Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography

Author(s):
Hajar  MoradmandHajar Moradmand1,*, Saeed SetayeshiSaeed Setayeshi1, Ali Reza KarimianAli Reza Karimian2,  Mehri Sirous Mehri Sirous3, Mohammad Esmaeil AkbariMohammad Esmaeil Akbari4
1Dept. of Biomedical Radiation Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Hajar Moradmand, Dept. of Biomedical Radiation Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, Tel: +98-3112645946, E-mail: Email: [email protected]

International Journal of Cancer Management:Vol. 5, issue 2; e80801
Published online:Jun 30, 2012
Article type:Research Article
Received:Nov 12, 2011
Accepted:Feb 07, 2012
How to Cite:Moradmand H, Setayeshi S, Karimian AR, Sirous M, Akbari ME. Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography. Int J Cancer Manag. 2012;5(2):e80801. doi:

Abstract

Background: Mammography is the primary imaging technique for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer; however, the contrast of a mammogram image is often poor, especially for dense and glandular tissues. In these cases the radiologist may miss some diagnostically important microcalcifications. In order to improve diagnosis of cancer correctly, image enhancement technology is often used to enhance the image and help radiologists.

Methods: This paper presents a comparative study in digital mammography image enhancement based on four different algorithms: wavelet-based enhancement (Asymmetric Daubechies of order 8), Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE), morphological operators and unsharp masking. These algorithms have been tested on 114 clinical digital mammography images. The comparison for all the proposed image enhancement techniques was carried out to find out the best technique in enhancement of the mammogram images to detect microcalcifications.

Results: For evaluation of performance of image enhancement algorithms, the Contrast Improvement Index (CII) and profile intensity surface area distribution curve quality assessment have been used after any enhancement. The results of this study have shown that the average of CII is about 2.61 for wavelet and for CLAHE, unsharp masking and morphology operation are about 2.047, 1.63 and 1.315 respectively.

Conclusion: Experimental results strongly suggest that the wavelet transformation can be more effective and improve significantly overall detection of the Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) system especially for dense breast. Compare to other studies, our method achieved a higher CII.

Fulltext

Full text is available in PDF.
 

Copyright

© 2012, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
Mar
2010

Effects of Enhancement Methods on Diagnostic Quality of Digital Mammogram Images

Mostafa Langarizadeh,
R Mahmud,
AR Ramli,
S Napis,
MR Beikzadeh,
WEZ Wan Abdul Rahman

Langarizadeh M, Mahmud R, Ramli A, Napis S, Beikzadeh M, et al. Effects of Enhancement Methods on Diagnostic Quality of Digital Mammogram Images. Int J Cancer Manag. 2010;3(1):e80655. doi:

19
Sep
2021
Iran J Radiol

An Efficient Method for Automated Breast Mass Segmentation and Classification in Digital Mammograms

Behrouz Niroomand Fam,
Alireza Nikravanshalmani,
Madjid Khalilian

Niroomand Fam B, Nikravanshalmani A, Khalilian M. An Efficient Method for Automated Breast Mass Segmentation and Classification in Digital Mammograms. I J Radiol. 2021;18(3):e106717. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.106717

15
Aug
2001

Discriminate of microcalcification in breast tissue with digital mammography: the presentation a new method of processing

Manizheh MokhtariDizaji

MokhtariDizaji M. Discriminate of microcalcification in breast tissue with digital mammography: the presentation a new method of processing. koomesh. 2001;2(3):e151935. doi:

22
Jul
2015

Ensemble Supervised Classification Method Using the Regions of Interest and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrices Features for Mammograms Data

Hossein Yousefibanaem,
Alireza Mehri Dehnavi,
Makhtum Shahnazi

Yousefibanaem H, Mehri Dehnavi A, Shahnazi M. Ensemble Supervised Classification Method Using the Regions of Interest and Grey Level Co-Occurrence Matrices Features for Mammograms Data. I J Radiol. 2015;12(3):e91069. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.11656

30
Apr
2024
I J Radiol

Automatic Classification of Cancerous Masses in Digital Mammograms Using Curvelet Analysis and Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network Model

Fereshteh Torabi Jafroudi,
Azadeh Kiani-Sarkaleh,
Mahyar Nirouei

Torabi Jafroudi F, Kiani-Sarkaleh A, Nirouei M. Automatic Classification of Cancerous Masses in Digital Mammograms Using Curvelet Analysis and Hybrid Genetic Algorithm-Artificial Neural Network Model. I J Radiol. 2024;21(2):e146102. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-146102

Download PDF545.77 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles