Cover image of the article: Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes Due to Protamine Administration by Calcium Gluconate after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Image Credit:Int Cardiovasc Res J

Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes Due to Protamine Administration by Calcium Gluconate after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery

Authors

F Jahanmirinejad1, MT Moeinvaziri1, M Salari1, M Janati2,*, Javad Kojuri2, A Alipoor3
1Department of Anesthesiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Department of Epidemiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: M Janati, Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran Email: janatim@sums.ac.ir

International Cardiovascular Research Journal:Vol. 3, issue 2; e68468
Published online:Jun 30, 2009
Article type:Research Article
Received:Mar 11, 2018
Accepted:Jun 30, 2009
How to Cite:Jahanmirinejad F, Moeinvaziri M, Salari M, Janati M, Kojuri J, et al. Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes Due to Protamine Administration by Calcium Gluconate after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2009;3(2):e68468. doi:

Abstract

Background: Administration of Protamine sulfate for heparin neutralization after cardiopulmonary bypass may
be associated with adverse reactions such as transient hypotension to cardiovascular collapse. Although catastrophic
events are rare and occur only in 2.6% of cardiac surgeries, it is associated with adverse postoperative
outcome. The aim of this study is to investigate whether bolus administration of calcium gluconate can minimize
the adverse hemodynamic effects of protamine.
Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) prospective study was conducted between Feb.
2006 to Dec. 2008. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups including group A (42 patients) who
received only protamine after weaning from cardiopulmonary, group B (44 patients) concomitantly treated with
protamine sulfate and calcium gluconate, and group C (40 patients) receiving calcium gluconate 5 minutes before
administration of protamine. Hemodynamic variables such as systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean
of arterial pressure, central venous pressure and heart rate were obtained 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 minutes after
protamine administration from each group.
Results: Systolic blood pressure in groups A (control) and C (calcium administration before protamine) 0,2,4,6,8
and 10 minutes after protamine administration initially decreased and increased subsequently (P=0.228). Also no
statistically significant difference was found in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP),
central venous pressure (CVP), and heart rate (HR) in 0,2,4,6,8, and 10 minutes in any of the three groups.
Conclusion: In our study, hemodynamic changes in 10 minutes after protamine administration for heparin neutralization
in patients with good left ventricular systolic function after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
were mild, and prophylactic calcium gluconate administration concurrent with or before protamine injection
was not recommended.

Highlights

Fulltext

The full text is available in PDF.

References

  • 1.
    The references are available in PDF.

Copyright

© 2009, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

26
May
2018
Impact of Procaine Hydrochloride Versus Lidocaine in Cardioplegic Solution, on Reperfusion Arrhythmia During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Impact of Procaine Hydrochloride Versus Lidocaine in Cardioplegic Solution, on Reperfusion Arrhythmia During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Soheila Sadeghi,
Nicholas Austin,
Ziae Totonchi,
Hooman Bakhshandeh,
Naser Hadavand,
Alireza Alizadeh Ghavidel

Sadeghi S, Austin N, Totonchi Z, Bakhshandeh H, Hadavand N, et al. Impact of Procaine Hydrochloride Versus Lidocaine in Cardioplegic Solution, on Reperfusion Arrhythmia During Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2018;9(2):e67749. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mcardia.67749

11
Sep
2016
Does Clopidogrel Increase Blood Loss Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

Does Clopidogrel Increase Blood Loss Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

Mikaeal. Rezaei

Rezaei M. Does Clopidogrel Increase Blood Loss Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?. Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2011;3(2):e8744. doi:

21
Jun
2016
Acute Severe Thrombocytopenia Occurring After Administration of Eptifibatide Postpones Emergent Coronary Artery Surgery

Acute Severe Thrombocytopenia Occurring After Administration of Eptifibatide Postpones Emergent Coronary Artery Surgery

Brent T. Boettcher,
Timothy J. Olund,
Paul S. Pagel

Boettcher BT, Olund TJ, Pagel PS. Acute Severe Thrombocytopenia Occurring After Administration of Eptifibatide Postpones Emergent Coronary Artery Surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2016;6(4):e37575. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.37575

21
Jun
2014
The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine in Hemodynamic Responses to Endotracheal Intubation in Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine in Hemodynamic Responses to Endotracheal Intubation in Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Mehrdad Mesbah Kiaee,
Saeid Safari,
Gholam Reza Movaseghi,
Mahmoud Reza Mohaghegh Dolatabadi,
Masoud Ghorbanlo,
Mehrnoosh Etemadi
,et al.

Mesbah Kiaee M, Safari S, Movaseghi GR, Mohaghegh Dolatabadi MR, Ghorbanlo M, et al. The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate and Lidocaine in Hemodynamic Responses to Endotracheal Intubation in Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(3):e15905. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.15905

23
Aug
2022
Comparison of the Effect of Heparinized Normal Saline Solution Versus Saline Solutions in Arterial and Central Venous Catheters on Complete Blood Count After Cardiac Surgery

Comparison of the Effect of Heparinized Normal Saline Solution Versus Saline Solutions in Arterial and Central Venous Catheters on Complete Blood Count After Cardiac Surgery

Mohsen Ziyaeifard,
Rasool Ferasat-Kish,
Rasoul Azarfarin,
Nahid Aghdaii,
Hasan Nejatisini,
Changiz Azadi Ahmadabadi
,et al.

Ziyaeifard M, Ferasat-Kish R, Azarfarin R, Aghdaii N, Nejatisini H, et al. Comparison of the Effect of Heparinized Normal Saline Solution Versus Saline Solutions in Arterial and Central Venous Catheters on Complete Blood Count After Cardiac Surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2022;12(4):e113345. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-113345

More by these authors

F JahanmirinejadPubMedScholar
MT MoeinvaziriPubMedScholar
Javad KojuriPubMedScholar
A AlipoorPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics