Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia
Outlines
Comparison Between Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) offer an alternative airway with improved airway seal enable the use of higher airway pressures during positive pressure ventilation (PPV). We compared the safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Proseal and LMA Supreme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Materials and Methods: Eighty patients, 18-60 years, ASA grade 1 & 2 were randomly allocated into two groups of 40 each. After induction of anesthesia, LMA Supreme or LMA Proseal of appropriate size was then inserted randomly. Parameters like the ease of LMA insertion; ease of OGT insertion; oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP); hemodynamics; adequacy of ventilation were recorded. Complications, if any, were also recorded. Results: LMA Supreme was easier to insert than LMA Proseal. Gastric tube insertion was comparatively easier in LMA Supreme than LMA Proseal. The mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with LMA Proseal (31.98 ? 2.49cmH2O) than with LMA Supreme (30.23 ? 3.65 cmH2O). Peak airway pressures were comparable for the two groups. There was comparatively more airway trauma (mucosal injury, sore throat) in LMA Proseal than LMA Supreme. Conclusion: A higher oropharyngeal leak pressure makes LMA Proseal a better choice than LMA Supreme in procedures with raised intragastric pressure.
References
- 1.References are in the PDF file of the article.
Copyright
© 2022, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Comparison of Baska Mask Versus Endotracheal Tube for General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Mariyappan S, R A, S PK, P N, V A SA, et al. Comparison of Baska Mask Versus Endotracheal Tube for General Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2024;9(3):e145475. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jcma-145475
Success Rate of Airway Devices Insertion: Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Supraglottic Gel Device
Pournajafian A, Alimian M, Rokhtabnak F, Ghodraty M, Mojri M. Success Rate of Airway Devices Insertion: Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Supraglottic Gel Device. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(2):e22068. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.22068
Efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airway Compared to Endotracheal Tube: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Zaman B, Noorizad S, Safari S, Javadi Larijani SMH, Seyed Siamdoust SA. Efficacy of Laryngeal Mask Airway Compared to Endotracheal Tube: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2022;12(1):e120478. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.120478
Comparison of the Success Rate of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion in Classic & Rotatory Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia
Aghdashi MM, Valizade Hasanloei MA, Abbasivash R, Shokouhi S, Salehi Gharehvaran S. Comparison of the Success Rate of Laryngeal Mask Air Way Insertion in Classic & Rotatory Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7(2):e38899. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.38899
Comparing the Postoperative Sore Throat Incidence and Hemodynamic Changes after Using Macintosh and GlideScope Laryngoscopes and Laryngeal Mask Airway
Masoumifar MA, Ebtehaj M, Kayalha H, shafikhani A. Comparing the Postoperative Sore Throat Incidence and Hemodynamic Changes after Using Macintosh and GlideScope Laryngoscopes and Laryngeal Mask Airway. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;23(6):e156193. doi:
Crossmark
Checking
- Scopus by DOI: 1
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 month ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 4 days ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC