1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Plant Collection and Preparation of the Leaf Extract
3.2. Animals and Treatments
3.3. Blood Collection and Biochemical Analysis
3.4. Histopathological Examination
3.5. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Blood Glucose and Lipid Profiles
| Group, N = 6 | Blood Glucose, mg/dL | |
|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 3 | |
| HC | 91.06 ± 14.25 | 100.33 ± 11.37 |
| HC + E | 88.29 ± 17.26 | 99.20 ± 8.92 |
| D | 484.21 ± 10.18 | 464.15 ± 11.41 |
| D + E | 390.71 ± 47.74 | 228.05 ± 11.95f |
Abbreviations: HC, healthy control; HC+E, healthy control treated with the extract; D, untreated diabetic; D + E, diabetic treated with the extract.
aValues are presented as mean ± SD.
bn = 6 in each group.
cOne-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was followed by a Tukey test.
dDiabetics rats treated with the extract were then compared to the results in the untreated diabetic rats.
fp < 0.05.
| Group, N = 6 | Serum Lipid Profiles, mg/dL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | LDL | HDL | TC | |
| HC | 87.05 ± 11.04 | 85.67 ± 8.47 | 47.15 ± 7.53 | 117.40 ± 14.18 |
| HC + E | 78.83 ± 7.54 | 80.17 ± 9.36 | 48.67 ± 6.12 | 91.10 ± 10.45 |
| D | 156.06 ± 11.73 | 160.67 ± 45.61 | 22.33 ± 6.65 | 198.57 ± 15.42 |
| D + E | 118.67 ± 16.69f | 128.83 ± 6.24f | 34.00 ± 11.43f | 152.83 ± 6.61f |
Abbreviations: HC, healthy control; HC + E, healthy control treated with the extract; D, untreated diabetic; and D + E, diabetic treated with the extract.
aValues are presented as mean ± SD.
bn = 6 in each group.
cA one-way ANOVA was followed by a Tukey test.
dDiabetic rats treated with the extract were compared to the other groups.
fP < 0.05.
4.2. Liver and Kidney Biomarkers
| Liver Biomarkers | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group, N = 6 | AST, IU/L | ALT , IU/L | Albumin, gr/dL | Total Bilirubin, mg/dL | Conjugated Bilirubin, mg/dL |
| HC | 120.67 ± 14.63 | 78.00 ± 11.90 | 6.50 ± 0.99 | 0.317 ± 0.17 | 0.171 ± 0.026 |
| HC+E | 139.17 ± 14.03 | 80.50 ± 13.83 | 8.20± 0.94 | 0.267 ± 0.12 | 0.263 ± 0.040 |
| D | 241.83 ± 18.53 | 173.05 ± 19.29 | 5.16 ± 2.11 | 1.317 ± 0.39 | 0.573 ± 0.051 |
| D+E | 189.00 ± 12.13f | 122.05 ± 5.36f | 5.56 ± 2.03f | 0.717 ± 0.22f | 0.330 ± 0.063f |
Abbreviations: HC, healthy control; HC + E, healthy control treated with the extract; D, untreated diabetic; and D + E, diabetic treated with the extract.
aValues are presented as mean ± SD.
bn = 6 in each group.
cA one-way ANOVA was followed by a Tukey test.
dDiabetic rats treated with the extract were compared to the other groups.
fP < 0.05.
Abbreviations: HC, healthy control; HC + E, healthy control treated with the extract; D, untreated diabetic; and D + E, diabetic treated with the extract.
aValues are presented as mean ± SD.
bn = 6 in each group.
cA one-way ANOVA was followed by a Tukey test.
dDiabetic rats treated with the extract were compared to the other groups.
fP < 0.05.
4.3. Histopathological Findings
A, healthy control; B, healthy control treated with extract; C, untreated diabetic; D, diabetic treated with extract. Liver of controls (untreated and treated with extract) shows no histopathological changes. The liver of an untreated diabetic shows a loss of cell arrangement and dilatation of the sinusoids (arrows), but liver in diabetics treated with hydro-alcoholic extract shows amelioration in the histological structure (H and E ×300).
A, healthys control; B, healthy controls treated with extract; C, untreated diabetic; D, diabetic treated with the extract. Tubules and glomeruli were normal in control rats (untreated and treated with hydro-alcoholic extract). The kidney of diabetic rats represents degenerated glomeruli and reduced urinary space (arrows), but these changes were ameliorated in the diabetic rats treated with hydro-alcoholic extract (H and E X300).


