Cover image of the article: Effect of intranasal midazolam with/without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) in 3‒6-year-old uncooperative dental patients

Image Credit:Koomesh

Effect of intranasal midazolam with/without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) in 3‒6-year-old uncooperative dental patients

Authors

Nahid Askarizadeh1, Fereshteh Dehghan2, Yasaman Rezvani3,*, Leila EftekharLeila Eftekhar ORCID4, Seyed Mohammad Mireskandari5, Mona Naghibi6
1Depat. of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Tehran, Iran
3Depat. of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Depat. of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
5- Anesthesiology department, Tehran University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
6- Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Depat. of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Email: 7117-3@author.com

Koomesh:Vol. 24, issue 5; e154105
Published online:Sep 24, 2022
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Askarizadeh N, Dehghan F, Rezvani Y, Eftekhar L, Mireskandari SM, et al. Effect of intranasal midazolam with/without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) in 3‒6-year-old uncooperative dental patients. koomesh. 2022;24(5):e154105. doi:

Abstract

Introduction: Due to incomplete development of coping skills in children, they usually cannot cope with stressful situations like dental appointments. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of intranasal midazolam with/without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) in children with high levels of dental anxiety.
Materials and Methods: This crossover double-blinded clinical trial was conducted on 14 uncooperative children aged 3‒6, who required at least two similar dental treatment visits. Children were randomly sedated by the combination of intranasal midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and nasal drops of lidocaine hydrochloride (2%) with or without inhalation sedation (N2O/O2) during each visit. Houpt’s scale for sedation was used to evaluate the patient`s behavior and efficacy of the sedation by an independent pediatric dentist.
Results: The combination of midazolam and inhalation sedation was significantly more effective in overall behavior after 15 minutes and at the end of the treatment (P<0.05), but not at the time of onset and discharge (P>0.05).
Conclusion: To manage the behavior of the children with high levels of dental anxiety, the combination of inhalation sedation with intranasal midazolam can be efficiently used.

Highlights

Copyright

© 2022, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

27
Jun
2015
Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup

Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup

Katayoun Salem,
Hossein Khoshrang,
Maryam Kousha,
Mahboobeh Hoseini,
Marzieh Ranjbar,
Shadi Baniasadi
,et al.

Salem K, Khoshrang H, Kousha M, Hoseini M, Ranjbar M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup. Inn J Pediatr. 2015;25(3):-. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.25(3)2015.494

6
Feb
2019
Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation

Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation

Mohamed E Oriby

Oriby ME. Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Ketamine Versus Intranasal Midazolam Premedication for Children Undergoing Dental Rehabilitation. Anesth Pain Med. 2019;9(1):e85227. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.85227

1
Apr
2014
Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety

Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety

Rahil Ahmadi,
Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati,
Majid Mehran,
Roza Haghgoo,
Monireh Tohid-Rahbari

Ahmadi R, Tavassoli-Hojjati S, Mehran M, Haghgoo R, Tohid-Rahbari M. Comparison of Oral and Buccal Midazolam for Pediatric Dental Sedation: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial for Efficacy, Acceptance and Safety. Inn J Pediatr. 2014;24(2):. doi:

15
May
2016
Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children

Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children

Faranak Beirami,
Masoum Khoshfetrat,
Saeede Babaiyan,
Alireza Ansari-Moghadam

Beirami F, Khoshfetrat M, Babaiyan S, Ansari-Moghadam A. Efficacy of Different Doses of Oral Midazolam for Pre Operation Sedation of Children. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2016;18(5):e6671. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-6671

16
Apr
2018
Comparison of Oral Melatonin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment

Comparison of Oral Melatonin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment

Reyhaneh Faghihian,
Alireza Eshghi,
Hessamoddin Faghihian,
Nasser Kaviani

Faghihian R, Eshghi A, Faghihian H, Kaviani N. Comparison of Oral Melatonin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(2):e64236. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.64236

More by these authors

Nahid AskarizadehPubMedScholar
Fereshteh DehghanPubMedScholar
Yasaman RezvaniPubMedScholar
Leila EftekharPubMedScholar
Seyed Mohammad MireskandariPubMedScholar
Mona NaghibiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics
Indexed in