Neutrophilic dermatoses comprise a heterogeneous group of inflammatory skin disorders that are histologically characterized by sterile neutrophilic infiltration. Variations in the distribution of this infiltrate, together with clinical morphology and disease course, help differentiate the entities within this group. The spectrum of neutrophilic dermatoses includes Sweet’s syndrome, pyoderma gangrenosum, Behçet syndrome, and neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis (
1).
Sweet’s syndrome, also referred to as acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is a prototype condition characterized by the sudden appearance of tender erythematous plaques, often accompanied by fever, arthralgia, and systemic features. First described in 1964, it shows a female predominance, with a ratio of approximately 4:1, and is most frequently observed in individuals aged 30 - 50 years (
2). Based on etiology, it has been categorized into idiopathic, inflammatory, malignancy-associated, and pregnancy-related forms, with drug-induced cases reported less commonly (
3).
Although the classic presentation includes erythematous plaques or nodules, several atypical morphological variants have been documented, including bullous, subcutaneous, pustular, erythema multiforme-like, and cellulitis-like forms. The bullous variant, in particular, is often associated with malignancy and may occur as a paraneoplastic manifestation in patients with known or occult neoplasms (
4). Previous reports have described classic Sweet’s syndrome in association with diabetes mellitus (
5); however, it has not been described as a direct diagnostic sign of diabetes. In contrast, this case highlights a bullous variant occurring in the setting of previously undiagnosed metabolic syndrome, with lesions confined to the lower legs, an unusual localization compared with the typically widespread distribution.
The novelty of this case lies in the atypical bullous morphology and distribution restricted to the lower legs, together with underlying metabolic syndrome. However, a bullous variant of Sweet’s syndrome localized to the palms and soles has previously been documented in association with a hematological malignancy (
6).
Histopathological examination in bullous Sweet’s syndrome typically demonstrates a dense neutrophilic infiltrate within the dermis, accompanied by papillary dermal edema, leukocytoclasia, and subepidermal bulla formation, without evidence of true vasculitis (
7), consistent with the findings in this patient.
The clinical differential diagnoses of bullous Sweet’s syndrome include bullous erythema multiforme, vasculitis, bullous erythema nodosum leprosum, autoimmune vesiculobullous disorders such as pretibial bullous pemphigoid, bullous pyoderma gangrenosum, irritant contact dermatitis, and bullous fixed drug eruption. Bullous erythema multiforme was ruled out because of the absence of classic target lesions and mucosal involvement, and the lack of basal cell vacuolation on histopathology. Histopathological examination did not reveal fibrinoid necrosis of vessel walls or significant vascular damage; therefore, cutaneous vasculitis was considered unlikely. There were no granulomas, lymphocytes, foamy histiocytes, acid-fast bacilli, or dermal perineural infiltrates to support erythema nodosum leprosum. Autoimmune vesiculobullous disorders, particularly bullous pemphigoid, were considered unlikely because of the absence of significant pruritus and the presence of dense dermal and perivascular neutrophilic infiltrates, together with neutrophilia on the peripheral blood smear. Bullous pyoderma gangrenosum was considered less likely because of the absence of typical undermined ulcers with violaceous borders. Bullous fixed drug eruption was excluded because of the absence of a clear drug trigger and site-specific recurrence. Histopathological examination did not reveal interface changes or necrotic keratinocytes. Although DIF could have further strengthened the diagnosis, it could not be performed. Nevertheless, the findings supported the diagnosis of bullous Sweet’s syndrome.
Su and Liu proposed diagnostic criteria consisting of 2 major and 4 minor components (
8). In the present case, the patient fulfilled both major criteria: painful erythematous plaques with vesiculation and histopathological evidence of a dense dermal neutrophilic infiltrate without leukocytoclastic vasculitis. In addition, 3 of 4 minor criteria were satisfied: leukocytosis exceeding 8000 cells/µL with neutrophilia greater than 70%, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and a favorable response to systemic corticosteroids, supporting the diagnosis of Sweet’s syndrome.
The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was established based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) guidelines (
9). The patient met 3 of the 5 required parameters, including increased waist circumference (110 cm), elevated triglyceride levels (170 mg/dL), and elevated fasting blood glucose (> 100 mg/dL).
Systemic corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy for Sweet’s syndrome, with prednisolone administered at a dose of 0.5 - 1.5 mg/kg/day, followed by gradual tapering over 2 - 4 weeks. The usefulness of steroid-sparing anti-inflammatory drugs in complicated cases is well recognized (
2). This case, with uncontrolled diabetes and dyslipidemia, highlights a scenario in which corticosteroids, although effective, could not be continued long term because of their potential adverse effects, particularly metabolic derangements. In such circumstances, alternative anti-inflammatory agents play a crucial role in maintaining disease control and achieving a favorable clinical outcome. In cases of localized disease, topical or intralesional corticosteroids may be considered (
10). Recent case reports have described alternative therapeutic agents, including thalidomide, pentoxifylline, dapsone, potassium iodide, colchicine, and minocycline. Immunosuppressive agents such as colchicine, dapsone, and methotrexate may also be used as steroid-sparing therapies, particularly in patients who do not tolerate corticosteroids well or in whom corticosteroid therapy alone is insufficient (
2).
The usual duration of treatment ranges from 2 to 6 weeks, beginning with higher doses of systemic corticosteroids followed by gradual tapering to minimize the risk of recurrence. In certain cases, extended maintenance therapy with low-dose corticosteroids or steroid-sparing agents, such as colchicine, dapsone, or thalidomide, may be required for an additional 4 - 8 weeks to sustain remission, as in this patient (
2).
3.1. Patient Perspective
The patient expressed concern regarding the diagnosis. However, following treatment, she experienced significant improvement in her symptoms and was satisfied with the overall outcome. She was also relieved to learn that her skin disease had led to the detection and subsequent management of previously undiagnosed metabolic derangements.