Drug release from three different formulations
Table 1 shows the Encapsulation Efficiency (EE%), Drug Content (DC%), and swelling index for the best polymer/CH formulations. The systems containing gelatin/CH ratio of 1:1,
aloe vera/CH, and
gum tragacanth/CH ratio of 1:2 were found to be the most appropriate according to the encapsulation efficiency and drug content. As presented in
Table 1, the encapsulation efficiency of the polymer/CH formulations varied from 76 to 92%. In this case the Gelatin formulation shows better results in term of balance between EE% and DC%.
In the case of release kinetic, the aloe vera formulation because of its very hydrophilic and loose network structure, facilitates leach out of CH and has the fastest drug release than the other two polymeric systems. Determination of the swelling index for different formulations was performed to explain the observed results of the CH release with regard to the rates of polymers hydration.
Tables 2 and
3 represent the means and standard deviations for the calcium ion release (mg/dL) and changes in pH of the formulations in the different studied time periods, respectively. The comparison of mean calcium ion release (mg/dL) with different formulations was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and LSD test, which is shown in
Figure 1A.
Figure 1B shows the cumulative release rate of CH in the 4 groups.
The results obtained by ANOVA for both calcium ion release and changes in pH showed significant interactions between formulations and experimental time periods. The hydrophilic nature of polymers in the polymer/CH formulations can significantly facilitate water uptake and swelling of the polymeric matrix. So, faster leakage of the calcium out of the polymeric matrix occurred, resulting in higher release rate along the first few days and reaching a plateau after a certain period of time as evident from
Figure 1A.
The Gelatin/CH formulation showed a calcium release profile lower than that of the other three formulations during 30 days; also statistically significant differences between the Gelatin/CH formulation and control were found (P < 0.05).
As shown in
Figure 1B, Gelatin exhibited 60% calcium ion release at the end of 30 days. For
aloe vera/CH formulation, the same amount of calcium ion was released within 15 days and at the end of the time period, it reaches 98%. Pure CH showed fast diffusion behavior than Gelatin/CH and more than 77% of the CH was released within 30 days. A 88% of CH was released within 30 days for
gum tragacanth/CH formulation.
Among three naturally polymers, Gelatin exhibits more sustained and prolonged release of CH during the time period. For the preparation of the Gelatin/CH formulation, the applied solvent is water while the used solvent of both other polymer/CH formulations is glycerin. CH dissolves slightly in water but more readily in glycerin. This passive process of diffusion is highly dependent upon the concentration of the substance. The higher concentration leads to the faster the rate of diffusion. If the material dissolved in the carrier, its distribution becomes homogeneous and resulted into an increase in the amount of material per unit volume. In the case of material which precipitated in the carrier, diffusion becomes difficult. Glycerin can dissolved more CH than water but cannot hydrolyze it to its active parts (
22).
With decreasing swelling index, the cumulative CH release decreases. Because the least swelling index amount belongs to gelatin/CH, this formulation showed the more sustained-release system. Possibly the cationic calcium ion could entrap in the negative-charged Gelatin due to their attractive electrostatic interaction. From
Figure 1 and
Table 2, it can be concluded that faster CH release was observed for the case of a formulation having
aloe vera gel powder when compared with the other three groups. Hence, when
aloe vera is used alone as retarding material, it was unable to sustain the CH release.
Gum tragacanth could provide a sustained release of the CH up to 15 days approximately. This may due to better hygroscopic compatibility of the CH and polymeric matrix and possibly due to their attractive electrostatic force. Due to the gum tragacanth biodegradability, structural and compositional advantages, natural availability, higher resistance to microbial attacks, and low cost, it can be employed as a proper endodontic drug delivery system.
pH changes during evaluation of three different formulations
The statistically significant difference in pH was found among the different time intervals and also among the different formulations tested. In terms of pH, LSD test revealed that the pure CH system was significantly different from the other formulations in the last three time periods. For 15, 21 and 30 days of the experimental time periods, the highest pH values corresponded to the pure CH, followed by the formulations prepared with gelatin,
aloe vera and
gum tragacanth.
Figure 2 shows the average pH values of each formulation which were recorded at various time periods. The pH of the three groups (
aloe vera/CH,
gum tragacanth/CH, and pure CH) on the first day was found to be approximately 7.0.
Pacios
et al. have reported that the type of substance added to the CH paste might affect the pH values (
7). These reported results are in good agreement with our study. The pure CH showed significantly higher pH values than the other formulations. It should be mentioned that most studies reported pH values between 11 and 12, higher than the findings observed in the present study (
23,
24). The reason for this may be that in previous studies, the pH was measured either directly in the CH powder-vehicle mixture or in distilled water after direct putting up the formulation in it. In the present work, the formulations were applied to fill root canals which their coronal access was sealed before immersion in distilled water. During the time period, no increase in the pH of the surrounding media and a non-significant reduction was observed. The buffering capacity of polymers is main key factors affecting the diffusion of hydroxyl ion through root dentin and could explain these findings (
7). Most of these formulations show slightly acidic or neutral pH with a mild buffering property that can redox the OH ions to H
2O
2. However, the pure CH, obtained by mixing CH powder with the distilled water, has a high pH and promotes a rapid ionic release (
25). The 30-day release data were fitted to Zero order, First-order and Higuchi equations and the correlation coefficient values (r) are presented in
Table 4. The release kinetics did not fit to the Zero order and first order equations, whereas better results are obtained for Higuchi-square root equation, suggesting that diffusion-controlled transport of CH through the polymer/CH formulations.
FTIR analysis of three different formulations
Figure 3 shows FTIR spectra of three different formulations containing polymers and CH and the spectra of polymers without CH are also presented. These spectra were taken in the wavelength ranging between 500 and 4,000 cm-1.
As shown in the figure, there are no significant differences between the spectra of free and or formulated polymers, and it can be concluded that the formation of new bonds between CH and polymers were not occurred. This finding is important from the two points of view; the release kinetic of CH could not be affected by polymer bonding and is only diffusion controlled, the new polymeric-CH compounds are not formed to cause probable cell cytotoxicity.
Antibacterial evaluation
The use of biocompatible intracanal medicaments with antimicrobial properties between appointments may lessen or eradicate bacteria in the root canal and hence increase the success of root canal treatment (
26). All substances (including gelatin,
aloe vera,
gum tragacanth, three polymer/CH formulations, glycerin, and CH) were screened for their antibacterial efficacy by agar disc diffusion method. The antibacterial activities of different substances were evaluated by the diameter of the inhibition zone around the disk; these measured diameters are reported in
Table 5.
The type of vehicle used may have an important influence on the antimicrobial activity of CH (
27). The diameter of the inhibition zones around the disk created by each substance is presented in
Table 5. The following scale of measurement: zone of inhibition of >15 mm as strongly inhibitory, 10-15 mm as moderately inhibitory, and <10 mm as not inhibitory was considered for the interpretation of the antibacterial tests. However, CH has excellent antimicrobial properties, for its tested concentrations in the present study; CH was not able to eliminate
E. faecalis sufficiently. This is consistent with the results of the other reports (
28,
29). Results in
Table 5 showed that the antimicrobial activity of Gelatin against
E. faecalis was increased when manipulated with CH and indicating a moderately antimicrobial activity against this microorganism. However, for other substances, a prominent antimicrobial efficacy can’t be seen at any of the studied concentrations. For example, the inhibition zones of
gum tragacanth and
gum tragacanth/CH were similar against
E. faecalis. It is clear that many of the tested materials were found not active against the bacteria as
aloe vera or
aloe vera/CH. In a study by Wynn,
aloe vera gel showed inhibitory effects on
E. faecalis because of its anthraquinine components (
30) and its bactericidal activity is found to be less than that of CH (
31).
(A) The calcium ion release profile in the 4 groups. (B) The cumulative release of calcium ion for the 4 groups
The pH profiles of the 4 groups
FTIR spectra of (A) Gelatin and gelatin/CH, (B) Gum tragacanth and gum tragacanth/CH, (C) Aloe vera and aloe vera/CH
| Type of formulation | Encapsulation efficiency (%) | Drug content (%) | Swelling index |
|---|
| Gelatin/CH | 92 ± 1.27 | 48 ± 2.53 | 1.24 ± 0.21 |
| Gum tragacanth/CH | 88 ± 1.83 | 63 ± 3.12 | 1.41 ± 0.19 |
| Aloe vera/CH | 76 ± 3.22 | 60 ± 1.56 | 3.59 ± 0.35 |
| Period (day) | Gelatin/CH | Gum tragacanth/CH | Aloe vera/CH | Pure CH |
|---|
| 1 | 0.445 ± 0.118 | 0.717 ± 0.118 | 0.647 ± 0.118 | 0.813 ± 0.145 |
| 7 | 5.004 ± 0.393 | 5.651 ± 0.393 | 6.231 ± 0.393 | 5.974 ± 0.482 |
| 15 | 2.114 ± 0.230 | 3.232 ± 0.230 | 3.046 ± 0.230 | 2.448 ± 0.282 |
| 21 | 1.521 ± 0.259 | 2.558 ± 0.259 | 3.121 ± 0.259 | 2.072 ± 0.318 |
| 30 | 0.838 ± 0.375 | 2.451 ± 0.375 | 3.291 ± 0.375 | 1.425 ± 0.459 |
| Period (day) | Gelatin/CH | Gum tragacanth/CH | Aloe vera/CH | Pure CH |
|---|
| 1 | 8.085 ± 0.247 | 8.167 ± 0.247 | 7.509 ± 0.247 | 7.729 ± 0.302 |
| 7 | 6.985 ± 0.040 | 6.627 ± 0.040 | 6.960 ± 0.040 | 6.731 ± 0.049 |
| 15 | 7.045 ± 0.122 | 6.524 ± 0.122 | 6.749 ± 0.122 | 7.279 ± 0.150 |
| 21 | 7.169 ± 0.072 | 6.453 ± 0.072 | 7.090 ± 0.072 | 8.123 ± 0.088 |
| 30 | 6.983 ± 0.091 | 6.278 ± 0.091 | 6.577 ± 0.091 | 8.310 ± 0.111 |
| Type of formulation | Zero order | First-order | Higuchi-square root |
| Gelatin/CH | K0 = 0.001r*= 0.58 | K1 = 0.0077r = 0.76 | KH = 0.0517r = 0.79 |
| Gum tragacanth/CH | K0 = 0.0014r = 0.8 | K1 = 0.0006r = 0.66 | KH = 0.0542r = 0.8 |
| Aloe vera/CH | K0 = 0.001r = 0.56 | K1 = 0.0025r = 0.87 | KH = 0.0552r = 0.8 |
| Pure CH | K0 = 0.002r = 0.89 | K1 = 0.0004r = 0.4 | KH = 0.0522r = 0.79 |
| Type of material | C+ (µg/µL) | ZOI* (mm) | Type of material | C (µg/µL) | ZOI (mm) |
|---|
| Gelatin | 0.08 | 7.5 | Gum tragacanth | 0.08 | 7.5 |
| 0.16 | 9 | 0.16 | 8.4 |
| 0.32 | 11.5 | 0.32 | 9.2 |
| 0.64 | 12.5 | 0.64 | 10 |
| Gelatin/CH | 0.08 | 9 | Gum tragacanth/CH | 0.08 | 7 |
| 0.16 | 10 | 0.16 | 7.5 |
| 0.32 | 12 | 0.32 | 8.5 |
| 0.64 | 14 | 0.64 | 9.5 |
| Aloe vera | 0.08 | 8 | CH | 0.08 | 7 |
| 0.16 | 8.6 | 0.16 | 7.25 |
| 0.32 | 9 | 0.32 | 8 |
| 0.64 | 9.4 | 0.64 | 9 |
| Aloe vera/CH | 0.08 | 8 | Glycerin | 0.08 | 8 |
| 0.16 | 8.8 | 0.16 | 9 |
| 0.32 | 9 | 0.32 | 9.3 |
| 0.64 | 9.3 | 0.64 | 9.8 |
| Ceftazidime | 30 µg | 22 | | | |