The Shortcomings of H-Index and Its Alternatives in Scientometrics: A Review Study

References

• 1.
  Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics. 2009;3(4):273-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
• 2.
  Bihari A, Tripathi S, Deepak A. A review on h-index and its alternative indices. J Inform Sci. 2021;49(3):624-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515211014478.
• 3.
  Memisevic H, Taljic I, Hadziomerovic AM. Making Use of H-index: the Shape of Science at the University of Sarajevo. Acta Inform Med. 2017;25(3):1187-90. [PubMed ID:29114112 ]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC5639886]. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2017.25.187-190.
• 4.
  Meho LI. The rise and rise of citation analysis. Physics World. 2007;20(1):32.
• 5.
  Fowler JH, Aksnes DW. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics. 2007;72(3):427-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2.
• 6.
  Van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, Moed HF, Nederhof TJ, Van Raan AFJ. The Holy Grail of science policy: Exploring and combining bibliometric tools in search of scientific excellence. Scientometrics. 2003;57(2):257-80. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024141819302.
• 7.
  Lane J. Let's make science metrics more scientific. Nature. 2010;464(7288):488-9. [PubMed ID:20336116]. https://doi.org/10.1038/464488a.
• 8.
  Costas R, Bordons M. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. J Inform. 2007;1(3):193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001.
• 9.
  Sabouri Ghannad M, Valinejadi A, Ghonsooly B, Mohammadhassanzadeh H. Evaluation of Iranian Scientists Productions in Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology based on ISI through 2000 to 2008. Int J Inform Sci Manag (IJISM). 2012;10(2):43-55.
• 10.
  Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16569-72. [PubMed ID:16275915]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC1283832]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
• 11.
  Dunnick NR. The H Index in Perspective. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(2):117-8. [PubMed ID:28089073]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.016.
• 12.
  Costas R, Franssen T. Reflections around 'the cautionary use' of the h-index: response to Teixeira da Silva and Dobranszki. Scientometrics. 2018;115(2):1125-30. [PubMed ID:29628537]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC5880859]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2683-0.
• 13.
  Romanovsky AA. Revised h index for biomedical research. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(22):4118-21. [PubMed ID:22983124]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC3524206]. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.22179.
• 14.
  Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists. Nature. 2005;436(7053):900. [PubMed ID:16107806]. https://doi.org/10.1038/436900a.
• 15.
  Huang M-h, Chi P-s. A comparative analysis of the application of h-index, g-index, and a-index in institutional-level research evaluation. J Library Inform Stud. 2010;8(2):1-10.
• 16.
  Rousseau R. The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index. J Inform. 2007;1(1):2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.05.001.
• 17.
  Franceschini F, Maisano DA. Analysis of the Hirsch index’s operational properties. Europ J Operat Res. 2010;203(2):494-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.001.
• 18.
  Guns R, Rousseau R. Simulating growth of the h‐index. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2008;60(2):410-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20973.
• 19.
  Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2008;59(5):830-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806.
• 20.
  Waltman L, van Eck NJ. The inconsistency of the h‐index. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2011;63(2):406-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21678.
• 21.
  Kreiner G. The Slavery of the h-index-Measuring the Unmeasurable. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:556. [PubMed ID:27853429]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC5089989]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00556.
• 22.
  Hu J, Gholami A, Stone N, Bartoszko J, Thoma A. An Evaluation of h-Index as a Measure of Research Productivity Among Canadian Academic Plastic Surgeons. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2018;26(1):5-10. [PubMed ID:29619353]. [PubMed Central ID:PMC5871118]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550317749508.
• 23.
  Costas R, Bordons M. Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics. 2008;77(2):267-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0.
• 24.
  Zhivotovsky LA, Krutovsky KV. Self-citation can inflate h-index. Scientometrics. 2008;77(2):373-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-1716-2.
• 25.
  Glänzel W, Persson O. H-index for Price medalists. ISSI newsletter. 2005;1(4):15-8.
• 26.
  Weingart P. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics. 2005;62(1):117-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7.
• 27.
  Tunç M. Adaptation of Hirsh Index (H-Index) Indicator in Sociometric Analyses. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi. 2014;3(29):425-40.
• 28.
  Vinkler P. Eminence of scientists in the light of the h-index and other scientometric indicators. J Inform Sci. 2007;33(4):481-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506072165.
• 29.
  Demaine J. h-index and Related Measures - Part 2: Variants and Extension of the h-index. Vienna: European summer school for scientometrics. 2011.
• 30.
  Maabreh M, Alsmadi IM. A Survey of Impact and Citation Indices: Limitations and Issues. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2012;40(2):35-54.