Intravenous Drug Sedation for MRI in Children; A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author(s):
Mehrdad Mesbah KiaeiMehrdad Mesbah Kiaei1,*, Arash JafariehArash Jafarieh2, Abolghasem YoosefiAbolghasem Yoosefi2
1Assistant Professor of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hasheminejad Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Amir Alam Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Assistant Professor of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hasheminejad Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Email: [email protected]

Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia:Vol. 4, issue 4; e149592
Published online:Mar 24, 2020
Article type:Original Articles
How to Cite:Mesbah Kiaei M, Jafarieh A, Yoosefi A. Intravenous Drug Sedation for MRI in Children; A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2019;4(4):e149592. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v4i4.28915

Abstract

Introduction; Performing MRI in children is a matter of concern and needs adequate sedation because patients should be completely motionless to provide a good quality of imaging.? The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Nesdonal and Propofol + Lidocaine to provide sedation in children undergoing brain MRI.Methods; This was a randomized, blinded trial including 250 patients aged 3 months to 13 years who were candidate for elective brain MRI. Participants were divided into two groups. Group 1 received Nesdonal and group 2 received Propofol + Lidocaine. Demographic characteristics were recorded. Unconsciousness time, scan time and discharge time were compared between the two groups. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 16 by Chi-square, ANOVA, Man-Whitney and T-test (p value < 0.05).Results; Totally 250 patients were assigned randomly to two groups of Propofol + Lidocaine and Nesdonal, each including 125 patients. There was no meaningful difference regarding demographic factors of age, gender or ASA class between the two groups. There was no meaningful statistically difference regarding unconsciousness time (P value=0.655), scan time (P value=0.324) and discharge time (P value=0.436) between the Propofol + Lidocaine and Nesdonal group. Some minor adverse effects occurred in the Propofol + Lidocaine group. No major complication occurred.Discussion; Nesdonal was superior to Propofol + Lidocaine regarding lower adverse effects, lower costs, no need for an infusion pump and not lowering seizure threshold.it can be considered safe for sedation in children undergoing brain MRI, especially those with a history of seizure.

References

  • 1.
    References are in the PDF file of the article.

Copyright

© 2019, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

4
May
2020
Iranian Journal of Pediatrics

A Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Determine the Effect of Oral Zolpidem and Midazolam on the Level of Preoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Eye Examination Under General Anesthesia

Pooya Derakhshan,
Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz,
Azadeh Emami,
Masood Mohseni,
Mohsen Shirani

Derakhshan P, Faiz SHR, Emami A, Mohseni M, Shirani M. A Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Determine the Effect of Oral Zolpidem and Midazolam on the Level of Preoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Eye Examination Under General Anesthesia. Inn J Pediatr. 2020;30(3):e102183. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.102183

15
May
2016

Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children

Faranak Beirami,
Masoum Khoshfetrat,
Saeede Babaiyan,
Alireza Ansari-Moghadam

Beirami F, Khoshfetrat M, Babaiyan S, Ansari-Moghadam A. Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2016;18(5):e6671. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-6671

10
Mar
2023
Anesth Pain Med

The Effect of Preoperative Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine vs. Intravenous Ketamine on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Amir Shafa,
Reza Abediny,
Hamidreza Shetabi,
Sedighe Shahhosseini

Shafa A, Abediny R, Shetabi H, Shahhosseini S. The Effect of Preoperative Combined with Intravenous Lidocaine and Ketamine vs. Intravenous Ketamine on Pediatric Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(2):e130991. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-130991

23
Dec
2023
Anesth Pain Med

Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial

Fatemeh Moftakhar,
Reza Akhondzadeh,
Fatemeh Hosseininejad,
Sarina Alizade Ahvazi

Moftakhar F, Akhondzadeh R, Hosseininejad F, Alizade Ahvazi S. Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Intravenous Lidocaine on Colonoscopy Candidates Under Sedation with Propofol-Fentanyl: A Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(6):e138929. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-138929

27
Jun
2015

Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup

Katayoun Salem,
Hossein Khoshrang,
Maryam Kousha,
Mahboobeh Hoseini,
Marzieh Ranjbar,
Shadi Baniasadi
,et al.

Salem K, Khoshrang H, Kousha M, Hoseini M, Ranjbar M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup. Inn J Pediatr. 2015;25(3):-. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.25(3)2015.494

Download PDF447.42 KB

Crossmark

Crossmark

Checking

Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles