Background:
Ultrasound therapy can be utilized to manage chronic wounds including venous leg ulcers (VLUs).
IJ Radiology
Ultrasound therapy can be utilized to manage chronic wounds including venous leg ulcers (VLUs).
A randomized controlled clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of standard treatment and standard treatment plus either high frequency ultrasound (HFU) or noncontact low-frequency ultrasound (NCLFU) on VLU outcomes.
Ninety outpatients (47 men, 43 women; average age, 38.3 [SD, 11.5] years) were randomly assigned into either of the standard care (n = 30), HFU (n = 30) or NCLFU groups (n = 30). Standard care included multilayered compression bandaging (40 mm Hg of pressure at the ankle graduated to 17 mm Hg to 20 mm Hg below the knee) nonadherent dressing and regular debridement. Standard care dressing changes and ultrasound therapy were provided three times per week for 3 months or until healing. HFU delivers high intensity (0.5 1 W/cm2) high frequency (1 3 MHz) ultrasound for 5 to 10 minutes and NCLFU delivers low-intensity (0.1 0.8 W/cm2) low frequency (40 kHz) ultrasound for 4-10 minutes. Patients were followed until healing. Wound size wound pain and lower leg edema was assessed at baseline and after 2 and 4 months. Data were analyzed using Student's t test ANOVA, chi square or Fisher s exact test. P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Initial wound measurements were 9.60 cm2 (SD 5.54) 9.86 cm2 (SD 3.95) and 10.01 cm2 (SD 4.58) for the standard treatment HFU and NCLFU groups respectively. After 4 months measurements were reduced to 4.28 cm2 (SD 2.80) 3.23 cm2 (SD 2.39) and 2.72 cm2 (SD 2.16) for the standard treatment HFU and NCLFU groups respectively which was statistically significant (P = 0.04). All wounds were healed after an average of 8.50 (SD 2.17) 6.86 (SD 2.04) and 6.65 (SD 1.59) months in the standard treatment, HFU and NCLFU groups respectively (P = 0.001). Differences in the amount of edema and pain rating scores were also significant at the 4th month follow up visit (P = 0.05).
Outcomes of both methods of ultrasound therapy were better than standard care alone, and some differences between the two ultrasound therapy groups were observed, but they were not statistically significant.
© 2014, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Zafarghandi MR, Farsavian H, Davoudi M, Farsavian AA. Outcome of Ultrasonography-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy Versus Stab Avulsion Ambulatory Phlebectomy in the Treatment of Varicosis in Small Veins of the Leg: A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial. I J Radiol. 2017;14(3):e21742. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21742
Owliaee P, Saeedi S, Kouchaki M, Asadi MR. A Comparative Study of The Efficacy of Photobiomodulation and Electrical Stimulation on Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2025;12(3):e159265. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-159265
Salouti R, Ghanaati H, Firouznia K, Hedayati M, Noaparast M, et al. Endovenous Laser for the Treatment of Saphenous Reflux and Varicose Veins. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21431. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21431
Abasi Niasar A, Abdi F, Jandaghian-Bidgoli M, Akbarzadeh Amirdehi M, Bahrami T, et al. The Effect of Nurse-Led Intervention on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers with Ozonated Olive Oil: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Nurs Midwifery Sci. 2025;12(1):e157696. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-157696
Hemmati H, Toloie M, Esmaeili-Delshad M, Ashoorizadeh B, Rohani M. Complications of Sclerotherapy with Sclerosing Foam in Lower Extremity Varicose Veins. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2015;17(1):e1927. doi:
Checking
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
Last Update: 4 days ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC