability to predict or discriminate the outcomes of heart diseases, hyperuricemia, and diabetes. For example, Chang et al. reported that BRI is a superior measure than BMI, WC, and WHtR to determine the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), particularly for eccentric LVH (
13). Zhang et al. reported a slightly different ability of BRI, WHtR, and WC in the diagnosis of hyperuricemia in a cross-sectional study of a Chinese rural population (
16). In an evaluation of the association between BRI and ABSI and diabetes mellitus, Chang et al. determined that neither ABSI nor BRI were superior to BMI, WC, or WHtR in the discrimination of diabetic patients (
12). They reported the weakest discriminatory ability for ABSI among the above mentioned indices (
12). Although Maessen et al. reported that BRI was able to determine the presence of CVD, they did not detect a significant difference among BRI, WC, and BMI in this context. However, WHtR was not evaluated in their study (
14).
Our results also revealed an equal discriminatory ability for BRI and WHtR in the diagnosis of NAFLD. With a simple and straightforward manipulation of the WHtR formula, we can conclude that BRI is a univariable function of WHtR using the following formula:
As a result, we should not expect a significant difference between the discriminatory ability of BRI and that of WHtR. In fact, when we are looking to predict or discriminate a condition such as NAFLD, an equal discriminatory ability will be obtained from WHtR and BRI. On the other hand, the optimal cut-off points of BRI and WHtR can be easily converted to each other using the above equation (the formula of BRI based on WHtR). In other words, the results of each of these two indices can be expressed in terms of the other (more details are discussed in Appendix 1 of the Supplementary File).
Our calculated cut-off points for BRI (4.00 for men and 5.00 for women) and WHtR (0.533 in men and 0.58 in women) were greater for women than for men. The greater cut-off points of these indices for women compared to men is not unexpected due to the almost equal WC between our male and female participants, and a dramatically lower height in our female participants as compared to the heights of men (regarding the BRI and WHtR formula).
As mentioned above, our results revealed that BRI and WHtR had high (and equal) discriminatory abilities in the diagnosis of NAFLD. Although Zheng et al. reported an even higher discriminatory ability of WHtR than that of our study, they emphasized that the ability of WHtR was less than WHR, which is in disagreement with our results (
17). However, the discriminatory ability of BRI was not evaluated in their study. These inconsistent findings among the studies can be partly attributed to the difference in anthropometric characteristics among various ethnic and racial groups.
In summary, we evaluated the discriminatory ability of two new indices of obesity in the diagnosis of NAFLD besides WHR and WHtR in a large community based study. We also obtained the optimal cut-off points for BRI and WHtR in the diagnosis of NAFLD in men and women, separately. We were able to show that the discriminatory ability of these two indices is identical, and that the optimal cut-off points of these two indices are interchangeable, using a simple algebraic equation (a function of BRI in terms of the variable of WHtR or vice versa).
Our study had some limitations. It had a cross-sectional design, which is not optimal for establishing a cause and effect relationship. It is worth mentioning, though, that since we evaluated the association between obesity and related indices with NAFLD, determining a cause and effect relationship is not necessarily logically problematic. We also did not utilize liver biopsy in the diagnosis NAFLD. Applying biopsy (as an invasive diagnostic tool) in a large community based study is not only an unethical approach, but also may lead to a relatively high false-negative rate in the detection of NAFLD (
18).
5.1. Conclusion
While BRI and WHtR have an equally strong association with NAFLD, ABSI and WHR have a weaker association with NAFLD than BRI and WHtR. The optimal cut-off points of BRI were 4.00 and 5.00 for men and women, and the optimal cut-off points of WHtR were 0.533 and 0.580 for men and women, respectively.