Cover image of the article: A Study on the Association Between Air Pollutants and COVID-19 Across Different Provinces in Iran

Image Credit:Int J Infect

A Study on the Association Between Air Pollutants and COVID-19 Across Different Provinces in Iran

Authors

Leili Mohamadi1, Hamid DahmardehHamid Dahmardeh ORCID2,*, Zahra Dahmardeh3, Reza Abbasi RayeniReza Abbasi Rayeni ORCID4, Bita MoudiBita Moudi ORCID1,**, Seyed Mohammad Mousavi3, Mahdi Koolaji3
1Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Research Institute of Cellular and Molecular Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2Department of Radiology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
4Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
Corresponding Authors:
*Corresponding Author: Department of Radiology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. Email: dr.hamid.dahmardeh@gmail.com
**Corresponding Author: Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Research Institute of Cellular and Molecular Sciences in Infectious Diseases, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran. Email: bita.moudi@yahoo.com

International Journal of Infection:Vol. 13, issue 2; e167436
Published online:Jul 31, 2026
Article type:Research Article
Received:Dec 17, 2025
Accepted:Jul 18, 2026
How to Cite:Mohamadi L, Dahmardeh H, Dahmardeh Z, Abbasi Rayeni R, Moudi B, et al. A Study on the Association Between Air Pollutants and COVID-19 Across Different Provinces in Iran. Int J Infect. 2026;13(2):e167436. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iji-167436

Abstract

Background:

Examining the potential association between the quantity and quality of air pollutants and COVID-19 prevalence may help inform prevention and monitoring strategies.

Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate the ecological association between air pollution levels and COVID-19 cases across the provinces of Iran.

Methods:

This ecological study used data collected from February 20 to April 20, 2020, in 31 provinces in Iran. Meteorological data, including average concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), were obtained from Iran’s meteorological system. The number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in each province was compared with air pollution parameters using Pearson correlation coefficients and multivariate linear regression adjusted for population density.

Results:

Most provinces reported high CO concentrations (16.68 - 28.78 mg/m3). High PM10 levels were observed in southeastern Iran, high SO2 levels in the southeast and northwest, and high PM2.5 levels in the southwest, central, and northeast regions. Significant ecological correlations were observed between several air pollutants, particularly PM2.5 and PM10, and provincial COVID-19 case counts.

Conclusions:

Significant ecological correlations were observed between several air pollutants, particularly PM2.5 and PM10, and provincial COVID-19 case counts. These findings suggest that air pollution modeling may help identify high-risk regions, although causation cannot be inferred at the individual level. Temporary reductions in traffic and industrial activities during the pandemic peak were associated with decreased levels of several air pollutants, indicating interactions among human activity, air quality, and infectious disease dynamics.

1. Background

Growing industrial activity and extensive consumption of nonrenewable energy sources have substantially increased air pollution, adversely affecting urban populations through respiratory disease and the exacerbation of heart and lung disease (1). Meteorological factors such as humidity, sunshine duration, temperature, pressure, and solar radiation can influence atmospheric pollutant concentrations and their adverse effects on populations and ecosystems (1).
Geography and the geological structure of a region are important determinants of health and disease. From this perspective, a country's geological structure also influences basic human needs, including water, food, respiration, and shelter (2). Geological factors such as rocks, elements, mines, and minerals may affect people directly or indirectly; therefore, health and disease patterns may vary across geographic regions. Medical geology, as a scientific field, examines the positive and negative effects of the geological environment on the health of humans, animals, and plants. Factors such as temperature, humidity, pressure, wind direction, and cold are also considered in medical geography. In addition, this field examines relationships between planetary events and disease development, including causes and consequences (3). General atmospheric circulation influences pollutant concentrations and can exacerbate harmful effects on ecosystems and individuals. Changes in atmospheric gas composition can affect terrestrial life and disrupt ecological balance. Human activities have also contributed substantially to climate change, threatening human health and ecosystems (4).
Air pollution is a major environmental health risk. Particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5) contributes to approximately 2 million premature deaths annually and has been ranked as the 13th leading cause of mortality worldwide (5). Even low levels of air pollutants have been associated with increased cardiorespiratory disease (6).
Exposure to air pollution, particularly particulate matter with diameters smaller than 10 μm (PM10) and 2.5 μm (PM2.5), has received substantial attention because of its potential associations with cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (4, 7-9). A previous study showed greater susceptibility to viruses in a group exposed to NO2 than in a control group, and a study conducted in Beijing from 2008 to 2014 found that air pollutants increased the risk of influenza (10, 11).
In December 2019, numerous cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology were detected in Wuhan, China. Molecular analysis of samples from affected patients showed infection with a novel coronavirus, later named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (12). Within 5 months, the disease had affected more than 210 countries and developed into a global pandemic with major public health consequences (13).
Extensive research into the pathogenesis of COVID-19 suggests that severe disease may result from an excessive inflammatory response (14), but the exact predisposing factors contributing to greater clinical severity and mortality remain unclear. Because chronic exposure to air pollution increases respiratory and cardiovascular toxicity (15), air pollution has been hypothesized to contribute to COVID-19 severity (16, 17). Early reports indicated that geographic patterns of COVID-19 transmission and mortality across and within countries were associated with local air pollutant levels (17).

2. Objectives

This study examined the relationships between climatic factors, including temperature, pressure, and humidity, and atmospheric pollutants, including CO, SO2, NO2, O3, hydrocarbons, PM10, and PM2.5, and the prevalence of COVID-19 in Iran. This study provides a nationwide ecological analysis of associations between air pollutants and COVID-19 across 31 Iranian provinces during the early phase of the pandemic, using real-time monitoring data rather than model-based estimates.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Setting

This ecological study was conducted across 31 Iranian provinces in which substantial COVID-19 outbreaks were reported. Iran is located in Southwest Asia and includes extensive mountainous and desert regions. Eastern Iran is dominated by a high plateau with large salt flats and broad sandy deserts; the plateau is surrounded by higher mountain ranges, including the Zagros Mountains in the west and the Alborz Mountains in the north. Figure 1 shows the geographic location of the Iranian provinces.
Map of the geographical location of Iran's provinces
Figure 1.
Map of the geographical location of Iran's provinces

3.2. Data Sources and Measurements

Data on air pollutants were obtained from meteorological monitoring stations, and officially reported COVID-19 case counts were obtained from the websites of the Iranian Ministry of Health and provincial health centers. Weather conditions and COVID-19 case counts were compared during the same observation period. A publicly available database was used, and no human participants were directly involved in this study, in accordance with the relevant regulations of the US Department of Health and Human Services. The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
The study used regional- and subregional-level information to estimate the relationship between air pollution and COVID-19 in Iran, following the general approach described previously (18).
Weather information, including temperature, pressure, humidity, and radiation, was obtained from provincial meteorological stations for the study period from February 20 to April 20, 2020. Air quality index (AQI) data were also obtained. Across air-quality monitoring stations, beta attenuation monitoring, UV fluorescence, infrared absorption, chemiluminescence, and UV spectrophotometry were used to measure PM10, PM2.5, SO2, CO, NO2, and O3, respectively.
The permissible limits for major air pollutants are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Air Pollution Standards
Air Pollution Standards (WHO)Standard DurationConcentrationAir Pollution Standards in Iran a
CO8 hours9 mg/m39 mg/m3
CO1 hour35 mg/m335 mg/m3
SO224 hours140 μg/m3100 μg/m3
SO2Annually31 μg/m320 μg/m3
NO21 hour210 μg/m340 μg/m3
NO2Annually53 μg/m3-
O31 hour12 mg/m30.05 mg/m3
PM1024 hours150 μg/m350 μg/m3
PM10Annually50 μg/m320 μg/m3
PbTrimester1.5 μg/m30.5 μg/m3
THC (NMHC)3 hours0.24 ppm1 ng/m3
a Iran's clean-air standards approved in August 2018.
Table 2 lists the standard pollutant index limits (19). The AQI is an indicator developed by government agencies to communicate current or forecast air pollution and its associated public health risk. As the AQI increases, health risks also increase. Children, older adults, and individuals with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions are typically among the first groups affected by poor air quality. When the AQI is high, authorities generally advise people to reduce outdoor physical activity or avoid outdoor exposure. During wildfire-related episodes of high AQI, the use of an N95 respirator outdoors and an air purifier with high-efficiency particulate air and activated-carbon filters indoors may also be encouraged (20).
Table 2.
Pollutant Standards Index Values
Weather ConditionsPSI Values
Clean0 - 50
Allowed51 - 100
Unhealthy101 - 199
Very unhealthy200 - 299
Dangerous300
Table 3 presents the conversion of pollutant concentrations to the standard pollutant index (21). The pollutant standards index (PSI) is based on 6 pollutants: CO, SO2, NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2.5. For each pollutant, a subindex is calculated using a segmented linear function that transforms ambient concentrations to a scale from 0 to 500. In this study, daily reports of all air pollutants recorded at monitoring stations in provincial centers were obtained, and monthly averages were used in the analysis. Figure 2 shows the average levels of several air pollutants across Iran.
Table 3.
Converting Pollutant Concentrations to the Standard Indicator of Pollutants
PSIIndex CategoriesCO, 8 h (mg/m3)SO2, 24 h (μg/m3)NO2, 1 h (μg/m3)O3, 1 h (mg/m3)PM10, 24 h (μg/m3)PM2.5, 24 h (μg/m3)
0 - 50Good0 - 5.00 - 8000 - 1180 - 500 - 12
51 - 100Moderate5.1 - 1080 - 3650119 - 15751 - 15013 - 55
101 - 200Unhealthy10.1 - 17.0366 - 8001130158 - 235151 - 35056 - 150
201 - 300Very unhealthy17.1 - 34.0800 - 16001131 - 2260236 - 785351 - 420151 - 250
> 300Hazardous> 35> 1600> 2260> 786> 421> 251
Average status of various air pollutants in different provinces of Iran (February 20 to April 20, 2020)
Figure 2.
Average status of various air pollutants in different provinces of Iran (February 20 to April 20, 2020)

3.3. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of the distribution of each pollutant and the number of COVID-19 cases was first examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Because the data were normally distributed (data not shown), Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess linear relationships between each pollutant and the number of COVID-19 cases at the provincial level. Results are reported as correlation coefficients (r), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P values.
Multivariate linear regression models were then used to adjust for demographic confounding. The dependent variable was the number of COVID-19 cases in each province. Independent variables included mean concentrations of CO, SO2, NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2.5, with population density included as a confounding variable. Results are reported as unstandardized beta coefficients (B) with 95% CIs. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

3.4. Methodological Limitations

Because of the ecological study design and limited access to individual-level data, it was not possible to adjust for age, underlying diseases, travel patterns, testing and reporting rates, or quarantine measures. Population density was included in the regression model as the principal regional-level confounder.

4. Results

4.1. Descriptive Statistics of Air Pollutants

More than half of urban air pollution is attributed to CO from incomplete fuel combustion in vehicle engines. Carbon monoxide binds strongly to hemoglobin, forming carboxyhemoglobin and reducing oxygen transport. Exposure may lead to headaches, nausea, visual disturbances, and palpitations.
The 8-hour standard concentration for CO was 9 ppm. According to data from the national air-quality monitoring system, CO pollution was higher on March 11 than on other days, with the highest levels observed in Tehran, Ahvaz, and Bandar Abbas. As shown in Figure 3A, average CO levels remained high until March 18 and decreased from March 19 through April 19. Possible reasons for this reduction include temporary industrial closures and reduced traffic during the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as the Nowruz holidays.
Variation in air pollutants in different provinces of Iran: (A) CO, (B) SO<sub>2</sub>, (C) NO<sub>2</sub>, and (D) O<sub>3</sub>
Figure 3.
Variation in air pollutants in different provinces of Iran: (A) CO, (B) SO2, (C) NO2, and (D) O3
According to Table 3, the CO concentration during this period was in the moderate range and would have entered the unhealthy range with an increase of approximately 1 mg/m3.

4.2. Sulfur Dioxide

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless gas released through fossil-fuel combustion. It dissolves in water and raindrops and can form sulfur trioxide and sulfuric acid in the atmosphere. Inhalation of sulfuric acid combined with soot, suspended particles, and smoke may contribute to respiratory injury. Sulfur dioxide exposure has also been associated with anxiety and mental health effects.
Figure 3B shows SO2 levels across Iranian provinces. The reported values did not exceed the standard. SO2 increased until March 6 and decreased starting on March 7. It increased slightly from March 22 to April 3 and again after April 4, with a sharper increase on April 16 and a peak on April 20. One possible explanation is fossil-fuel consumption for industry and household heating. Higher pollution levels were reported in Arak, Qazvin, Urmia, and Ardabil, where lower temperatures may increase household heating demand, particularly during periods when residents remained at home because of pandemic-related closures.

4.3. Nitrogen Oxides

Measurements across Iranian provinces showed that NO and NO2 did not exceed the reported standard limit of 120 ppb during the study period. As shown in Figure 3C, NO2 increased until March 13 and then decreased through April 18, possibly because of pandemic-related closures. Levels began to increase again on April 19 and rose sharply on April 20. The highest values were observed in Mashhad, whereas Khorramabad and Tehran also had relatively high NO2 levels.

4.4. Hydrocarbons and Volatile Organic Compounds

Although hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are important pollutants, they were not measured in the meteorological reports. Therefore, daily trends could not be evaluated.

4.5. Ozone and Other Oxidants

The permissible concentration of tropospheric ozone was reported as 12 ppb per hour. Ozone levels were higher on March 1 and March 5 than on other days, with the highest levels observed in Hamadan, Yazd, Shiraz, and Bandar Abbas (Figure 3D). Ozone levels decreased with reductions in nitrogen oxide production during industrial closures and reduced traffic. A marked decrease was observed after April 9, followed by an increase on April 20.

4.6. Particulate Matter

The highest PM10 levels during the study period were observed on February 27 and March 2 in Iranshahr, Zabol, and Khorramabad; the March 2 value in Khorramabad was markedly higher than values in other locations. The highest PM2.5 levels were observed on February 25 and 28 in Iranshahr and Bandar Abbas. The highest PSI values, mainly related to PM2.5, were observed in Iranshahr and Zabol.
According to the PSI, 62% of the study days were in the allowable range and 38% were in the clean range (Figure 4). These areas were affected by dust storms during the study period, resulting in higher concentrations of suspended particles. The highest reported PM2.5 value was 94.28 μg/m3, and the highest PM10 value was 80.95 μg/m3. According to Table 3, PM2.5 was in the unhealthy range and PM10 was in the moderate range.
Variation in air pollutants in different provinces of Iran: (A) PM<sub>10</sub>, (B) PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and (C) PSI values
Figure 4.
Variation in air pollutants in different provinces of Iran: (A) PM10, (B) PM2.5, and (C) PSI values
The permissible limit for airborne particles was reported as 150 μg/m3. The highest pollution level was observed in Khorramabad on March 2. During the study period, SO2 and NO2 levels did not exceed the reported standards, whereas CO and suspended particles contributed substantially to air pollution.

4.7. Correlation and Regression Analyses

The relationships between the studied pollutants and COVID-19 cases are shown in Table 4. PM2.5 showed the strongest positive correlation with COVID-19 cases (r = 0.824, 95% CI, 0.636 - 0.928; P < 0.001), followed by PM10 (r = 0.796, 95% CI, 0.592 - 0.912; P < 0.001). CO (r = 0.333, 95% CI, 0.011 - 0.598; P = 0.031), SO2 (r = 0.391, 95% CI, 0.074 - 0.645; P = 0.015), and NO2 (r = 0.324, 95% CI, 0.002 - 0.591; P = 0.038) showed moderate positive correlations. O3 showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.796, 95% CI, -0.912 to -0.592; P < 0.001). These analyses were based on daily pollutant averages across the 31 provinces, compared with average provincial COVID-19 case counts.
Table 4.
Statistical Correlations Between Air Pollutants and the Number of Patients with COVID-19 a
PollutantCorrelation Coefficient (r)95% Confidence IntervalP-Value
CO0.3330.011 - 0.5980.031
SO20.3910.074 - 0.6450.015
NO20.3240.002 - 0.5910.038
O3-0.796-0.912 - -0.592< 0.001
PM100.7960.592 - 0.912< 0.001
PM2.50.8240.636 - 0.928< 0.001
a Pearson correlation was used after normality was confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P > 0.05 for all variables). N = 31 provinces. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4.8. Spatial Distribution of COVID-19 Cases

COVID-19 case counts during the study period were summarized for all 31 provinces. Daily incidence was presented graphically in Figure 5A, and the geographic distribution of cases during the study period was mapped in Figure 5B (Tables 5 and 6).
(A) Statistical chart and (B) distribution map of people with COVID-19 during the study period
Figure 5.
(A) Statistical chart and (B) distribution map of people with COVID-19 during the study period
Table 5.
Descriptive Statistics on Province-Level COVID-19 Outbreak and Long-Term Air Pollution Levels in 31 Provinces
ProvincePopulationTotal CasesCases Per 100,000 PopulationMean CO (ppm)Mean SO2 (ppb)Mean NO2 (ppb)Mean O3 (ppb)Mean PM10 (μg/m3)Mean PM2.5 (μg/m3)
East Azerbaijan390965262916.0930 ± 2530 ± 2441 ± 3421 ± 1047 ± 4476 ± 41
Western Azerbaijan32652193269.9855 ± 1032 ± 2364 ± 2962 ± 25
Ardabil127042022918.036 ± 632 ± 72524 ± 1925
Esfahan5120850164632.1451 ± 3131131131102 ± 30
Alborz271240096735.65696918 ± 760 ± 974 ± 30
Ilam580158-0.00373739 ± 4652 ± 26
Bushehr1163400544.6412012068 ± 50103 ± 40
Tehran13267637439733.1430 ± 1034 ± 1661 ± 2632 ± 553 ± 3381 ± 40
Chaharmahal va Bakhtiari947763616.4431 ± 172351 ± 262737 ± 3423
Southern Khorasan76889814518.866 ± 3505028 ± 633 ± 7642 ± 19
Khorasan Razavi643450171111.0524 ± 1225 ± 2261 ± 3343 ± 3381 ± 45
North Khorasan86309212114.0223131356 ± 8839 ± 30
Khuzestan4710509-0.0031 ± 1729 ± 672 ± 1938 ± 1071 ± 70110 ± 43
Zanjan105746128727.1412 ± 84744 ± 1512 ± 943 ± 1950 ± 23
Semnan70236059384.4336 ± 1722 ± 546 ± 2061 ± 335950 ± 15
Sistan and Baluchestan27750141063.82739564 ± 67135 ± 100
Fars48512744078.3932 ± 1722 ± 552 ± 3291 ± 6068 ± 2076 ± 30
Qazvin127376157344.9825 ± 869 ± 1545 ± 231766 ± 1369
Qom1292283110585.5116 ± 815 ± 920 ± 2811 ± 255 ± 75120 ± 50
Kurdistan160301120012.4823 ± 321 ± 2017 ± 626 ± 1634 ± 15
Kerman31647181414.4612912994 ± 3485 ± 50
Kermanshah19524341588.0918 ± 1036 ± 1431 ± 1844 ± 2644 ± 1450
Kohkiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad713052608.41
Golestan186861936019.2718 ± 121714
Gilan253069699739.4022 ± 1030 ± 2319 ± 1070 ± 6273
Lorestan176064940022.7217 ± 1150 ± 3067 ± 3621 ± 328 ± 3447 ± 35
Mazandaran3283582150345.77
Markazi142947582957.9934 ± 1262 ± 3031 ± 2532 ± 1076 ± 4767 ± 32
Hormozgan17764151297.2631 ± 1645 ± 925 ± 1152 ± 1915 ± 20100 ± 63
Hamedan17582681759.9520 ± 1042 ± 849 ± 3142 ± 3065 ± 3265 ± 28
Yazd113853354047.4327 ± 18717138 ± 2064 ± 3071
Table 6.
Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis of Associations Between Air Pollutants and COVID-19 Cases, Adjusted for Population Density a
PollutantUnstandardized Coefficient (B)95% Confidence IntervalStandardized Coefficient (Beta)P-Value
CO12.45-3.21 - 28.110.210.118
SO28.76-1.54 - 19.060.190.094
NO25.23-4.87 - 15.330.140.302
O3-18.92-35.64 - -2.20-0.410.028
PM100.520.31 - 0.730.560.001
PM2.50.480.27 - 0.690.520.002
a Dependent variable: number of confirmed COVID-19 cases per province. Model adjusted for population density (people per km2). R2 = 0.68 (adjusted R2 = 0.62). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

5. Discussion

5.1. Interpretation of Findings and Comparison with Previous Studies

In this ecological study, we investigated the associations between ambient air pollutants and COVID-19 prevalence across 31 Iranian provinces. Significant positive ecological correlations were observed between particulate matter, particularly PM2.5 and PM10, and provincial COVID-19 case counts.

5.1.1. Carbon Monoxide

Previous studies have reported mixed findings. Nhung et al. reported a negative association between CO and bronchitis and asthma (22). In contrast, Li et al. found that increased levels of several pollutants, including CO, were associated with increased hospital visits for upper respiratory tract infections among children aged 0 - 14 years (23). A study conducted in Jinan, China, from 2016 to 2017 also reported associations between exposure to PM2.5, PM10, and CO and influenza-like illness among children aged 0 - 4 and 4 - 14 years (24).

5.1.2. Sulfur Dioxide

A longitudinal study of 343 children exposed to sulfur dioxide and particulate sulfate was conducted in 3 Arizona towns, 2 of which had smelters (25). The study period was 1979 - 1982. Annual mean SO2 concentrations at 2 monitoring sites were 0.005 ppm and 0.04 ppm. In the area with the highest pollution, children were intermittently exposed to high SO2 levels, with peak 3-hour means exceeding 1 ppm, as well as moderate levels of particulate sulfate. Cough prevalence was significantly correlated with pollution levels, although lung function did not change significantly over 3 years (26).
Because SO2 is soluble in water and respiratory mucus, the upper respiratory tract is particularly affected. In the presence of suspended particles, surface adsorption or particle interactions may facilitate deeper penetration into the lungs, potentially exacerbating pulmonary lesions and other complications (27). Sulfur dioxide exposure can cause respiratory symptoms and increase airway resistance. Animal studies have shown that prolonged SO2 exposure can cause goblet-cell changes, epithelial hyperplasia, and hypertrophy of submucosal glands (28). Such airway epithelial injury resembles chronic bronchitis in humans. Individual sensitivity to SO2 varies, and people with asthma may be particularly vulnerable (29).
Since 2013, air quality in many Chinese cities has improved, with substantial decreases in PM2.5, PM10, and SO2 concentrations (30). These policies have also yielded health benefits. Liang et al. reported that, compared with 2013 levels, SO2 and PM2.5 concentrations in 2017 were 68% and 33% lower, respectively, alongside a decreasing trend in acute exacerbations of COPD associated with PM2.5 exposure (31). Nevertheless, air quality has not consistently met WHO standards; particulate matter concentrations remain high in some areas, O3 concentrations have increased, and NO2 concentrations have remained relatively stable.

5.1.3. Nitrogen Oxides

Nitrogen oxides can irritate the respiratory tract and eyes, increase airway resistance, reduce pulmonary gas-diffusion capacity, and contribute to pneumonia, acute bronchitis, cough, dyspnea, lethargy, and fatigue. Some of these manifestations overlap with respiratory symptoms of COVID-19, while COVID-19 itself can cause substantial pulmonary injury (32, 33).
Khajeamiri et al. reported that NO2 was a major air pollutant associated with daily outpatient visits for upper respiratory tract infections (28). Frampton et al. examined the ability of human alveolar macrophages to inactivate influenza virus after exposure to NO2 and air. Alveolar macrophages obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage after continuous NO2 exposure showed reduced influenza-virus inactivation compared with cells obtained after air exposure (34).
Kowalska et al. observed the strongest association between NO2 concentration and outpatient visits for bronchitis and reported that increases in mean daily NO2 concentration increased the risk of bronchitis (35, 28). Schikowski et al. analyzed associations of annual mean particulate matter and NOx concentrations with COPD prevalence during a 3-year follow-up period from 2008 to 2011; neither NO2 nor particulate matter was significantly associated with COPD prevalence in the cohort analysis or meta-analysis (36).

5.1.4. Hydrocarbons and Volatile Organic Compounds

Hydrocarbons and VOCs are important because some compounds are carcinogenic and contribute to the formation of photochemical oxidants (37). Aromatic hydrocarbons have been associated with lung cancer, while photochemical smog can irritate the eyes and mucous membranes and affect hematopoietic tissues (38).

5.1.5. Ozone and Other Oxidants

Nitrogen dioxide can photodissociate to form atomic oxygen, which then combines with molecular oxygen to generate ozone, a strong oxidant (39).
NO2 → NO + O
O + O2 → O3
Tropospheric ozone exposure has been associated with pulmonary complications and impaired lung function (40). Epidemiologic studies have associated concentrations of 200 μg/m3 or less with decreased lung function in children, and these effects may be aggravated by heat and other pollutants. Even low ozone concentrations have been associated with pulmonary effects, whereas high-ozone conditions have been associated with early fatigue and reduced exercise performance.
Zoran et al. evaluated ground-level O3 and NO2 in relation to COVID-19 in Milan, Italy. They reported positive relationships between daily average O3 and air temperature and inverse relationships with relative humidity and precipitation. They also discussed the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 may interact with ambient air pollution (33).
Wong et al. examined the effects of SO2, NO2, O3, and PM10 on outcomes among patients with influenza in 4 Asian cities. Ozone appeared to have more pronounced associations with mortality and hospitalization than the other pollutants, potentially because of overlap between the influenza season and periods of elevated pollutant concentrations. Patients with preexisting influenza exposed to O3 may develop respiratory complications, including acute respiratory disease and COPD (41).
Zhu et al. reported that a 10 μg/m3 increase in ozone concentration was associated with an increase in daily confirmed COVID-19 cases (42). In 2015, 8% of total deaths worldwide were attributed to O3 exposure, including 254,000 deaths due to COPD (43). A large prospective cohort study in the United States reported that long-term O3 exposure was associated with increased COPD mortality, with a risk ratio of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.03 - 1.15) for each 10-ppb increase in annual mean O3 concentration (44).

5.2. Physiological Mechanisms

Previous studies have suggested that, during exercise, increased tidal volume and oral breathing may bypass nasal filtration and allow pollutants to penetrate more deeply into the respiratory tract (45-48). Greater airflow velocity may carry pollutants deeper into the airways, where they may diffuse into the bloodstream or promote cardiovascular inflammation (49, 50). Thus, exercise under conditions of moderate air pollution may counteract some benefits of physical activity. This mechanism may partly explain increased susceptibility in physically active individuals, although the ecological design of the present study did not permit direct assessment of this pathway.
Exposure to suspended particles may impair vascular reactivity, accelerate the formation of atherosclerotic plaques, contribute to thrombotic events, and increase ischemic cardiac activity (51, 52).

5.3. Particulate Matter

Ciencewicki and Jaspers reviewed epidemiologic evidence on air pollution and respiratory viral infections and described associations between high particulate matter concentrations in urban areas and mortality from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Elevated exposure to ambient particulate matter may alter host immunity to respiratory viral infections (53). A study conducted in Shanghai, China, found that daily COPD mortality was significantly associated with particle number concentrations for particles smaller than 0.5 μm and that the magnitude of the association increased as particle size decreased (54).
A study from northern Italy suggested that high levels of air pollution may have contributed to the spread of COVID-19. Atmospheric particulate matter may remain suspended for prolonged periods and can travel long distances. The cited research discussed potential relationships among atmospheric particulate matter, relative humidity, and SARS-CoV-2 transmission, noting that northern Italian areas heavily affected by COVID-19 also had PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations above legislative standards (55).

5.4. Study Limitations

This study has several important limitations. First, this was an ecological study based on aggregate-level data; therefore, individual-level causation cannot be inferred, and the ecological fallacy must be avoided. Second, the COVID-19 data were obtained during the early phase of the pandemic, from February 20 to April 20, 2020. These findings may not be generalizable to the entire pandemic because testing capacity, reporting practices, public health interventions, and viral variants changed over time. Third, several important confounders could not be adjusted for because of data limitations, including age distribution, underlying comorbidities, socioeconomic status, mobility patterns, lockdown compliance, COVID-19 testing capacity, reporting rates, and vaccination coverage, although vaccines were not available during the study period. Fourth, correlation does not imply causation. The observed ecological correlations do not establish that air pollution directly increases viral transmission or disease severity without experimental or individual-level longitudinal data. Finally, VOCs and hydrocarbons were not measured in the meteorological reports, and their potential associations with COVID-19 could not be assessed.

5.5. Recommendations and Future Directions

Improving air-quality indicators, reducing personal exposure to pollutants, and improving fuel and engine technologies may help reduce air pollution and its cardiovascular and mortality consequences. Future research should use individual-level longitudinal designs, control for a comprehensive set of confounders, and investigate underlying biological mechanisms. Such research could strengthen individualized patient care and provide evidence to support effective public-health measures to reduce air pollution.

5.6. Conclusions

This ecological study investigated the associations between ambient air pollutants and COVID-19 prevalence across 31 Iranian provinces during the early phase of the pandemic, from February 20 to April 20, 2020. Significant positive ecological correlations were observed between particulate matter, particularly PM2.5 and PM10, and provincial COVID-19 case counts.
Carbon monoxide pollution was highest on March 11, with the highest reported levels in Tehran, Ahvaz, and Bandar Abbas. Reported SO2 and NOx concentrations did not exceed the stated standard limits. The highest PM10 concentrations were observed on February 27 and March 2 in Iranshahr, Zabol, and Khorramabad, whereas the highest PM2.5 concentrations were observed on February 25 and 28 in Iranshahr and Bandar Abbas. According to the PSI, 62% of the study days were within the allowable range and 38% were in the clean range.
PM2.5 showed the strongest correlation with COVID-19 cases (r = 0.824; P < 0.001), followed by PM10 (r = 0.796; P < 0.001). After adjustment for population density, multivariate linear regression showed that PM10 (B = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.73; P = 0.001) and PM2.5 (B = 0.48, 95% CI, 0.27 - 0.69; P = 0.002) remained significant independent predictors of provincial COVID-19 case counts.
Temporary industrial closures and reduced vehicle traffic during the early pandemic period were associated with decreases in several air pollutants, including CO, SO2, NO2, and O3. These changes did not affect natural particulate pollutants such as PM10 and PM2.5 originating from dust storms in southeastern Iran. The findings suggest an interaction among human activity, air quality, and infectious-disease dynamics. Air-pollution modeling may help identify regions at higher risk during future respiratory-disease outbreaks and may support monitoring, containment, early-warning systems, and resource allocation.
Because of the ecological study design, individual-level causation cannot be inferred. Air-quality monitoring and pollution-control measures may nevertheless contribute to pandemic preparedness, while stronger study designs, including individual-level longitudinal studies with comprehensive control of confounding, are needed to clarify the relationships between air pollution and respiratory viral infections. Continued efforts to improve air quality may yield both environmental and public-health benefits. Measures may include modification of industrial activities, promotion of public transportation, expansion of green spaces, and transition to cleaner energy sources.

Footnotes

  • AI Use Disclosure:The authors declare that no generative AI tools were used in the creation of this article.

  • Authors' Contribution:L. M.: Conceptualization, methodology, and writing-original draft; H. D.: Methodology and data curation; Z. D.: Writing-review and editing; R. A. R., S. M. M., and M. K.: Investigation and validation; B. M.: Supervision, conceptualization, and writing-review and editing.

  • Conflict of Interests Statement:The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests.

  • Data Availability:The dataset presented in the study is available on request from the corresponding author during submission or after publication.

  • Ethical Approval:IR.ZAUMS.REC.1399.381.

  • Funding/Support:The work was supported by a research grant from Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran (IR.ZAUMS.REC.1399.381).

References

  • 1.
    D'amato G, Liccardi G, D'amato M, Cazzola M. The role of outdoor air pollution and climatic changes on the rising trends in respiratory allergy. Respiratory Medicine. 2001;95(7):606-11. [PubMed ID: 11453319]. https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.2001.1112.
  • 2.
    Can I. Medical Geology as a New Field of Study in Medical Sociology. The Eurasia Proceedings of Health, Environment and Life Sciences. 2022;5:93-7. https://doi.org/10.55549/ephels.58.
  • 3.
    Greiner AN, Hellings PW, Rotiroti G, Scadding GK. Allergic rhinitis. The Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2112-22. [PubMed ID: 21783242]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60130-X.
  • 4.
    Szyszkowicz M. Urban air pollution and mental, eye, digestive, and musculoskeletal health problems in Toronto, Canada. Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances. 2022;3. 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heha.2022.100008.
  • 5.
    Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095-128. [PubMed ID: 23245604]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10790329]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
  • 6.
    Schwartz J, Bind MA, Koutrakis P. Estimating causal effects of local air pollution on daily deaths: effect of low levels. Environmental health perspectives. 2017;125(1):23-9. [PubMed ID: 27203595]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5226700]. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP232.
  • 7.
    Arsalane K, Broeckaert F, Knoops B, Clippe A, Buchet JP, Bernard A. Increased serum and urinary concentrations of lung clara cell protein in rats acutely exposed to ozone. Toxicology and applied pharmacology. 1999;159(3):169-74. [PubMed ID: 10486303]. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1999.8738.
  • 8.
    Fiorito G, Vlaanderen J, Polidoro S, Gulliver J, Galassi C, Ranzi A, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate the effect of air pollution on cardio‐and cerebrovascular disease: a prospective study in nonsmokers. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. 2018;59(3):234-46. [PubMed ID: 29114965]. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22153.
  • 9.
    Hamra GB, Laden F, Cohen AJ, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Brauer M, Loomis D. Lung cancer and exposure to nitrogen dioxide and traffic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environmental health perspectives. 2015;123(11):1107-12. [PubMed ID: 25870974]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4629738]. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408882.
  • 10.
    Feng C, Li J, Sun W, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Impact of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure on the risk of influenza-like-illness: a time-series analysis in Beijing, China. Environmental Health. 2016;15(1). 17. [PubMed ID: 26864833]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4750357]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0115-2.
  • 11.
    Wang W, Zhao C, Dong C, Yu H, Wang Y, Yang X. Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach in air pollution control policy effective? Evidence from the action plan for air pollution prevention and control in China. Science of The Total Environment. 2022;843. 156850. [PubMed ID: 35738375]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156850.
  • 12.
    Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England journal of medicine. 2020;382(8):727-33. [PubMed ID: 31978945]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7092803]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.
  • 13.
    Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. jama. 2020;323(11):1061-9. [PubMed ID: 32031570]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7042881]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
  • 14.
    Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nature reviews immunology. 2020;20(5):269-70. [PubMed ID: 32273594]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7143200]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0308-3.
  • 15.
    Faustini A, Rapp R, Forastiere F. Nitrogen dioxide and mortality: review and meta-analysis of long-term studies. European Respiratory Journal. 2014;44(3):744-53. [PubMed ID: 24558178]. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00114713.
  • 16.
    Brandt EB, Beck AF, Mersha TB. Air pollution, racial disparities, and COVID-19 mortality. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2020;146(1):61-3. [PubMed ID: 32389591]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7204717]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.035.
  • 17.
    Conticini E, Frediani B, Caro D. Can atmospheric pollution be considered a co-factor in extremely high level of SARS-CoV-2 lethality in Northern Italy? Environmental pollution. Environmental Pollution. 2020;261. 114465. [PubMed ID: 32268945]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7128509]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114465.
  • 18.
    Travaglio M, Yu Y, Popovic R, Selley L, Leal NS, Martins LM. Links between air pollution and COVID-19 in England. Environmental pollution. 2021;268. 115859. [PubMed ID: 33120349]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7571423]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115859.
  • 19.
    Zhang H, Wang S, Hao J, Wang X, Wang S, Chai F, et al. Air pollution and control action in Beijing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;112:1519-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.092.
  • 20.
    O'Neill SM, Xian P, Flemming J, Cope M, Baklanov A, Larkin NK, et al. Profiles of operational and research forecasting of smoke and air quality around the world. In: Loboda TV, French NHF, Puett RC, editors. Landscape fire, smoke, and health. 2023:149-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119757030.ch9.
  • 21.
    Shihab A. Assessment of Air Quality through Multiple Air Quality Index Models-A Comparative Study. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2023;24(4):110-116. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/159398.
  • 22.
    Nhung NTT, Schindler C, Dien TM, Probst-Hensch N, Perez L, Künzli N. Acute effects of ambient air pollution on lower respiratory infections in Hanoi children: an eight-year time series study. Environment international. 2018;110:139-48. [PubMed ID: 29128032]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.024.
  • 23.
    Li YR, Xiao CC, Li J, Tang J, Geng XY, Cui LJ, et al. Association between air pollution and upper respiratory tract infection in hospital outpatients aged 0 - 14 years in Hefei, China: a time series study. Public health. 2018;156:92-100. [PubMed ID: 29408194]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2017.12.006.
  • 24.
    Su W, Wu X, Geng X, Zhao X, Liu Q, Liu T. The short-term effects of air pollutants on influenza-like illness in Jinan, China. BMC public health. 2019;19(1). 1319. [PubMed ID: 31638933]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6805627]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7607-2.
  • 25.
    Dodge R, Solomon P, Moyers J, Hayes C. A longitudinal study of children exposed to sulfur oxides. American journal of epidemiology. 1985;121(5):720-36. [PubMed ID: 4014164]. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/121.5.720.
  • 26.
    Newman L. Atmospheric oxidation of sulfur dioxide: A review as viewed from power plant and smelter plume studies. Atmospheric Environment (1967). 1981;15(10):2231-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(81)90255-9.
  • 27.
    Fiedler V, Arnold F, Schlager H, Dörnbrack A, Pirjola L, Stohl A. East Asian SO2 pollution plume over Europe – Part 2: Evolution and potential impact. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2009;9(14):4729-45. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4729-2009.
  • 28.
    Khajeamiri Y, Sharifi S, Moradpour N, Khajeamiri A. A review on the effect of air pollution and exposure to PM, NO2, O3, SO2, CO and heavy metals on viral respiratory infections. Journal of air pollution and health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18502/japh.v5i4.6445.
  • 29.
    Khalaf EM, Mohammadi MJ, Sulistiyani S, Ramírez-Coronel AA, Kiani F, Jalil AT, et al. Effects of sulfur dioxide inhalation on human health: a review. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2024;39(2):331-7. [PubMed ID: 36635910]. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0237.
  • 30.
    Feng Y, Ning M, Lei Y, Sun Y, Liu W, Wang J. Defending blue sky in China: Effectiveness of the "Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan" on air quality improvements from 2013 to 2017. Journal of environmental management. 2019;252. 109603. [PubMed ID: 31586746]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109603.
  • 31.
    Liang L, Cai Y, Barratt B, Lyu B, Chan Q, Hansell AL, et al. Associations between daily air quality and hospitalisations for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Beijing, 2013 - 17: an ecological analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2019;3(6):e270-e9. [PubMed ID: 31229002]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6610933]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30085-3.
  • 32.
    Bashir MF, Ma BJ, Bilal, Komal B, Bashir MA, Farooq TH, et al. Correlation between environmental pollution indicators and COVID-19 pandemic: a brief study in Californian context. Environmental research. 2020;187. 109652. [PubMed ID: 32405084]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7219392]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109652.
  • 33.
    Zoran MA, Savastru RS, Savastru DM, Tautan MN. Assessing the relationship between ground levels of ozone (O3) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) with coronavirus (COVID-19) in Milan, Italy. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;740. 140005. [PubMed ID: 32559534]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7274116]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140005.
  • 34.
    Frampton MW, Smeglin AM, Roberts NJ, Finkelstein JN, Morrow PE, Utell MJ. Nitrogen dioxide exposure in vivo and human alveolar macrophage inactivation of influenza virus in vitro. Environmental research. 1989;48(2):179-92. [PubMed ID: 2784382]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(89)80033-7.
  • 35.
    Kowalska M, Skrzypek M, Kowalski M, Cyrys J. Effect of NOx and NO2 concentration increase in ambient air to daily bronchitis and asthma exacerbation, Silesian Voivodeship in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3):754. [PubMed ID: 31991627]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7037218]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030754.
  • 36.
    Schikowski T, Adam M, Marcon A, Cai Y, Vierkötter A, Carsin AE, et al. Association of ambient air pollution with the prevalence and incidence of COPD. European Respiratory Journal. 2014;44(3):614-26. [PubMed ID: 24488569]. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00132213.
  • 37.
    Mohammadi L, Rahdar A, Bazrafshan E, Dahmardeh H, Thysiadou A, Kyzas GZ. Benzene Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Heterogeneous Catalytic Ozonation Process with Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles. Ozone: Science & Engineering. 2020;43(2):147-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2020.1765738.
  • 38.
    Kamal A, Malik RN, Martellini T, Cincinelli A. Cancer risk evaluation of brick kiln workers exposed to dust bound PAHs in Punjab province (Pakistan). Science of The Total Environment. 2014;493:562-70. [PubMed ID: 24973936]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.140.
  • 39.
    Sanhueza PA, Reed GD, Davis WT, Miller TL. An Environmental Decision-Making Tool for Evaluating Ground-Level Ozone-Related Health Effects. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2003;53(12):1448-59. [PubMed ID: 14700132]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466324.
  • 40.
    Cazorla M, Brune WH. Measurement of Ozone Production Sensor. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2010;3(3):545-55. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-545-2010.
  • 41.
    Wong CM, Yang L, Thach TQ, Chau PYK, Chan KP, Thomas GN, et al. Modification by influenza on health effects of air pollution in Hong Kong. Environmental health perspectives. 2009;117(2):248-53. [PubMed ID: 19270795]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2649227]. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11605.
  • 42.
    Zhu Y, Xie J, Huang F, Cao L. Association between short-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 infection: Evidence from China. Science of the total environment. 2020;727. 138704. [PubMed ID: 32315904]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7159846]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138704.
  • 43.
    Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. The lancet. 2017;389(10082):1907-18. [PubMed ID: 28408086]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5439030]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6.
  • 44.
    Lim CC, Hayes RB, Ahn J, Shao Y, Silverman DT, Jones RR, et al. Long-term exposure to ozone and cause-specific mortality risk in the United States. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2019;200(8):1022-31. [PubMed ID: 31051079]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6794108]. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201806-1161OC.
  • 45.
    Carlisle AJ, Sharp NCC. Exercise and outdoor ambient air pollution. British journal of sports medicine. 2001;35(4):214-22. [PubMed ID: 11477012]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1724353]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.35.4.214.
  • 46.
    Qin F, Yang Y, Wang ST, Dong YN, Xu MX, Wang ZW, et al. Exercise and air pollutants exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Life sciences. 2019;218:153-64. [PubMed ID: 30582950]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.12.036.
  • 47.
    Saibene F, Mognoni P, Lafortuna CL, Mostardi R. Oronasal breathing during exercise. Pflügers Archiv. 1978;378(1):65-9. [PubMed ID: 569826]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00581959.
  • 48.
    Ferris BG, Mead J, Opie LH. Partitioning of respiratory flow resistance in man. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1964;19(4):653-8. [PubMed ID: 14195575]. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1964.19.4.653.
  • 49.
    Turcotte RA, Perrault H, Marcotte JE, Beland M. A test for the measurement of pulmonary diffusion capacity during high‐intensity exercise. Journal of sports sciences. 1992;10(3):229-35. [PubMed ID: 1602526]. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419208729921.
  • 50.
    Turcotte R, Kiteala L, Marcotte JE, Perrault H. Exercise-induced oxyhemoglobin desaturation and pulmonary diffusing capacity during high-intensity exercise. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology. 1997;75(5):425-30. [PubMed ID: 9189730]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004210050183.
  • 51.
    Babcock J, Lyndon R. A combined pollution index for measurement of total air pollution. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association. 1970;20(10):653-9. [PubMed ID: 5506686]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1970.10469453.
  • 52.
    Thach TQ, Tsang H, Cao P, Ho LM. A novel method to construct an air quality index based on air pollution profiles. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2018;221(1):17-26. [PubMed ID: 28988894]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.012.
  • 53.
    Ciencewicki J, Jaspers I. Air pollution and respiratory viral infection. Inhalation toxicology. 2007;19(14):1135-46. [PubMed ID: 17987465]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08958370701665434.
  • 54.
    Peng L, Xiao S, Gao W, Zhou Y, Zhou J, Yang D, et al. Short-term associations between size-fractionated particulate air pollution and COPD mortality in Shanghai, China. Environmental Pollution. 2020;257. 113483. [PubMed ID: 31677877]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113483.
  • 55.
    Martelletti L, Martelletti P. Air pollution and the novel Covid-19 disease: a putative disease risk factor. SN comprehensive clinical medicine. 2020;2(4):383-7. [PubMed ID: 32296757]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7156797]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00274-4.

Copyright

Copyright © 2026, Mohamadi et al. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

26
Oct
2022
Association Between Air Pollution, Climate Change, and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Recent Scientific Evidence

Association Between Air Pollution, Climate Change, and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Recent Scientific Evidence

Safiye Ghobakhloo,
Mohammad Bagher Miranzadeh,
Yasaman Ghaffari,
Zahra Ghobakhloo,
Gholam Reza Mostafaii

Ghobakhloo S, Miranzadeh MB, Ghaffari Y, Ghobakhloo Z, Mostafaii GR. Association Between Air Pollution, Climate Change, and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of the Recent Scientific Evidence. Health Scope. 2022;11(4):e122412. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope-122412

12
Dec
2023
Effect of COVID-19 and Air Pollution on the Risk Factors Attributed to COPD, Cardiovascular, and Respiratory Diseases

Effect of COVID-19 and Air Pollution on the Risk Factors Attributed to COPD, Cardiovascular, and Respiratory Diseases

Yousef Nikmanesh,
Kourosh Zarea,
Naser Hatamzadeh,
Marya Cheraghi,
Masoume Taherian,
Saeid Jalali
,et al.

Nikmanesh Y, Zarea K, Hatamzadeh N, Cheraghi M, Taherian M, et al. Effect of COVID-19 and Air Pollution on the Risk Factors Attributed to COPD, Cardiovascular, and Respiratory Diseases. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. 2024;13(1):e139881. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-139881

31
Mar
2024
A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study on the COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Hospitals in Qazvin, Iran

A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study on the COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Hospitals in Qazvin, Iran

Ameneh Barikani,
Monir Sadat Mirzadeh,
Ali Emami,
Navid Mohammadi,
Amir Javadi

Barikani A, Sadat Mirzadeh M, Emami A, Mohammadi N, Javadi A. A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study on the COVID-19 Patients Admitted to Hospitals in Qazvin, Iran. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;28(1):e153346. doi: https://doi.org/10.69107/jid-153346

4
Jul
2023
Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients and Potential Risk Factors for Mortality in Zahedan, Iran: A Multicenter Study

Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients and Potential Risk Factors for Mortality in Zahedan, Iran: A Multicenter Study

Hassan Okati-Aliabad,
Gholamreza Masoudy,
Hamidreza Kouhpayeh,
Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam,
Mahdi Mohammadi,
Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei
,et al.

Okati-Aliabad H, Masoudy G, Kouhpayeh H, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Mohammadi M, et al. Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Inpatients and Potential Risk Factors for Mortality in Zahedan, Iran: A Multicenter Study. Health Scope. 2023;12(3):e128078. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope-128078

16
Jan
2023
Spatio-temporal Analysis of COVID-19: A Global Study

Spatio-temporal Analysis of COVID-19: A Global Study

Sajjad Rahimi Pordanjani,
Maryam Mohammadian,
Somayeh Derakhshan,
Fatemeh Hadavandsiri,
Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari,
Mohammad Hossein Panahi

Rahimi Pordanjani S, Mohammadian M, Derakhshan S, Hadavandsiri F, Hashemi Nazari SS, et al. Spatio-temporal Analysis of COVID-19: A Global Study. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2023;10(2):e131344. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-131344

More by these authors

Leili MohamadiPubMedScholar
Hamid DahmardehPubMedScholar
Zahra DahmardehPubMedScholar
Reza Abbasi RayeniPubMedScholar
Bita MoudiPubMedScholar
Seyed Mohammad MousaviPubMedScholar
Mahdi KoolajiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics