Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia
Outlines
Intravenous Drug Sedation for MRI in Children; A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Introduction; Performing MRI in children is a matter of concern and needs adequate sedation because patients should be completely motionless to provide a good quality of imaging.? The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Nesdonal and Propofol + Lidocaine to provide sedation in children undergoing brain MRI.Methods; This was a randomized, blinded trial including 250 patients aged 3 months to 13 years who were candidate for elective brain MRI. Participants were divided into two groups. Group 1 received Nesdonal and group 2 received Propofol + Lidocaine. Demographic characteristics were recorded. Unconsciousness time, scan time and discharge time were compared between the two groups. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16 by Chi-square, ANOVA, Man-Whitney and T-test (p value < 0.05).Results; Totally 250 patients were assigned randomly to two groups of Propofol + Lidocaine and Nesdonal, each including 125 patients. There was no meaningful difference regarding demographic factors of age, gender or ASA class between the two groups. There was no meaningful statistically difference regarding unconsciousness time (P value=0.655), scan time (P value=0.324) and discharge time (P value=0.436) between the Propofol + Lidocaine and Nesdonal group. Some minor adverse effects occurred in the Propofol + Lidocaine group. No major complication occurred.Discussion; Nesdonal was superior to Propofol + Lidocaine regarding lower adverse effects, lower costs, no need for an infusion pump and not lowering seizure threshold.it can be considered safe for sedation in children undergoing brain MRI, especially those with a history of seizure.
References
- 1.References are in the PDF file of the article.
Copyright
© 2019, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
A Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Determine the Effect of Oral Zolpidem and Midazolam on the Level of Preoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Eye Examination Under General Anesthesia
Derakhshan P, Faiz SHR, Emami A, Mohseni M, Shirani M. A Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Determine the Effect of Oral Zolpidem and Midazolam on the Level of Preoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Eye Examination Under General Anesthesia. Inn J Pediatr. 2020;30(3):e102183. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.102183
Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children
Beirami F, Khoshfetrat M, Babaiyan S, Ansari-Moghadam A. Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2016;18(5):e6671. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-6671
The Effect of Preoperative Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine vs. Intravenous Ketamine on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Shafa A, Abediny R, Shetabi H, Shahhosseini S. The Effect of Preoperative Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine vs. Intravenous Ketamine on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(2):e130991. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-130991
Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial
Moftakhar F, Akhondzadeh R, Hosseininejad F, Alizade Ahvazi S. Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(6):e138929. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-138929
Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup
Salem K, Khoshrang H, Kousha M, Hoseini M, Ranjbar M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup. Inn J Pediatr. 2015;25(3):-. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.25(3)2015.494
Crossmark
Checking
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 6 days ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC
Author(s):