Cover image of the article: Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index methods in determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity

Image Credit:J Inflamm Dis

Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index methods in determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity

Authors

M Shahneshin1,*, T Neyestani
1Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Email: mshahneshin@mail.com

Journal of Inflammatory Diseases:Vol. 16, issue 4; 18-25
Published online:Mar 31, 2013
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Shahneshin M, Neyestani T. Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index methods in determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;16(4):e155723. doi:

Abstract

  Background : Obesity has an increasing trend worldwide. Application of body mass index (BMI) cutoff points to classify obesity in different populations is controversial. On the other hand, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a safe, accurate, reliable, and inexpensive method used in some studies to screen overweight and obesity.   Objective : Comparison of bioelectrical impedance analysis and body mass index methods in determining the prevalence of overweight and obesity.   Methods: This analytical study was performed on 187 healthy women, aged 18 to 45 years (2008). Demographic and anthropometric data were collected by trained students. Body fat percentage (BF%) and body fat mass (BFM) were measured using BIA method. Two BMI cut-off points (≥25 and ≥30 kg/m2) were used as criteria to determine the overweight and obese women, respectively. Also, two BF% cut-off points (≥30 and ≥35%) were considered to define over fat and obesity. One way ANOVA and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used for data analysis.   Findings : The mean age of women was 34.9±8.1 years. BMI, BF% and waist-to-hip ratio were: 27.7 ± 5.8 kg/m2, 35.5 ± 6.9%, and 0.77 ± 0.08, respectively. Central obesity was prevalent in 32.6% of the subjects. The prevalence of obesity determined by BMI and BIA methods was 35.8 and 57.8%, respectively. The women within normal ranges were detected in 28.9 and 23% of subjects using BMI and BIA methods, respectively (P<0.05). Almost half of the women were overweight or obese. Women with higher age had higher BMI compared to other subjects but the difference in body fat percentage was insignificant.   Conclusion: It seems that BIA and BMI methods to act differently in determining the thin, normal, and obese women. The prevalence of obesity was higher when BIA method used.      

Highlights

Copyright

© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
May
2011
Diagnostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Body Mass Index for Detection of Obesity among Students

Diagnostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Body Mass Index for Detection of Obesity among Students

Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Ayatollahi

Ayatollahi SMT. Diagnostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Body Mass Index for Detection of Obesity among Students. Asian J Sports Med. 2011;2(2):e73642. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34777

31
May
2011
Diagnostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Body Mass Index for Detection of Obesity among Students

Diagnostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Body Mass Index for Detection of Obesity among Students

Roya Khanmohammadi,
Marjan Someh,
Farahnaze Ghafarinejad

Khanmohammadi R, Someh M, Ghafarinejad F. Diagnostic Value of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis versus Body Mass Index for Detection of Obesity among Students. Asian J Sports Med. 2011;2(2):e76730. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34785

2
Nov
2024
Evaluation of Body Composition Assessment Methods in Reproductive-Aged Iranian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study Between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)

Evaluation of Body Composition Assessment Methods in Reproductive-Aged Iranian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study Between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)

Elahe Saleh,
Mohammad Ezati Asar,
Shima Moradnejad,
Mohammadreza Ghaneapur

Saleh E, Ezati Asar M, Moradnejad S, Ghaneapur M. Evaluation of Body Composition Assessment Methods in Reproductive-Aged Iranian Women: A Cross-Sectional Study Between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2025;12(3):e141650. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-141650

24
Aug
2024
Validity of Different Anthropometric Indices in the Assessment of Body Composition of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Validity of Different Anthropometric Indices in the Assessment of Body Composition of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Yavuz Ozer,
Didem Gunes Kaya,
Emine Ulgen,
Mehmet Enes Gokler,
Oya Ercan

Ozer Y, Gunes Kaya D, Ulgen E, Enes Gokler M, Ercan O. Validity of Different Anthropometric Indices in the Assessment of Body Composition of Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. Inn J Pediatr. 2024;34(5):e148382. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-148382

31
Aug
2012
The Estimation of the Fat Free Mass Index in Athletes

The Estimation of the Fat Free Mass Index in Athletes

Jeremy P. Loenneke,
Jacob M. Wilson,
Mandy E. Wray,
Jeremy T. Barnes,
Monica L. Kearney,
Thomas J. Pujol

Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Wray ME, Barnes JT, Kearney ML, et al. The Estimation of the Fat Free Mass Index in Athletes. Asian J Sports Med. 2012;3(3):34691. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34691

More by these authors

M ShahneshinPubMedScholar
T NeyestaniPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics