Acute test
To determine the toxic potential of the test article by oral ingestion, acute test was considered according to the OECD 425 guideline. This study permitted an estimation of the LD50 of the test article and the results were allowed for ranking and classification of the test article according to the globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS), and OPPTS toxicity categories guidelines.
1. Limit Test
The chemical composition indicated that the test article was likely to be non-toxic; therefore, a decision was made to proceed with the Limit test. First animals (1 mice and 1 rat in both genders) were dosed at 5000 mg/kg. Since these animals survived, four additional animals in each strain and gender were sequentially dosed at approximately 48 to 72 h intervals. A total of 20 animals were tested.
2. Test Article Preparation
Since the test article was a granule, they were used on “1 g/mL” suspension. The vehicle for preparing this suspension was distilled water.
3. Dose Administration
The animals were dosed at 2000 mg/kg (0.2 mL/kg by volume). The individual doses of the test article were individually calculated for each animal based on the body weight of the animals. All doses were administered orally using a feeding cannula, inserted into the stomach of the animals.
4. Observations during In-Life Phase
The animals were individually observed once during the first 30 min after dosing and periodically during the first 48 h following dosing (with special attention given during the first 4 h). Observations once daily were carried out for the rest of study. The animals were observed for 14 days after the dosing. Cageside observations were directed towards any changes in the skin and fur, eyes and mucous membranes, and also respiratory, circulatory, autonomic and central nervous system, and somatomotor activity and behavior pattern. Particular attention was directed to any observation of tremors, convulsions, salivation, diarrhea, lethargy, sleep and/or coma. Any symptoms of toxicity and deaths were recorded daily for the entire study period and the entries were monitored. The body weights of the animals were determined prior to test article administration (i.e. day 0), on day 7, day 13 and again on day 14.
Post Mortem Examination
Gross necropsy was performed on each mouse at the end of the 14 day observation period and necropsy included an examination of: external surfaces of the body; all orifices; cranial cavity; external surfaces of the brain and spinal cord; nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses; thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic cavities and viscera.
Subchronic toxicity study
Three test groups and a control group were used, but from our first assessment acute oral toxicity study, no effects were observed at a dose of 2 mL/100 g and the test substance was categorized as practically non-toxic agent or category 5 in GHS classification. Except for treatment with the test substance, animals in the control group were handled in an identical manner to the test group subjects. As the vehicle used in administering the test substance was water, the control group received the same volume of water. Dose levels were selected according to the existing toxicity data available for the test compound or related materials from our first studies.
The highest dose level was chosen with the aim of inducing toxic effects but not death or severe suffering. Thereafter, a descending sequence of dose levels was selected with a view to demonstrating any dosage related response and no-observed-adverse effects at the lowest dose level (NOAEL). Two to four fold intervals are frequently optimal for setting the descending dose levels and addition of a fourth test group is often preferable to using very large intervals (e.g. more than a factor of 10) between dosages. On the basis of this concept dose levels were determined as Low dose group (250 mg/kg), medium dose group (500 mg/kg) and high dose group (1000 mg/kg) from terepene extract on the basis of their body weights once daily for 6 days per week during a period of 28 days. Distilled water was administered to negative control group of animals. In the presence of observed general toxicity (e.g. reduced body weight, liver, heart, lung or kidney effects, etc.) or other changes that may not be toxic responses (e.g. reduced food intake, liver enlargement), observed effects on immune, neurological or endocrine sensitive endpoints was interpreted with caution in this study .
The observation period was 28 days. Animals in a satellite group scheduled for follow-up observations which were kept for at least 14 days without treatment to detect delayed occurrence, or persistence of, or recovery from toxic effects.
Clinical examinations
Clinical signs were observed and weights were measured and recorded once daily in acute study and once weekly in subchronic study. The recording items were divided to three categories:
Cageside Observations contained home cage activity, feces color, feces amount, feces consistency, urine color, urine amount and behavior while removing from cage.
Neurological Examination analyzed tail elevation, abnormal gait, ataxic gait, and head position.
Physical Examination included death, hair coat, mucus membrane/eye/skin color, body temperature, respiratory rate, respiratory character, lacrimation, amount of salivation, and eye prominence.
Biochemical assays
Biochemical parameters were measured in three female and three male mice of high dose group and control group with an automated biochemical analyzer in the same laboratory and consisted of fasting blood glucose (FBS), low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), fasting triglycerides (TG), aspartate aminotransferase (AST or SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT or SGPT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP in day 28 or last day of study).
Histopathological studies
Various organs from respiratory system (lung), cardiovascular system (heart), lymphatic system (spleen), urinary system (kidneys), digestive tract (liver) were removed from 3 female and 3 male mice of high dose group and control group whose serums were assayed for biochemical studies. Organ weights were recorded and absolute and relative organ weights were compared in each group with related control. The tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and dehydrated in graded series of alcohol, cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin wax. Multiple sections from each block were prepared at 5 µm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E).
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as mean ± SD. Firstly, evaluation of homogeneity of variances was done to compare groups.
If variances were not significantly different, the data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Student’s t-test. When variances were assumed significantly different, Man-Whitney U test for comparison of two variables and Kruskall-Wallis H test for comparison of more than two variables were exerted. A significant difference was accepted with P < 0.05. SPSS 21 was the software; all statistical methods were performed with.