The results of this study showed that after discharge, all the three follow-up methods, including texting, telephone education, and educational booklet, improved self-care ability in patients with ACS. Meanwhile, texting appeared to be more effective than the other two methods. Several studies have reported similar results. Moradi et al. (
35) observed that SMS follow-up could enhance the lifestyle of patients with ACS. Studying patients with ACS, Chow et al. (
36) also found that text messaging was effective in raising medication adherence and secondary prevention. Passaglia et al. (
37) proposed that text messaging was effective in enhancing and controlling the risk factors in patients with ACS. Herring et al. (
38) confirmed the effect of SMS-based training on the physical activity of CHD patients. Also, in keeping with the present study, Safaie et al. (
39) suggested that texting could help promote adherence to treatment regimens among hypertensive patients.
Education and treatment follow-up have also been investigated in the case of other diseases, and the results are generally in good agreement with the present study. In this regard, Goodarzi et al. (
40) supported the impact of SMS-based training on the knowledge and awareness of male patients with type 2 diabetes. Hovadick et al. (
41) found that SMS-based follow-up could boost self-care in patients with type 2 diabetes. In a 2017 study by Abaza and Marschollek (
42), educating diabetic patients through texting could ameliorate their health and self-management skills.
In the present study, the telephone follow-up, although not as effective as SMS-based follow-up, outperformed educational booklets in increasing the self-care ability of patients. In the same vein, Kamrani et al. (
43) addressed the impact of training and telenursing via telephone follow-ups on diet compliance in patients with ACS, and they highlighted the positive outcome of their intervention. O’Neil et al. (
44) reported the positive impact of telephone follow-ups on the quality of life of anxious patients after myocardial infarction. Shojaee et al. (
5) observed that education and telephone follow-ups by nurses raised hope in patients with heart failure. Najafi et al. (
6) noted that telephone follow-ups increased medication and dietary adherence in MI patients. Exploring the effect of telephone follow-ups on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes, Lashkari et al. (
45) concluded that their intervention could help better control blood glucose and maintain a more favorable BMI.
All of the above reports are consistent with the present study. On the other hand, some studies have reached opposite conclusions. For instance, Holst et al. (
46) probed the effect of telephone follow-ups on the self-care status of patients with heart failure, but they found no improvement in the quality of life of the subjects, which was explained on account of the low number of phone calls or insufficient training. More recently, Jalali et al. (
47) compared the effects of three follow-up methods (SMS, telephone, and routine) on the quality of life of patients with heart failure; the results showed that the quality of life score varied dramatically before and after the intervention in the SMS and regular groups, but this difference was not significant in the telephone group, which is not consistent with the present study.
The effectiveness of telephone follow-ups could be impaired by several factors, including mental status, physical condition, occupational concerns, psychological problems, and the oral manner of delivering instructions. The lowest score of self-care achieved in the case of booklet-based follow-up could be justified if one considers that Iranians are not avid readers, booklets are not available everywhere, and patients using this approach were not daily reminded to review the materials. Conversely, SMS-based follow-up, in addition to reminding subjects of their tasks daily, provided the opportunity to review the messages at appropriate time and place as needed to act according to the recommendations.
The level of education exerts a positive effect on one’s knowledge and performance. Although the subjects in the current study were randomly divided into three groups, the level of education was higher in the SMS group than in the other two groups. This difference was statistically significant, which could have affected the results. Another limitation of the present study concerns participants’ variations in terms of personal characteristics, physical status, mental state when answering questions, previous hospitalization experience, and motivation/interest.
5.1. Conclusions
Although any kind of follow-up after discharge could more or less amplify the self-care capacity of patients with ACS, the SMS-based follow-up showed to be more effective in this study. The results of this study can be used to boost the self-care ability of patients with other chronic diseases, as well. It is suggested that health centers integrate short texting service in their follow-up programs for patients with chronic diseases.