Synergistic Peptide-Antibiotic Approach to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Kim, Choon-Mee; Lee, Seul-Bi; Ko, Young-Jin; Kang, Seong-Ho; Park, Geon; Jang, Sook-Jin

doi:10.5812/jjm-136712

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

e-ISSN 2008-4161

p-ISSN 2008-3645

Cover image of the article: Synergistic Peptide-Antibiotic Approach to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Image Credit:Jundishapur J Microbiol

Outline

Abstract
Footnotes
References
Copyright

https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-136712

Synergistic Peptide-Antibiotic Approach to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Authors

Choon-Mee Kim¹, Seul-Bi Lee², Young-Jin Ko², Seong-Ho Kang², Geon Park², Sook-Jin Jang^2,*

1College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

2Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

*Corresponding Author: Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University, KS008, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. Tel: +82-622203259, Email: sjbjang@chosun.ac.kr

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology:Vol. 16, issue 8; e136712

Published online:Oct 22, 2023

Article type:Research Article

Received:Apr 08, 2023

Accepted:Sep 25, 2023

How to Cite:Kim C, Lee S, Ko Y, Kang S, Park G, et al. Synergistic Peptide-Antibiotic Approach to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2023;16(8):e136712. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-136712

Abstract

Background:

Antibacterial peptides have a broad antibacterial spectrum and are not affected by classical resistance mechanisms; therefore, they can be used in combination with classic antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, making them an alternative for the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Objectives:

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of combining amphiphilic peptides, specifically C12-prp and mastoparan, with antibiotics in combating A. baumannii clinical isolates.

Methods:

We investigated combinations that inhibited the growth of A. baumannii clinical isolates, consisting of 24 extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and 11 pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains collected between January 2004 and December 2014 at Chosun University Hospital using a multiple combination bactericidal test (MCBT). A time-kill study was used to confirm the bactericidal activity and synergism of the four combinations selected via MCBT.

Results:

Four combinations (C₁₂-prp-colistin, C₁₂-prp-rifampicin, mastoparan-colistin, and mastoparan-rifampicin) showed 100% (24/24) synergy with XDR A. baumannii strains. However, in the case of the PDR strains, only two combinations, C₁₂-prp-colistin and mastoparan-colistin, showed a 9.1% (1/11) synergy. Moreover, the mastoparan-colistin and mastoparan-rifampicin combinations showed 100% (24/24) bactericidal activity against the XDR A. baumannii strains, whereas the C₁₂-prp-colistin and C₁₂-prp-rifampicin combinations showed 91.7% (22/24) bactericidal activity. None of the combinations showed bactericidal activity against PDR strains.

Conclusions:

Our study highlighted the substantial synergistic antibacterial efficacy of C₁₂-prp and mastoparan peptides when combined with colistin or rifampicin. Furthermore, this approach could be a promising alternative for developing new treatment strategies for XDR A. baumannii infections.

Highlights

Keywords<i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>Antimicrobial Peptides Colistin Drug Combinations Rifampicin

1. Background

Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen associated with serious infections, such as septicemia, endocarditis, pneumonia, meningitis, and wound infections. It poses a major public health problem as it can resist harsh environmental conditions and various antibiotics. Available antibiotic options for multidrug-resistant (MDR) A. baumannii infections are limited because of increasing resistance and lack of new antibiotics (1). Various treatment regimens such as colistin-, sulbactam-, and tigecycline-based antimicrobial treatments have been reported; however, it is difficult to find optimized treatment strategies for MDR A. baumannii infections (2, 3).

Colistin is one of the last therapeutic options for MDR A. baumannii infections and has been used as a rescue therapy for severe infections. However, colistin resistance has recently been reported worldwide (4). According to a multicenter study in Korea, colistin-carbapenem combination therapy and sulbactam-containing regimens considerably decreased the mortality rate of patients infected with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) (3). Although controversial, combination therapy is considered superior to monotherapy because it often improves clinical outcomes by increasing antibiotic efficacy and decreasing the probability of resistance development (1, 5).

Many studies have investigated the synergistic effects of combinations of various antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides (6-9). Antibacterial peptides have a broad antibacterial spectrum owing to various antibacterial mechanisms; in particular, there is no or low resistance in bacteria owing to their unique microbicidal activity that targets the plasma membrane and causes cell death after membrane destruction (10, 11). Antimicrobial peptides have recently received widespread attention as a promising class of compounds that can be used in combination with classical antibiotics to treat various infections (7, 12).

Short synthetic cationic lipopeptides exhibit excellent broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (13). Among these peptides, synthetic short proline-rich lipopeptides (SPRLPs) are amphiphilic cationic peptides with potent Gram-negative antibacterial activities that act via membrane rupture and lysis (8). Among the SPRLPs, C₁₂-PRP can potentiate the antimicrobial activity of minocycline and rifampin against drug-resistant gram-negative pathogens, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Although C₁₂-PRP with _L-amino acids has a better adjuvant potency than C₁₂-prp with _D-amino acids in combination with rifampin against MDR/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa, C₁₂-PRP is susceptible to non-specific proteolytic degradation by human proteases (8). This indicates that the in vivo efficacy of C₁₂-PRP was lower than that of C₁₂-prp.

Mastoparans are positively charged peptides extracted from wasp venom that are 14 amino acids in length and rich in hydrophobic and basic amino acids (14). Mastoparan-AF exhibits excellent antibacterial activity against various pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and multiple antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 (15, 16). Mastoparan-loaded chitosan nanoconstructs showed synergistic bactericidal effects against MDR A. baumannii; hence, they could be used as potential therapeutic agents (17).

2. Objectives

To date, there have only been a few reports on the efficacy of the combination therapy with amphiphilic peptides C₁₂-prp or mastoparan and various antibiotics against drug-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates. In this study, we investigated the synergistic effect and bactericidal activity of a combination of antibiotics and peptides (C₁₂-prp, mastoparan) against A. baumannii clinical isolates consisting of 24 XDR and 11 pan-drug-resistant (PDR) strains.

3. Methods

3.1. Bacterial Strains and Drugs

We used 35 A. baumannii clinical isolates collected from January 2004 to December 2014 at Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea, which consisted of 24 XDR and 11 PDR strains. Acinetobacter baumannii was initially identified using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy d'Etoile, France). Thereafter, species identification was performed via bla_OXA-51-like and gyrB multiplex polymerase chain reaction (18, 19). Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed using the broth microdilution method according to the Sensititre DKMGN panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, East Grinstead, UK) and VITEK 2 automated system (bioMérieux, France).

Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853) were used as quality controls. Antibiotics were divided into nine categories according to the criteria presented by Magiorakos et al. XDR strains were defined to be resistant to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories, while PDR strains were defined to be resistant to all agents in all antimicrobial categories (20). Two peptides, C₁₂-prp (CH₃(CH₂)₁₀CO-prprprp-NH₂ [all D₁-peptide]) and mastoparan (mastoparan-AF; INLKALAALAKKIL-NH₂), used in this study were synthesized by ANYGEN Co., Ltd. (Gwangju, Korea) (8, 9). All synthetic peptides had > 95% purity. The lyophilized powder was dissolved in sterile distilled water and stored at -70°C until further use. Antibiotics (ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, meropenem, and rifampicin) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

3.2. Susceptibility Testing of C12-prp and Mastoparan

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of C₁₂-prp and mastoparan were determined using the broth dilution method, as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (21). Various concentrations of C₁₂-prp and mastoparan, ranging from 128-0.0625 μg/mL, were used for MIC determination. Briefly, each peptide was added to the Muller-Hinton (MH) broth (BD, USA) with a bacterial inoculum of 5 × 10⁵ colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 20 h. After incubation, the MIC was recorded as the lowest concentration of the agent that showed no visible bacterial growth.

3.3. Multiple Combination Bactericidal Test

We investigated antibiotic-peptide combinations that inhibited the growth of A. baumannii clinical isolates via multiple combination bactericidal test (MCBT) (22). The following peptides and antibiotics were used individually and in combination: 32 µg/mL C₁₂-prp, 2 µg/mL mastoparan, 2 µg/mL ceftazidime, 2 µg/mL cefepime, 2 µg/mL ciprofloxacin, 2 µg/mL colistin, 2 µg/mL meropenem, and 2 µg/mL rifampicin. Antibiotic and peptide solutions were prepared at a concentration 10 times higher than that to be added for each test. Multiple combination bactericidal tests were performed in a 96-well plate (Corning, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Briefly, approximately 5 × 10⁵ CFU/mL of bacteria were inoculated in MH broth containing antibiotics and peptides individually or in combinations (200 μL volume per well of a 96 well-plate) and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. After incubation, 10 μL of cell contents with no visible turbidity and 10 μL of 10-fold diluted suspension were plated directly onto MH agar plates (BD, USA) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Antibiotic-peptide combinations with no colony growth were identified and used in further studies. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

3.4. Time-Kill Assay

Two antibiotics (colistin and rifampicin) that were most effective in inhibiting the growth of A. baumannii clinical isolates in combination with each peptide were selected via MCBT and used for time-kill assay with four combinations (C₁₂-prp-colistin, C₁₂-prp-rifampicin, mastoparan-colistin, and mastoparan-rifampicin). The same concentrations of antibiotics and peptides as those used for MCBT were used in the time-kill study. Each agent was added to 10 mL of MH broth (BD, USA) with a bacterial inoculum of approximately 1 × 10⁶ CFU/mL and incubated in a shaking incubator at 37°C for 24 h. Colony enumeration with 10-fold serially diluted suspensions was performed at 0- and 24-h time points.

Bactericidal activity was defined as a ≥ 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction compared to the initial inoculum at 24 h. As different researchers tend to use different criteria for judging synergism, two commonly used criteria (criteria 1 and 2) were applied in this study. Synergy criterion 1 was defined as ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction with the combination compared to the most active single agent at 24 h. Synergy criterion 2 was defined as ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction with the combination compared with the most active single agent at 24 h and ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction below the initial inoculum at 24 h. Antagonism was defined as a ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL increase with the combination compared to the most active single agent at 24 h. Indifference was defined as a < 2 log₁₀ change in CFU/mL with the combination compared to the most active single agent at 24 h (23, 24).

4. Results

4.1. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of C₁₂-prp and Mastoparan and the Result of Multiple Combination Bactericidal Testing in Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

We determined the MIC for 35 A. baumannii clinical isolates, and the MIC range was 128 to > 128 µg/mL for C₁₂-prp and 2 - 16 µg/mL for mastoparan (Table 1). For the MCBT of antibiotics and peptides, we used 32 µg/mL of C₁₂-prp and 2 µg/mL of mastoparan, which is 1/4 of the MIC₅₀ obtained from 35 A. baumannii clinical isolates. MIC₅₀ is the MIC required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the clinical isolates. The antibiotic-peptide combinations that inhibited the growth of A. baumannii clinical isolates were investigated using the MCBT assay (Table 2).

When C₁₂-prp, mastoparan, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, colistin, meropenem, and rifampicin were used alone, no bactericidal activity was observed against any of the 35 clinical isolates (data not shown). Among the 12 combinations, the C₁₂-prp-colistin, C₁₂-prp-rifampicin, mastoparan-colistin, and mastoparan-rifampicin combinations showed more than 94.3% (33/35) inhibitory activity against the XDR and PDR strains of A. baumannii clinical isolates. However, the combinations of C₁₂-prp or mastoparan peptide with ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, and meropenem did not inhibit the bacterial growth of any of the 35 clinical isolates.

Table 1.

Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of C₁₂-prp and Mastoparan in Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

	Isolates	MIC of C₁₂-prp (µg/mL)	MIC of Mastoparan (µg/mL)
XDR	321-21	128	4
XDR	321-45	> 128	4
XDR	321-63	> 128	8
XDR	321-79	128	4
XDR	321-87	> 128	8
XDR	321-93	128	4
XDR	322-18	> 128	8
XDR	322-19	128	16
XDR	322-23	128	16
XDR	322-45	128	4
XDR	322-49	> 128	8
XDR	322-94	128	16
XDR	323-21	128	8
XDR	323-52	> 128	4
XDR	323-74	128	8
XDR	324-45	> 128	8
XDR	324-77	128	8
XDR	325-51	> 128	4
XDR	325-74	> 128	8
XDR	326-77	128	8
XDR	326-79	> 128	8
XDR	327-62	128	8
XDR	327-69	> 128	4
XDR	327-75	> 128	2
PDR	348-11	128	8
PDR	348-12	> 128	8
PDR	348-13	> 128	16
PDR	348-14	> 128	16
PDR	348-15	128	8
PDR	348-22	> 128	16
PDR	348-23	128	16
PDR	348-24	128	16
PDR	348-25	> 128	16
PDR	348-26	> 128	16
PDR	348-33	> 128	8

Abbreviations: MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; XDR, extensively drug-resistant; PDR, pandrug-resistant.

Table 2.

Results of Multiple Combination Bactericidal Tests According to the Combination of Amphiphilic Peptides (C₁₂-prp, Mastoparan) and Classical Antibiotics Against Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Groups of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

Combination of Antibiotics and Peptides ^a	% (No.) of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates Inhibited
C₁₂-prp-ceftazdime	0 (0/35)
C₁₂-prp-cepefime	0 (0/35)
C₁₂-prp-ciprofloxacin	0 (0/35)
C₁₂-prp-colistin	97.1 (34/35)
C₁₂-prp-meropenem	0 (0/35)
C₁₂-prp-rifampicin	100 (35/35)
Mastoparan-ceftazdime	0 (0/35)
Mastoparan-cepefime	0 (0/35)
Mastoparan-ciprofloxacin	0 (0/35)
Mastoparan-colistin	94.3 (33/35)
Mastoparan-meropenem	0 (0/35)
Mastoparan-rifampicin	94.3 (33/35)

^a 2 µg/mL of ceftazidime; 2 µg/mL of cefepime; 2 µg/mL of ciprofloxacin; 2 µg/mL of colistin; 2 µg/mL of meropenem; 2 µg/mL of rifampicin; 32 µg/mL of C₁₂-prp; 2 µg/mL of mastoparan.

4.2. Results of the Time-Kill Assays

We performed time-kill assays for the C₁₂-prp-colistin, C₁₂-prp-rifampicin, mastoparan-colistin, and mastoparan-rifampicin combinations in 35 A. baumannii clinical isolates. When 32 µg/mL of C₁₂-crp or 2 µg/mL of colistin were added alone, bactericidal activity with a reduction of ≥ 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL compared with the initial inoculums at 24 h was not observed in any of the 35 clinical isolates. However, in the C₁₂-prp-colistin combination group, bactericidal activity was observed in 22 out of 24 XDR strains but not in the 11 PDR strains. Synergy on applying criterion 1 was observed in all 24 (100%) XDR strains and in one out of 11 (9.1%) PDR strains in the C₁₂-prp-colistin combination. Synergy on applying criterion 2 was observed in 23 out of 24 (95.8%) XDR strains but not in the PDR strains. In addition, no antagonism was observed for any of the 35 clinical isolates (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3.

Results of Time-Kill Assay and Bactericidality of C₁₂-prp-Colistin and C₁₂-prp-Rifampicin Combinations Against Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

Bacterial Strain	Log₁₀ (VC) at 24 h			Log₁₀ (VC of Combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Synergy	Log₁₀ (VC of 24 h) - Log₁₀ (VC of 0 h)	Synergy	BA ^e	Log₁₀ (VC) at 24 h			Log₁₀ (VC of combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Synergy	Log₁₀ (VC of 24 h) - Log₁₀ (VC of 0 h)	Synergy	BA ^e
Bacterial Strain	C₁₂-prp ^a	Colistin ^b	C₁₂-prp + Colistin	Log₁₀ (VC of Combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Criteria 1 ^c	C₁₂-prp + Colistin	Criteria 2 ^d	C₁₂-prp + Colistin	C₁₂-prp ^a	Rifampicin ^b	C₁₂-prp + Rifampicin	Log₁₀ (VC of combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Criteria 1 ^c	C₁₂-prp + Rifampicin	Criteria 2 ^d	C₁₂-prp + Rifampicin
321-21	10.88	8.32	0.00	-8.32	S	-6.69	S	B	10.88	7.81	0.00	-7.81	S	-6.69	S	B
321-45	10.84	9.10	0.00	-9.10	S	-6.87	S	B	10.84	7.51	0.00	-7.51	S	-6.87	S	B
321-63	10.71	7.82	0.00	-7.82	S	-5.97	S	B	10.71	7.93	0.00	-7.93	S	-5.97	S	B
321-79	10.65	7.60	0.00	-7.60	S	-5.91	S	B	10.65	7.73	0.00	-7.73	S	-5.91	S	B
321-87	10.82	7.90	3.12	-4.78	S	-2.76	S	NB	10.82	7.61	0.00	-7.61	S	-5.88	S	B
321-93	10.86	7.67	0.00	-7.67	S	-5.92	S	B	10.86	7.77	0.00	-7.77	S	-5.92	S	B
322-18	10.88	8.23	3.56	-4.67	S	-3.17	S	B	10.88	7.20	2.00	-5.20	S	-4.74	S	B
322-19	10.64	8.17	0.00	-8.17	S	-6.79	S	B	10.64	6.80	0.00	-6.80	S	-6.79	S	B
322-23	10.67	7.71	0.00	-7.71	S	-5.59	S	B	10.67	7.96	0.00	-7.96	S	-5.59	S	B
322-45	10.44	7.85	0.00	-7.85	S	-5.44	S	B	10.44	7.82	3.30	-4.52	S	-2.14	S	NB
322-49	10.84	7.81	0.00	-7.81	S	-5.65	S	B	10.84	6.82	0.00	-6.82	S	-5.65	S	B
322-94	10.88	7.74	3.88	-3.85	S	-1.77	I	NB	10.88	7.86	0.00	-7.86	S	-5.66	S	B
323-21	10.80	7.52	0.00	-7.52	S	-6.85	S	B	10.80	6.73	0.00	-6.73	S	-6.85	S	B
323-52	10.94	9.23	0.00	-9.23	S	-6.66	S	B	10.94	8.08	0.00	-8.08	S	-6.66	S	B
323-74	10.57	8.08	0.00	-8.08	S	-6.37	S	B	10.57	7.61	3.67	-3.94	S	-2.70	S	NB
324-45	10.93	8.82	0.00	-8.82	S	-5.71	S	B	10.93	7.95	0.00	-7.95	S	-5.71	S	B
324-77	11.01	7.72	0.00	-7.72	S	-5.59	S	B	11.01	8.38	0.00	-8.38	S	-5.59	S	B
325-51	10.90	7.95	0.00	-7.95	S	-5.75	S	B	10.90	8.02	0.00	-8.02	S	-5.75	S	B
325-74	10.91	7.72	0.00	-7.72	S	-5.92	S	B	10.91	7.56	0.00	-7.56	S	-5.92	S	B
326-77	10.79	7.62	0.00	-7.62	S	-5.95	S	B	10.79	7.63	0.00	-7.63	S	-5.95	S	B
326-79	10.71	8.58	0.00	-8.58	S	-5.91	S	B	10.71	7.77	0.00	-7.77	S	-5.91	S	B
327-62	10.76	7.72	0.00	-7.72	S	-5.90	S	B	10.76	7.53	0.00	-7.53	S	-5.90	S	B
327-69	10.74	7.53	0.00	-7.53	S	-5.93	S	B	10.74	7.47	0.00	-7.47	S	-5.93	S	B
327-75	10.78	7.41	0.00	-7.41	S	-5.67	S	B	10.78	7.90	0.00	-7.90	S	-5.67	S	B
348-11	10.95	8.83	5.98	-2.85	S	-0.65	I	NB	10.95	7.89	6.96	-0.93	I	0.32	I	NB
348-12	11.01	7.97	6.90	-1.08	I	1.02	I	NB	11.01	7.99	6.99	-1.01	I	1.11	I	NB
348-13	10.97	7.95	6.95	-1.00	I	0.96	I	NB	10.97	7.18	5.92	-1.25	I	-0.06	I	NB
348-14	10.90	7.96	6.92	-1.04	I	1.00	I	NB	10.90	6.93	6.80	-0.13	I	0.89	I	NB
348-15	10.88	6.83	6.84	0.01	I	0.94	I	NB	10.88	6.92	6.80	-0.13	I	0.89	I	NB
348-22	10.89	7.88	6.99	-0.89	I	0.19	I	NB	10.89	6.90	6.99	0.09	I	0.19	I	NB
348-23	10.95	7.92	6.93	-0.99	I	0.12	I	NB	10.95	7.92	6.86	-1.07	I	0.04	I	NB
348-24	10.81	7.90	6.75	-1.14	I	-0.19	I	NB	10.81	6.77	6.81	0.04	I	-0.13	I	NB
348-25	10.94	6.93	6.85	-0.08	I	0.05	I	NB	10.94	7.86	6.91	-0.95	I	0.11	I	NB
348-26	10.74	7.79	7.92	0.12	I	2.10	I	NB	10.74	7.88	7.97	0.09	I	2.15	I	NB
348-33	10.84	6.90	5.91	-0.99	I	0.05	I	NB	10.84	6.84	6.77	-0.07	I	0.90	I	NB

Abbreviations: NB, non-bactericidal; S, synergy; I, indifference; VC, viable coun; MASA, most active single agent; BA, bactericidality; CFU, colony-forming unit.

^a C₁₂-prp 32 µg/mL.

^b Colistin 2 µg/mL, rifampicin 2 µg/mL.

^c ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction with the combination compared with the most active single agent at 24 h.

^d ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction with the combination compared with the most active single agent and ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction below the initial inoculum at 24 h.

^e ≥ 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction compared with the initial inoculums.

Table 4.

Comparison of Time-Kill Assay Results of Peptides (C₁₂-prp, Mastoparan) and Antibiotics Combination Against Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Groups of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

Combination of Antibiotics and Peptides and Interaction	XDR % (No.)	PDR % (No.)	Total % (No.)
C₁₂-prp + colistin
Synergy (criteria 1)	100 (24/24)	9.1 (1/11)	71.4 (25/35)
Synergy (criteria 2)	95.8 (23/24)	0 (0/11)	65.7 (23/35)
Indifference	4.2 (1/24)	100 (11/11)	34.3 (12/35)
Antagonism	0 (0/24)	0 (0/11)	0 (0/35)
Bactericidality	91.7 (22/24)	0 (0/11)	62.9 (22/35)
C₁₂-prp + rifampicin
Synergy (criteria 1)	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)
Synergy (criteria 2)	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)
Indifference	0 (0/24)	100 (11/11)	31.4 (11/35)
Antagonism	0 (0/24)	0 (0/11)	0 (0/35)
Bactericidality	91.7 (22/24)	0 (0/11)	62.9 (22/35)
Mastoparan + colistin
Synergy (criteria 1)	100 (24/24)	9.1 (1/11)	71.4 (25/35)
Synergy (criteria 2)	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)
Indifference	0 (0/24)	100 (11/11)	31.4 (11/35)
Antagonism	0 (0/24)	0 (0/11)	0 (0/35)
Bactericidality	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)
Mastoparan + rifampicin
Synergy (criteria 1)	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)
Synergy (criteria 2)	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)
Indifference	0 (0/24)	100 (11/11)	31.4 (11/35)
Antagonism	0 (0/24)	0 (0/11)	0 (0/35)
Bactericidality	100 (24/24)	0 (0/11)	68.6 (24/35)

Abbreviations: XDR, extensively drug-resistant; PDR, pandrug-resistant.

In the C₁₂-prp-rifampicin combination assay, the addition of 2 µg/mL rifampicin alone did not significantly inhibit the bacterial growth, but the combination of C₁₂-prp-rifampicin showed bactericidal activity in 22 out of 24 (91.7%) XDR strains, but not in the PDR strains. In addition, synergy on applying criteria 1 and 2 was observed in all 24 (100%) XDR strains but not in the PDR strains, and antagonism was not observed in any of the 35 clinical isolates with the C₁₂-prp-rifampicin combination (Tables 3 and 4). In the mastoparan-colistin combination assay, bactericidal activity was not observed in any of the 35 clinical isolates in the mastoparan or colistin-alone groups. However, with the mastoparan-colistin combination, bactericidal activity was observed in all 24 (100%) XDR strains but not in the 11 PDR strains. Synergy on applying criterion 1 was observed in all 24 (100%) XDR strains and in one out of 11 (9.1%) PDR strains in the mastoparan-colistin combination. Synergy on applying criterion 2 was observed in all 24 (100%) XDR strains but not in PDR strains. In addition, no antagonism was observed in any of the 35 clinical isolates (Tables 5 and 4).

Table 5.

Results of Time-Kill Assay and Bactericidality of Mastoparan-Colistin and Mastoparan-Rifampicin Combinations Against Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates

Bacterial Strain	Log₁₀ (VC) at 24 h			Log₁₀ (VC of combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Synergy	Log₁₀ (VC of 24 h) - Log₁₀ (VC of 0 h)	Synergy	BA ^e	Log₁₀ (VC) at 24 h			Log₁₀ (VC of Combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Synergy	Log₁₀ (VC of 24 h) - Log₁₀ (VC of 0 h)	Synergy	BA ^e
Bacterial Strain	MS ^a	Colistin ^b	MS + Colistin	Log₁₀ (VC of combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Criteria 1 ^c	MS + Colistin	Criteria 2 ^d	MS + Colistin	MS ^a	Rifampicin ^b	MS + Rifampicin	Log₁₀ (VC of Combination) - Log₁₀ (VC_MASA) at 24 h	Criteria 1 ^c	MS + Rifampicin	Criteria 2 ^d	MS + Rifampicin
321-21	10.92	7.95	0.00	-7.95	S	-5.95	S	B	10.92	7.03	0.00	-7.03	S	-5.95	S	B
321-45	10.88	6.79	0.00	-6.79	S	-6.00	S	B	10.88	7.97	0.00	-7.97	S	-6.00	S	B
321-63	10.69	6.88	0.00	-6.88	S	-6.96	S	B	10.69	6.91	0.00	-6.91	S	-6.96	S	B
321-79	10.91	6.90	0.00	-6.90	S	-6.93	S	B	10.91	6.92	0.00	-6.92	S	-6.93	S	B
321-87	10.91	6.94	0.00	-6.94	S	-6.90	S	B	10.91	6.83	0.00	-6.83	S	-6.90	S	B
321-93	10.87	7.83	0.00	-7.83	S	-5.71	S	B	10.87	7.95	0.00	-7.95	S	-5.71	S	B
322-18	10.95	7.01	0.00	-7.01	S	-5.81	S	B	10.95	6.40	0.00	-6.40	S	-5.81	S	B
322-19	10.72	6.72	0.00	-6.72	S	-6.90	S	B	10.72	6.76	0.00	-6.76	S	-6.90	S	B
322-23	10.92	6.95	0.00	-6.95	S	-6.72	S	B	10.92	6.88	0.00	-6.88	S	-6.72	S	B
322-45	10.94	6.83	0.00	-6.83	S	-6.91	S	B	10.94	6.62	0.00	-6.62	S	-6.91	S	B
322-49	10.81	6.90	0.00	-6.90	S	-6.88	S	B	10.81	6.78	0.00	-6.78	S	-6.88	S	B
322-94	10.87	7.78	0.00	-7.78	S	-5.90	S	B	10.87	6.80	0.00	-6.80	S	-5.90	S	B
323-21	10.96	6.91	0.00	-6.91	S	-5.96	S	B	10.96	6.86	0.00	-6.86	S	-5.96	S	B
323-52	10.92	6.79	0.00	-6.79	S	-5.97	S	B	10.92	6.83	0.00	-6.83	S	-5.97	S	B
323-74	10.91	6.75	0.00	-6.75	S	-5.90	S	B	10.91	6.94	0.00	-6.94	S	-5.90	S	B
324-45	10.64	7.93	0.00	-7.93	S	-5.72	S	B	10.64	7.93	0.00	-7.93	S	-5.72	S	B
324-77	10.86	6.71	0.00	-6.71	S	-5.66	S	B	10.86	6.04	0.00	-6.04	S	-5.66	S	B
325-51	10.61	6.91	0.00	-6.91	S	-5.88	S	B	10.61	6.90	0.00	-6.90	S	-5.88	S	B
325-74	10.77	6.97	0.00	-6.97	S	-5.70	S	B	10.77	6.88	0.00	-6.88	S	-5.70	S	B
326-77	10.70	6.93	0.00	-6.93	S	-5.80	S	B	10.70	6.93	0.00	-6.93	S	-5.80	S	B
326-79	10.69	6.93	0.00	-6.93	S	-5.68	S	B	10.69	6.89	0.00	-6.89	S	-5.68	S	B
327-62	10.86	6.76	0.00	-6.76	S	-5.84	S	B	10.86	6.78	0.00	-6.78	S	-5.84	S	B
327-69	10.76	6.95	0.00	-6.95	S	-5.85	S	B	10.76	6.95	0.00	-6.95	S	-5.85	S	B
327-75	10.91	6.88	0.00	-6.88	S	-5.94	S	B	10.91	6.86	0.00	-6.86	S	-5.94	S	B
348-11	10.94	8.98	5.90	-3.07	S	-0.84	I	NB	10.94	7.99	6.90	-1.10	I	0.16	I	NB
348-12	10.92	8.02	6.90	-1.12	I	1.03	I	NB	10.92	7.91	7.00	-0.91	I	1.13	I	NB
348-13	11.03	7.95	7.04	-0.91	I	1.05	I	NB	11.03	7.19	5.97	-1.23	I	-0.02	I	NB
348-14	11.03	7.89	6.00	-1.89	I	0.03	I	NB	11.03	6.96	6.92	-0.04	I	0.95	I	NB
348-15	10.89	6.79	7.01	0.23	I	1.08	I	NB	10.89	7.02	7.00	-0.02	I	1.06	I	NB
348-22	10.84	7.94	6.99	-0.94	I	0.11	I	NB	10.84	6.92	7.00	0.08	I	0.12	I	NB
348-23	10.96	7.90	7.06	-0.84	I	0.27	I	NB	10.96	7.79	6.95	-0.84	I	0.16	I	NB
348-24	10.91	7.95	7.07	-0.88	I	0.07	I	NB	10.91	6.85	6.98	0.14	I	-0.02	I	NB
348-25	11.02	6.95	6.98	0.04	I	0.04	I	NB	11.02	7.85	6.90	-0.95	I	-0.04	I	NB
348-26	10.91	7.99	7.97	-0.01	I	1.95	I	NB	10.91	7.95	7.93	-0.02	I	1.90	I	NB
348-33	10.90	6.78	6.00	-0.78	I	0.23	I	NB	10.90	6.79	7.09	0.30	I	1.33	I	NB

Abbreviations: MS, mastoparan NB, non-bactericidal; S, synergy; I, indifference; VC, viable count; MASA, most active single agent; BA, bactericidality; CFU, colony-forming unit.

^a 2 µg/mL.

^b Colistin 2 µg/mL, rifampicin 2 µg/mL.

^c ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction with the combination compared with the most active single agent at 24 h.

^d ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction with the combination compared with the most active single agent and ≥ 2 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction below the initial inoculum at 24 h.

^e ≥ 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL reduction compared with the initial inoculums.

In the mastoparan-rifampicin combination assay, the addition of 2 µg/mL of mastoparan or 2 µg/mL rifampicin alone did not significantly inhibit the bacterial growth, but the combination of mastoparan-rifampicin showed bactericidal activity in all 24 (100%) XDR strains, but not in the 11 PDR strains. In addition, synergy on applying criteria 1 and 2 was observed in all 24 (100%) XDR strains but not in the PDR strains, and antagonism was not seen in any of the 35 clinical isolates with the mastoparan-rifampicin combination (Tables 5 and 4).

5. Discussion

Combination therapy using various drugs against Acinetobacter infections remains controversial. However, several in vitro studies have reported the synergistic effects of combination therapy for treating Acinetobacter infections and have postulated it to be beneficial despite a lack of direct evidence (25). Antibiotic resistance of A. baumannii has been continuously reported, increasing the need for new therapies to overcome this resistance. In particular, treating Acinetobacter infections caused by the MDR, XDR, and PDR groups of A. baumannii strains is a real medical challenge. This study demonstrated that C₁₂-prp and mastoparan peptides exhibit potent synergistic antibacterial activity when combined with colistin or rifampicin against XDR A. baumannii clinical isolates.

The combination of C₁₂-prp-colistin showed 100% (24/24) synergy against XDR A. baumannii strains; however, only 9.1% (1/11) against PDR strains. It is believed that the amphiphilic cationic lipopeptide C₁₂-prp and cationic polypeptide colistin synergistically destroy the outer membrane of XDR A. baumannii and exhibit bactericidal activity. Domalaon et al. reported that SPRLP and C₁₂-PRP could potentiate the efficacy of minocycline and rifampin by disrupting the bacterial membrane, followed by enhanced antibiotic uptake (8).

Proteins and naturally occurring peptides are composed of amino acids in _L-configuration. Therefore, proteins composed of _D-amino acids have high resistance to protease degradation and low immunogenicity in vivo compared to those composed of _L-amino acids, which increase their gut, blood, and intracellular half-life (26). Therefore, in this study, we chose the _D-lipopeptide analog C₁₂-prp, rather than C₁₂-PRP with _L-amino acids, for the antibiotic-antimicrobial peptide combination study. Domalaon et al. reported that amphiphilic C₁₂-PRP might be susceptible to non-specific proteolysis by human proteases, whereas proteolysis-resistant C₁₂-prp retains its adjuvant properties with a slightly decreased potency compared to C₁₂-PRP (8).

The potential of combination therapy with colistin, lipopeptide, or glycopeptide antibiotics for treating MDR A. baumannii has been reported (27). Gordon et al. reported combining colistin and the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin showed synergistic effects and sustained bactericidal activity against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strains. The results of the E-test for 34 MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates showed that vancomycin MIC was reduced from > 256 μg/mL to ≤ 48 μg/mL with 0.5 μg/mL colistin. In addition, a combination of 20 μg/mL vancomycin and 1 μg/mL colistin showed bactericidal activity, except for the regrowth of one strain in a time-kill study using ATCC 19606 and five colistin-susceptible MDR A. baumannii strains (28).

Galani et al. reported synergy in 16 (53.3%) of 30 combinations tested with various concentrations of colistin (0.25 ×, 0.5 ×, and 1 × MIC) and 10 μg/mL of the lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin in time-kill studies using 10 colistin-susceptible MDR A. baumannii isolates (29). The cationic polypeptide colistin interacts with the anionic lipopolysaccharide layer of gram-negative bacteria and induces the osmotic lysis of cells. According to Gordon et al. (28) as a synergistic mechanism of colistin-vancomycin combination, the cell-permeabilizing properties of colistin disrupt the outer membrane of the bacteria, thereby improving the penetration of vancomycin through the A. baumannii outer membrane to reach the action site of the cell wall (27, 28).

In this study, mastoparan-colistin and mastoparan-rifampicin combinations showed 100% (24/24) synergy against XDR strains in the time-kill assay. However, in the case of PDR A. baumannii strains, only mastoparan-colistin showed 9.1% (1/11) synergy, whereas the mastoparan-rifampicin combination showed no synergistic effect. Vila-Farres et al. reported that mastoparan isolated from the Vespula lewisii venom exhibited good antimicrobial activity with lower MICs against colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant A. baumannii than other antimicrobial peptides such as buforin I, β-defensin (30).

In a 2017 study by Lin et al., the combined effects of mastoparan-AF and clinically used antibiotics were evaluated against seven MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates using the fractional inhibitory concentration index. Mastoparan-AF showed synergistic activity against six of the seven MDR A. baumannii strains when combined with colistin, two strains when combined with ciprofloxacin, and six strains when combined with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. However, mastoparan-AF showed no difference when combined with ampicillin, cephalothin, gentamicin, or neomycin (9). In 2023, Lin et al. reported that mastoparan-AF killed multiple antibiotic-resistant hemolytic E. coli O157:H7 cells through multiple membrane disruption patterns by adopting the 3 - 11 amphipathic helix-type structure of mastoparan, facilitating membrane interaction (15).

Therefore, it is important to identify the appropriate combination of antibiotics for combination therapy in treating infectious diseases. The synergy rates of antibiotics or antibiotic-antimicrobial peptide combinations may vary according to the test method used, such as the time-kill assay, E-test, Checkerboard test, type of antibiotics, and degree of bacterial resistance (31). Aaron et al. reported that MCBT can be a useful technique to screen bactericidal antibiotic combinations for treating cystic fibrosis associated with Burkholderia cepacia strains (22). In this study, we used the MCBT assay to identify antibiotic-peptide combinations that inhibited the growth of A. baumannii clinical isolates and found that four combinations (C₁₂-prp-colistin, C₁₂-prp-rifampicin, mastoparan-colistin, and mastoparan-rifampicin) presented more than 94.3% inhibitory activity against XDR and PDR A. baumannii clinical isolates. When used alone, the peptides and antibiotics at the concentrations used in MCBT did not show any inhibitory effects.

Antimicrobial peptides may serve as an alternative treatment option for bacterial infections. Antimicrobial peptides have a broad antibiotic spectrum and are not affected by classical resistance mechanisms to conventional antibiotics; therefore, they are frequently used to develop new therapeutic strategies (32). As the development of new therapeutic agents to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections, especially A. baumannii infections, is urgently required, antimicrobial peptides that show strong synergistic effects when combined with classical antibiotics can be excellent alternatives for developing new therapeutic strategies. In this study, the potential of C₁₂-prp-colistin and mastoparan-rifampicin combinations to inhibit multidrug-resistant A. baumannii growth was reported for the first time.

5.1. Conclusions

In conclusion, C₁₂-prp and mastoparan showed 100% synergy and ≥ 91.7% bactericidal activity (91.7% for C₁₂-prp and 100% for mastoparan) in combination with rifampicin or colistin against 24 XDR A. baumannii clinical isolates. However, for the 11 PDR A. baumannii clinical isolates, only two combinations, C₁₂-prp-colistin and mastoparan-colistin, showed 9.1% (1/11) synergy. These results indicate that C₁₂-prp and mastoparan peptides show potent synergistic antibacterial activity when combined with colistin or rifampicin, making them good candidates for the in vivo studies of XDR A. baumannii infections.

Footnotes

Authors' Contribution: C. M. K. contributed to the design and investigation and drafted and revised the manuscript. S. B. L. contributed to the investigation and methodology and drafted the manuscript. Y. J. K. contributed to data curation, formal analysis, and supervision. S. H. K. contributed to the investigation and validation. G. P. contributed to conceptualization and visualization. S. J. J. conceived, supervised, funded the acquisition, drafted, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
Data Reproducibility: The dataset presented in the study is available on request from the corresponding author during submission or after publication.
Funding/Support: This research was supported by the basic science research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03034821). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

References

1.
Alrahmany D, Omar AF, Harb G, El Nekidy WS, Ghazi IM. Acinetobacter baumannii infections in hospitalized patients, treatment outcomes. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(6):630. [PubMed ID: 34070398]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8229601]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060630.
2.
Jung SY, Lee SH, Lee SY, Yang S, Noh H, Chung EK, et al. Antimicrobials for the treatment of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in critically ill patients: a systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):319. [PubMed ID: 29262831]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5738897]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1916-6.
3.
Seok H, Choi WS, Lee S, Moon C, Park DW, Song JY, et al. What is the optimal antibiotic treatment strategy for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)? A multicentre study in Korea. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021;24:429-39. [PubMed ID: 33571708]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.01.018.
4.
Elham B, Fawzia A. Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from critically ill patients: clinical characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility and outcome. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(3):2400-6. [PubMed ID: 32127810]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7040249]. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i3.13.
5.
Schmid A, Wolfensberger A, Nemeth J, Schreiber PW, Sax H, Kuster SP. Monotherapy versus combination therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15290. [PubMed ID: 31664064]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6821042]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51711-x.
6.
Walkenhorst WF. Using adjuvants and environmental factors to modulate the activity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1858(5):926-35. [PubMed ID: 26751595]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.12.034.
7.
Pizzolato-Cezar LR, Okuda-Shinagawa NM, Machini MT. Combinatory therapy antimicrobial peptide-antibiotic to minimize the ongoing rise of resistance. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1703. [PubMed ID: 31447797]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6695574]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01703.
8.
Domalaon R, Sanchak Y, Koskei LC, Lyu Y, Zhanel GG, Arthur G, et al. Short proline-rich lipopeptide potentiates minocycline and rifampin against multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(4). [PubMed ID: 29437631]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5914005]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02374-17.
9.
Lin CH, Lee MC, Tzen JTC, Lee HM, Chang SM, Tu WC, et al. Efficacy of Mastoparan-AF alone and in combination with clinically used antibiotics on nosocomial multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017;24(5):1023-9. [PubMed ID: 28663698]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5478288]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.12.013.
10.
Aisenbrey C, Marquette A, Bechinger B. The mechanisms of action of cationic antimicrobial peptides refined by novel concepts from biophysical investigations. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1117:33-64. [PubMed ID: 30980352]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3588-4_4.
11.
Kumar P, Kizhakkedathu JN, Straus SK. Antimicrobial peptides: Diversity, mechanism of action and strategies to improve the activity and biocompatibility in vivo. Biomolecules. 2018;8(1):4. [PubMed ID: 29351202]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5871973]. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom8010004.
12.
Lewies A, Du Plessis LH, Wentzel JF. Antimicrobial peptides: The achilles' heel of antibiotic resistance? Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2019;11(2):370-81. [PubMed ID: 30229514]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-018-9465-0.
13.
Laverty G, McLaughlin M, Shaw C, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Antimicrobial activity of short, synthetic cationic lipopeptides. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2010;75(6):563-9. [PubMed ID: 20374251]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2010.00973.x.
14.
Hilchie AL, Sharon AJ, Haney EF, Hoskin DW, Bally MB, Franco OL, et al. Mastoparan is a membranolytic anti-cancer peptide that works synergistically with gemcitabine in a mouse model of mammary carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1858(12):3195-204. [PubMed ID: 27693190]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5097029]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.09.021.
15.
Lin CH, Shyu CL, Wu ZY, Wang CM, Chiou SH, Chen JY, et al. Antimicrobial peptide mastoparan-AF kills multi-antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 via multiple membrane disruption patterns and likely by adopting 3-11 amphipathic helices to favor membrane interaction. Membranes (Basel). 2023;13(2):251. [PubMed ID: 36837754]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9961542]. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13020251.
16.
Lin CH, Tzen JT, Shyu CL, Yang MJ, Tu WC. Structural and biological characterization of mastoparans in the venom of Vespa species in Taiwan. Peptides. 2011;32(10):2027-36. [PubMed ID: 21884742]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.08.015.
17.
Hassan A, Ikram A, Raza A, Saeed S, Zafar Paracha R, Younas Z, et al. Therapeutic potential of novel mastoparan-chitosan nanoconstructs against clinical MDR Acinetobacter baumannii: In silico, in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:3755-73. [PubMed ID: 34103914]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8179793]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S296717.
18.
Feizabadi MM, Fathollahzadeh B, Taherikalani M, Rasoolinejad M, Sadeghifard N, Aligholi M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and distribution of blaOXA genes among Acinetobacter spp. Isolated from patients at Tehran hospitals. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008;61(4):274-8. [PubMed ID: 18653968].
19.
Lee MJ, Jang SJ, Li XM, Park G, Kook JK, Kim MJ, et al. Comparison of rpoB gene sequencing, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, gyrB multiplex PCR, and the VITEK2 system for identification of Acinetobacter clinical isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78(1):29-34. [PubMed ID: 24157058]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.07.013.
20.
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268-81. [PubMed ID: 21793988]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x.
21.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M100-S28: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 28th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018.
22.
Aaron SD, Ferris W, Henry DA, Speert DP, Macdonald NE. Multiple combination bactericidal antibiotic testing for patients with cystic fibrosis infected with Burkholderia cepacia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(4 Pt 1):1206-12. [PubMed ID: 10764313]. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.4.9907147.
23.
Park GC, Choi JA, Jang SJ, Jeong SH, Kim CM, Choi IS, et al. In vitro interactions of antibiotic combinations of colistin, tigecycline, and doripenem against extensively drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Ann Lab Med. 2016;36(2):124-30. [PubMed ID: 26709259]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4713845]. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2016.36.2.124.
24.
Tan TY, Lim TP, Lee WHL, Sasikala S, Hsu LY, Kwa ALH. In vitro antibiotic synergy in extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: The effect of testing by time-kill, checkerboard, and etest methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(1):436-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00850-10.
25.
Tuon FF, Rocha JL, Merlini AB. Combined therapy for multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection--is there evidence outside the laboratory? J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(9):951-9. [PubMed ID: 26220079]. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000144.
26.
Garton M, Nim S, Stone TA, Wang KE, Deber CM, Kim PM. Method to generate highly stable D-amino acid analogs of bioactive helical peptides using a mirror image of the entire PDB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(7):1505-10. [PubMed ID: 29378946]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5816147]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711837115.
27.
Claeys KC, Fiorvento AD, Rybak MJ. A review of novel combinations of colistin and lipopeptide or glycopeptide antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect Dis Ther. 2014;3(2):69-81. [PubMed ID: 25475412]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4269621]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-014-0051-9.
28.
Gordon NC, Png K, Wareham DW. Potent synergy and sustained bactericidal activity of a vancomycin-colistin combination versus multidrug-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(12):5316-22. [PubMed ID: 20876375]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2981237]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00922-10.
29.
Galani I, Orlandou K, Moraitou H, Petrikkos G, Souli M. Colistin/daptomycin: An unconventional antimicrobial combination synergistic in vitro against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43(4):370-4. [PubMed ID: 24560919]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.12.010.
30.
Vila-Farres X, Garcia de la Maria C, Lopez-Rojas R, Pachon J, Giralt E, Vila J. In vitro activity of several antimicrobial peptides against colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(4):383-7. [PubMed ID: 21672084]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03581.x.
31.
Ni W, Cui J, Liang B, Cai Y, Bai N, Cai X, et al. In vitro effects of tigecycline in combination with colistin (polymyxin E) and sulbactam against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2013;66(12):705-8. [PubMed ID: 23981963]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ja.2013.84.
32.
das Neves RC, Mortari MR, Schwartz EF, Kipnis A, Junqueira-Kipnis AP. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of peptides from venom of social wasp and scorpion on multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(4):216. [PubMed ID: 30974767]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6520840]. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins11040216.

Copyright

Copyright © 2023, Kim et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Outline

Synergistic Peptide-Antibiotic Approach to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii