1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Population Enrollment and Sample Collection
3.2. DNA Extraction, 16S rRNA Gene Amplification and Sequencing
3.3. Bioinformatics Analysis and Statistical Analysis
3.4. Determination of the Fecal Lactic Acid and SCFAs
3.5. Ethical Considerations
3.6. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Sequencing Metrics and Taxonomy
4.2. Microbial Richness and Biodiversity
| Group | Good’s Coverage, % | Richness Estimator | Diversity Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chao 1 | ACE | Simpson | Shannon | ||
| C | 99.58 | 569 | 582 | 0.894 | 4.712 |
| H | 99.73 | 334 | 343 | 0.686 | 3.264 |
a.The richness estimators (ACE and Chao1), diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson), and coverage were calculated using the QIIME software.
4.3. Abundance of Fecal Bacterial Composition
| Genus | Group C | Group H |
|---|---|---|
| Escherichia-Shigella | 2.86 | 28.78 |
| Bifidobacterium | 8.27 | 10.47 |
| Bacteroides | 15.84 | 8.27 |
| Klebsiella | 2.60 | 5.40 |
| Lachnoclostridium | 5.42 | 4.03 |
| Faecalibacterium | 11.15 | 2.78 |
| Ruminococcus_2 | 5.59 | 3.16 |
| Subdoligranulum | 12.39 | 2.71 |
| Coprostanoligenes_group | 3.46 | 2.12 |
| Pseudobutyrivibrio | 3.76 | - |
| Ruminococcus_1 | 2.36 | - |
| Enterobacter | - | 2.76 |
| Streptococcus | - | 3.32 |
Abbreviation: CMPA, Cow milk protein allergy.
aValues are presented as (%).
4.4. Comparison of Relative Abundance Through LDA Score and Cladogram Analysis
Linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe) identifies the most differentially abundant taxons between group C and group H (The enriched taxa in group C are indicated with a negative LDA score (red), and the enriched taxa in group H are indicated with a positive linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (green). Only taxa meeting an LDA significant threshold of > 2 are shown).







