The present study investigated and compared histopathological and immunological changes in the coronary artery wall of patients with and without a history of PCI before undergoing CABG. Although the two groups were well matched in demographic characteristics and baseline cardiovascular risk factors, patients with previous PCI showed significantly higher expression of the inflammatory markers CD68 (macrophages) and CD45RO (T lymphocytes), as well as significantly increased expression of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a marker of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. In contrast, no significant differences were observed between the groups in extracellular matrix damage, collagen deposition, or endothelial injury, and atherosclerotic plaques were present in all patients. Furthermore, the interval between PCI and CABG (immediate versus within one week) did not influence the histopathological findings. Collectively, these findings suggest that PCI promotes a persistent inflammatory and proliferative response within the coronary artery wall without substantial structural disruption of the extracellular matrix.
The lack of significant differences in demographic characteristics and baseline clinical risk factors between the PCI and non-PCI groups strengthens the validity of our findings by minimizing the influence of potential confounders. Consequently, the observed histopathological differences are more likely to reflect the biological consequences of PCI itself than differences in patient characteristics or underlying cardiovascular risk profiles.
One of the principal findings of this study was the significantly greater infiltration of CD68-positive macrophages and CD45RO-positive T lymphocytes in coronary artery specimens from patients with previous PCI. These observations are consistent with the current understanding of the vascular response to mechanical injury. Immediately after PCI, endothelial disruption triggers platelet activation and the expression of adhesion molecules such as P-selectin, promoting the initial recruitment of circulating leukocytes (
15-
17). Stable leukocyte adhesion and transmigration are subsequently mediated by integrins, particularly Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18), expressed on neutrophils and monocytes (
18,
19). This inflammatory response is further amplified by chemokines, including monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), which recruits monocytes and activated T lymphocytes, and interleukin-8 (IL-8), which attracts neutrophils to the injured vessel wall (
20).
In addition to mechanical injury, the implanted stent itself may contribute to persistent vascular inflammation. Experimental studies have demonstrated that corrosion products, metal ions, and nanoparticles released from coronary stents can activate inflammatory pathways and promote neointimal remodeling, thereby contributing to in-stent restenosis (ISR) (
21-
24). Moreover, Shlofmitz et al. reported that local vascular inflammation, particularly in the presence of dyslipidemia, plays a central role in the progression of atherothrombosis and stimulates aggressive neointimal proliferation (
25). Therefore, the increased expression of CD68 and CD45RO observed in our study likely reflects the combined effects of mechanical vascular injury, chemokine-mediated leukocyte recruitment, and chronic immune activation induced by stent-related materials.
Another important finding was the significantly increased expression of α-SMA in the PCI group, indicating enhanced vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) activation and neointimal hyperplasia (
26). This observation highlights the distinction between native atherosclerosis and restenosis, which are biologically distinct processes. Although advanced atherosclerotic plaques were present in all patients, increased α-SMA expression was observed only in patients with prior PCI, suggesting that coronary intervention activates a specific proliferative pathway beyond the underlying atherosclerotic disease.
Several mechanisms may explain this proliferative response. First, vascular injury after PCI induces substantial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly through activation of NADPH oxidase (NOX), which directly stimulates VSMC migration and proliferation (
27). Second, although drug-eluting stents (DES) effectively inhibit neointimal growth, they may also delay endothelial regeneration and reduce nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability through impaired endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity (
28). Reduced NO signaling subsequently favors VSMC proliferation and vascular remodeling (
29,
30). Accordingly, the increased α-SMA expression observed in our study may represent a downstream consequence of persistent oxidative stress, impaired endothelial homeostasis, and enhanced smooth muscle cell proliferation after PCI.
Notably, no significant differences were found between the groups in collagen deposition, endothelial injury, or extracellular matrix damage. At first glance, these findings appear inconsistent with previous reports describing endothelial denudation after PCI (
28). However, this discrepancy may be explained by the limited sample size of the present study and the distinction between structural injury and functional endothelial impairment. Because all patients had advanced CAD requiring surgical revascularization, structural alterations of the vessel wall were expected in both groups. In contrast, prior PCI appears to induce predominantly functional changes characterized by reduced NO bioavailability, persistent endothelial dysfunction, and enhanced inflammatory signaling, rather than overt structural destruction of the extracellular matrix. Likewise, alterations in the nanomechanical properties of vascular and inflammatory cells, such as increased cellular stiffness (Young's modulus), may occur independently of gross histological disruption (
31-
33). Thus, our findings suggest that PCI primarily modifies the biological behavior of the coronary artery wall rather than its overall structural integrity.
We also found no significant differences in histopathological findings between patients undergoing immediate CABG and those undergoing surgery within one week after PCI. This observation is biologically plausible because leukocyte recruitment through P-selectin and Mac-1 signaling occurs rapidly after vascular injury (
33), while ROS generation and NO depletion begin almost immediately after coronary intervention (
27). These early inflammatory responses may quickly reach a plateau and persist during the short interval before surgery, thereby explaining the comparable expression of inflammatory and proliferative markers in both subgroups.
5.1. Study Limitations
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, the type of implanted coronary stent was not recorded or incorporated into the analysis. Differences among bare-metal stents (BMS), first- and newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), and their polymer coatings may substantially influence vascular inflammation and smooth muscle cell proliferation, potentially affecting the expression of markers such as CD68 and α-SMA. Second, because tissue samples were obtained only at the time of CABG, longitudinal evaluation of histopathological changes after PCI was not feasible, and the findings represent a single time point rather than the temporal evolution of vascular remodeling. Finally, although the selected immunohistochemical markers provided valuable insight into inflammatory and proliferative responses, more comprehensive molecular analyses—including evaluation of ROS- and NO-related signaling pathways at the proteomic or transcriptomic level—were beyond the scope of the present study.
5.2. Conclusions
In conclusion, prior PCI was associated with persistent inflammatory cell infiltration and enhanced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation within the coronary artery wall of patients subsequently undergoing CABG. Specifically, prior PCI was associated with increased expression of CD68, CD45RO, and α-SMA without significant alterations in extracellular matrix integrity or collagen deposition. These findings suggest that PCI transforms the coronary artery wall from a chronically diseased vessel into a biologically active inflammatory and proliferative environment, which may have implications for vascular healing and the quality of coronary anastomoses during subsequent CABG. Further studies with larger cohorts and detailed molecular characterization are warranted to clarify the long-term clinical significance of these histopathological alterations.