Among the 149 participants in our investigation, the prevalence of survival to hospital discharge was 24 percent. This prevalence is significantly low in comparison to other studies performed in Asia (36%) and low and middle-income countries (34%) (
9). In our study, the age and gender of resuscitated patients had no significant association with resuscitation outcomes, while some other studies have associated better outcomes with younger age. In another study, age also had no effect on resuscitation outcomes (
10,
11).
The occurrence of IHCA was associated with better outcomes in terms of successful resuscitation and survival to discharge, with 73.7% of IHCA patients achieving ROSC and 30% surviving to discharge. Similarly, in the study by Yurtseven et al. in 2019, IHCA patients had better outcomes; 80% of IHCA patients achieved ROSC, and 40% survived to discharge (
11). The differences in resuscitation outcomes between the IHCA and OHCA groups can be attributed to immediate post-arrest care, including the presence of experienced medical staff at the bedside, availability of necessary equipment, and the early initiation of ALS in IHCA patients.
In previous studies, respiratory failure has been identified as the most common cause of resuscitation in children, and it has also been observed that respiratory arrest as a cause of resuscitation is associated with better outcomes in terms of successful resuscitation and survival to discharge. Possible reasons for this difference include maintained blood flow: In respiratory arrest, the heart often continues to beat, allowing blood flow to vital organs. In contrast, cardiac arrest abruptly stops circulation, leading to cerebral ischemia and organ damage.
Time to Intervention: Respiratory arrest is usually identified more rapidly, allowing for prompt assisted ventilation. However, in cardiac arrest, the time required to recognize the event and initiate resuscitation may be longer. Response to Resuscitation: Respiratory arrest typically responds better to assisted ventilation, whereas cardiac arrest requires a combination of CPR, vasopressor administration, and potentially defibrillation (
11-
13). In our study, respiratory failure was also the most common cause of resuscitation, accounting for 73.8%, and was associated with better resuscitation outcomes.
In our study, the most common initial rhythm during resuscitation was asystole, accounting for 34.2%, followed by normal sinus rhythm at 28.2%, and sinus bradycardia at 16.1%. The worst outcomes were associated with asystole, while the best outcomes were associated with sinus rhythms. In the study by Reis et al., the most common rhythm was asystole at 55%, which was associated with a lower survival rate to discharge, followed by sinus bradycardia at 33%, which was associated with better survival outcomes (
12). In the study by Rathore et al., the most common rhythm was sinus bradycardia at 52.2%, followed by PEA at 24%, and asystole at 15.2%, with asystole being associated with reduced survival to discharge (
13).
Although our study did not identify a statistically significant difference in survival rates across different shifts, existing literature suggests that shift timing can influence patient outcomes due to factors such as staff fatigue, reduced staffing levels, and diminished alertness during off-hours. Specifically, a meta-analysis by Lin et al. demonstrated that OHCAs occurring at night are associated with lower survival rates compared to daytime incidents, potentially due to decreased staffing and delayed response times during night shifts (
14). Similarly, Ofoma et al. found that IHCAs during off-hours (nights and weekends) had poorer outcomes, attributing this to factors like reduced nurse-to-patient ratios and less experienced staff (
15). Furthermore, a study focusing on ICU physicians found that night shifts led to higher levels of fatigue and reduced psychomotor vigilance, which could potentially impact patient care quality.
5.1. Conclusions
In this study, we did not collect data regarding the long-term follow-up of patients who survived. It is clear that one of the most important factors in resuscitation is the potential complications (cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory, etc.) after successful resuscitation. Another limitation is the retrospective design, which restricts causal inference and is dependent on the accuracy of documentation. In this study, we faced limitations and challenges that were explained in the relevant section. Conducting multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and more complete data can enhance our understanding of the factors influencing the resuscitation process in children and their impact on the final outcomes. The prevalence of survival to hospital discharge was significantly low in comparison to other studies. The survival measures were associated with the location of cardiorespiratory arrest, cause of resuscitation, shorter duration of resuscitation, and rhythm prior to chest compressions.
5.2. Limitations
The most important limitation of our study was the incompleteness of the files. The information recorded in the files was sometimes poorly written and illegible. The files of some patients were incompletely scanned, meaning that the history and orders pages were not fully scanned. The files of a small number of patients were not available at all, and we had to exclude these patients from the study. Despite the lack of significant differences in resuscitation outcomes across different work shifts, due to the higher mortality rates in evening and night shifts, these shifts require more attention.
5.3. Recommendations
It is recommended to implement changes such as shortening the duration of the night shift or increasing the number of personnel in the shift to reduce mortality. These findings underscore the importance of early intervention and specific clinical factors in improving pediatric resuscitation outcomes.