This national registry-based study identified several maternal and neonatal characteristics associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes within the first 2 hours after delivery. Maternal age, hypertensive disorders, previous stillbirth or neonatal death, PROM, non-gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta accreta, fetal arrhythmias, and neonatal sex were associated with one or more neonatal outcomes. Maternal age, PROM, and fetal arrhythmias were also associated with maternal ICU admission or maternal mortality. The strongest associations with early neonatal mortality were observed for previous stillbirth, PROM, a history of neonatal death, non-gestational diabetes mellitus, and fetal arrhythmias.
Female neonates had 17% lower odds of early neonatal mortality than male neonates in the present study. This finding is consistent with previous evidence indicating greater neonatal vulnerability among male neonates. Pongou reported higher infant mortality among males than females (
12), while Aghai et al. similarly found higher early neonatal mortality among male infants in a large registry-based study conducted in India and Pakistan (
13). However, differences in the magnitude of sex-related disparities across studies may reflect differences in study populations, outcome definitions, follow-up periods, and perinatal characteristics. In particular, the present study was restricted to deaths recorded within the first 2 hours after delivery, which limits direct comparisons with studies assessing mortality over longer neonatal or infant follow-up periods.
Fetal arrhythmias were strongly associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, including neonatal hospitalization, stillbirth, and early neonatal mortality. Previous studies have similarly reported increased risks of adverse neonatal outcomes among pregnancies complicated by clinically significant fetal arrhythmias (
14). The magnitude of the associations may differ across studies because fetal arrhythmias comprise a heterogeneous group of rhythm disturbances with varying severity, and registry-based data such as ours do not provide detailed information on arrhythmia subtype, duration, or treatment.
Placenta accreta was also associated with neonatal hospitalization and stillbirth in our study. Previous research has reported higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes among pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta spectrum disorders (
15). Differences in reported effect sizes may partly reflect variation in disease severity, gestational age at delivery, referral patterns, and access to specialized obstetric care.
Advanced maternal age (> 35 years) was associated with 55% higher odds of stillbirth than maternal age of 18 - 35 years. This finding is consistent with the population-based study by Waldenström et al., which also demonstrated an increased risk of stillbirth among women of advanced maternal age (
16). Differences in the magnitude of risk between studies may be related to differences in maternal age categorization, parity, population characteristics, obstetric care, and covariates included in multivariable adjustment.
Maternal hypertensive disorders were associated with approximately twofold higher odds of stillbirth in the present study. This finding is consistent with previous evidence demonstrating associations between hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Bromfield et al. similarly reported increased risks of adverse outcomes among pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders (
17). Differences in the magnitude of associations across studies may reflect differences in the definition and severity of hypertensive disorders, population characteristics, access to prenatal care, and the extent of statistical adjustment.
PROM showed one of the strongest associations with adverse neonatal outcomes, particularly early neonatal mortality and stillbirth. Endale et al. also reported substantial adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes among pregnancies complicated by term PROM, including stillbirth and neonatal mortality (
18). However, direct comparison of effect estimates is limited because their study included only pregnancies with term PROM and did not include a non-PROM comparison group. Differences between studies may also reflect variation in gestational age, duration of membrane rupture, intrauterine infection, obstetric management, and outcome definitions.
A history of adverse pregnancy outcomes was also strongly associated with subsequent neonatal outcomes. Previous stillbirth was associated with markedly higher odds of early neonatal mortality, and a history of neonatal death was associated with hospitalization, stillbirth, and early neonatal mortality. These findings may indicate the persistence of underlying maternal, obstetric, genetic, or health care-related risk factors across pregnancies. However, because the registry did not contain detailed information on the causes of previous stillbirth or neonatal death, the mechanisms underlying these associations could not be further evaluated.
The observed sex difference in neonatal outcomes may partly reflect biological differences between male and female neonates. Previous studies have suggested that the greater vulnerability of male neonates, particularly among preterm infants, may involve a combination of genetic, hormonal, and immunological mechanisms (
19,
20). However, these mechanisms were not directly evaluated in the present registry-based study and should therefore be considered possible explanations rather than causal mechanisms.
From a clinical and public health perspective, the identified associations may help inform risk stratification and surveillance of pregnancies with known maternal or fetal risk factors. Women with a history of stillbirth or neonatal death, PROM, hypertensive disorders, non-gestational diabetes mellitus, advanced maternal age, or fetal arrhythmias may warrant particular attention during prenatal and perinatal assessment. Current recommendations already emphasize blood pressure screening during pregnancy (
21), and our findings further support the importance of recognizing combinations of maternal and fetal risk factors. Nevertheless, because the present study was observational, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence that intensified monitoring or specific interventions will necessarily improve outcomes. Prospective studies are needed before translating these associations into formal clinical recommendations.
A major strength of this study was the use of a large national registry encompassing more than 1.4 million mother-neonate records, which provided substantial statistical power to evaluate multiple maternal and neonatal outcomes. In addition, multinomial logistic regression enabled simultaneous comparison of several mutually exclusive outcome categories using clinically meaningful reference groups.
5.1. Limitations
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting these findings. First, although the study used a national registry extraction with no record-level exclusions, routinely collected registry data may be subject to misclassification and variability in clinical documentation. The registry variables were based on clinician-recorded diagnoses and lacked detailed information on disease severity, timing, treatment, and some clinical subtypes. Second, information on potentially important confounders, including socioeconomic status, maternal lifestyle factors, quality of prenatal care, and other clinical characteristics, was unavailable; therefore, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Third, maternal and neonatal mortality ascertainment was restricted to events recorded within the first 2 hours after delivery; consequently, the findings should not be generalized to mortality occurring later in the neonatal or postpartum period. Finally, because this was an observational registry-based study, causal relationships cannot be established, and the reported odds ratios should be interpreted as measures of association rather than causal effects.
5.2. Conclusions
This national registry-based study identified several maternal and neonatal characteristics associated with adverse outcomes within the first 2 hours after delivery. Maternal hypertensive disorders, previous stillbirth or neonatal death, PROM, non-gestational diabetes mellitus, placenta accreta, fetal arrhythmias, maternal age extremes, and neonatal sex were associated with one or more adverse neonatal outcomes, while maternal age, PROM, and fetal arrhythmias were associated with maternal ICU admission or mortality. The particularly strong associations observed for previous adverse pregnancy outcomes, PROM, and fetal arrhythmias may help identify groups requiring greater clinical attention. However, given the observational design and the limited 2-hour outcome window, these findings should be interpreted as epidemiological associations and require confirmation in prospective studies.