Cover image of the article: Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography

Image Credit:Int J Cancer Manag

Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography

Authors

Hajar Moradmand1,*, Saeed Setayeshi1, Ali Reza Karimian2, Mehri Sirous3, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari4
1Dept. of Biomedical Radiation Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Hajar Moradmand, Dept. of Biomedical Radiation Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, Tel: +98-3112645946, E-mail: Email: sky@aut.ac.ir

International Journal of Cancer Management:Vol. 5, issue 2; e80801
Published online:Jun 30, 2012
Article type:Research Article
Received:Nov 12, 2011
Accepted:Feb 07, 2012
How to Cite:Moradmand H, Setayeshi S, Karimian AR, Sirous M, Akbari ME. Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography. Int J Cancer Manag. 2012;5(2):e80801. doi:

Abstract

Background: Mammography is the primary imaging technique for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the contrast of a mammogram image is often poor, especially for dense and glandular tissues. In these cases the radiologist may miss some diagnostically important microcalcifications. In order to improve diagnosis of cancer correctly, image enhancement technology is often used to enhance the image and help radiologists.

Methods: This paper presents a comparative study in digital mammography image enhancement based on four different algorithms: wavelet-based enhancement (Asymmetric Daubechies of order 8), Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), morphological operators and unsharp masking. These algorithms have been tested on 114 clinical digital mammography images. The comparison for all the proposed image enhancement techniques was carried out to find out the best technique in enhancement of the mammogram images to detect microcalcifications.

Results: For evaluation of performance of image enhancement algorithms, the Contrast Improvement Index (CII) and profile intensity surface area distribution curve quality assessment have been used after any enhancement. The results of this study have shown that the average of CII is about 2.61 for wavelet and for CLAHE, unsharp masking and morphology operation are about 2.047, 1.63 and 1.315 respectively.

Conclusion: Experimental results strongly suggest that the wavelet transformation can be more effective and improve significantly overall detection of the Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system especially for dense breast. Compare to other studies, our method achieved a higher CII.

Highlights

Fulltext

Full text is available in PDF.
 

Copyright

© 2012, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
Mar
2010
Effects of Enhancement Methods on Diagnostic Quality of Digital Mammogram Images

Effects of Enhancement Methods on Diagnostic Quality of Digital Mammogram Images

Mostafa Langarizadeh,
R Mahmud,
AR Ramli,
S Napis,
MR Beikzadeh,
WEZ Wan Abdul Rahman

Langarizadeh M, Mahmud R, Ramli A, Napis S, Beikzadeh M, et al. Effects of Enhancement Methods on Diagnostic Quality of Digital Mammogram Images. Int J Cancer Manag. 2010;3(1):e80655. doi:

19
Sep
2021
An Efficient Method for Automated Breast Mass Segmentation and Classification in Digital Mammograms

An Efficient Method for Automated Breast Mass Segmentation and Classification in Digital Mammograms

Behrouz Niroomand Fam,
Alireza Nikravanshalmani,
Madjid Khalilian

Niroomand Fam B, Nikravanshalmani A, Khalilian M. An Efficient Method for Automated Breast Mass Segmentation and Classification in Digital Mammograms. I J Radiol. 2021;18(3):e106717. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.106717

15
Aug
2001
Discriminate of microcalcification in breast tissue with digital mammography: the presentation a new method of processing

Discriminate of microcalcification in breast tissue with digital mammography: the presentation a new method of processing

Manizheh MokhtariDizaji

MokhtariDizaji M. Discriminate of microcalcification in breast tissue with digital mammography: the presentation a new method of processing. koomesh. 2001;2(3):e151935. doi:

22
Jul
2015
Ensemble Supervised Classification Method Using the Regions of Interest and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrices Features for Mammograms Data

Ensemble Supervised Classification Method Using the Regions of Interest and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrices Features for Mammograms Data

Hossein Yousefibanaem,
Alireza Mehri Dehnavi,
Makhtum Shahnazi

Yousefibanaem H, Mehri Dehnavi A, Shahnazi M. Ensemble Supervised Classification Method Using the Regions of Interest and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrices Features for Mammograms Data. I J Radiol. 2015;12(3):e91069. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.11656

30
Apr
2024
Automatic Classification of Cancerous Masses in Digital Mammograms Using Curvelet Analysis and Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network Model

Automatic Classification of Cancerous Masses in Digital Mammograms Using Curvelet Analysis and Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network Model

Fereshteh Torabi Jafroudi,
Azadeh Kiani-Sarkaleh,
Mahyar Nirouei

Torabi Jafroudi F, Kiani-Sarkaleh A, Nirouei M. Automatic Classification of Cancerous Masses in Digital Mammograms Using Curvelet Analysis and Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network Model. I J Radiol. 2024;21(2):e146102. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-146102

More by these authors

Hajar MoradmandPubMedScholar
Saeed SetayeshiPubMedScholar
Ali Reza KarimianPubMedScholar
Mehri SirousPubMedScholar
Mohammad Esmaeil AkbariPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics