Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences
Effect of intranasal midazolam with/without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) in 3‒6-year-old uncooperative dental patients
Authors
Abstract
Introduction: Due to incomplete development of coping skills in children, they usually cannot cope with stressful situations like dental appointments. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of intranasal midazolam with/without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) in children with high levels of dental anxiety.
Materials and Methods: This crossover double-blinded clinical trial was conducted on 14 uncooperative children aged 3‒6, who required at least two similar dental treatment visits. Children were randomly sedated by the combination of intranasal midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and nasal drops of lidocaine hydrochloride (2%) with or without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) during each visit. Houpt’s scale for sedation was used to evaluate the patient`s behavior and efficacy of the sedation by an independent pediatric dentist.
Results: The combination of midazolam and inhalation sedation was significantly more effective in overall behavior after 15 minutes and at the end of the treatment (P<0.05), but not at the time of onset and discharge (P>0.05).
Conclusion: To manage the behavior of the children with high levels of dental anxiety, the combination of inhalation sedation with intranasal midazolam can be efficiently used.
Highlights
Copyright
© 2022, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup
Salem K, Khoshrang H, Kousha M, Hoseini M, Ranjbar M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup. Inn J Pediatr. 2015;25(3):-. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.25(3)2015.494
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation
Oriby ME. Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation. Anesth Pain Med. 2019;9(1):e85227. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.85227
Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety
Ahmadi R, Tavassoli-Hojjati S, Mehran M, Haghgoo R, Tohid-Rahbari M. Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety. Inn J Pediatr. 2014;24(2):. doi:
Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children
Beirami F, Khoshfetrat M, Babaiyan S, Ansari-Moghadam A. Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2016;18(5):e6671. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-6671
Comparison of Oral Melatonin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment
Faghihian R, Eshghi A, Faghihian H, Kaviani N. Comparison of Oral Melatonin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(2):e64236. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.64236
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 0 months ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 0 months ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 0 months ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 3 hours ago
- OpenAlex: 0
Last Update: 7 hours ago
- OpenCitations: 0
Last Update: 4 days ago