A large body of evidence indicates that electrophysiological and structural remodeling of the atria plays an important role in the development and perpetuation of AF. Several studies suggested that oxidative stress and inflammation seemed to be involved in the pathophysiology of AF. However, whether these processes are the cause or consequence of AF remains to be determined (
14,
15).
In particular, CRP and other inflammatory markers appear to be related to left atrial enlargement, AF persistence, future AF development, and recurrence after cardioversion. One study showed that elevated concentrations of interleukin-6 and CRP were associated with higher uric acid levels (
14). Recently, two small studies also reported an association between AF and serum uric acid levels. One study compared serum uric acid levels in 86 patients with paroxysmal and permanent AF with those of 48 control subjects (
14). That study demonstrated stepwise increases in serum uric acid in those with a higher AF burden. It also reported that serum uric acid was positively correlated with the LA diameter.
A recent study showed that uric acid had a direct effect on endothelial dysfunction and smooth muscle cell proliferation (
16). Another indicated that the serum uric acid level was closely associated with elevated levels of some inflammatory markers, such as CRP (
17). Although increases in uric acid may be attributed to various pathological conditions associated with AF, multiple risk factors for AF have been identified. These include chronic renal failure, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases.
In hypertension, because of the decrease in renal blood flow, which stimulates urate reabsorption, the level of serum uric acid is frequently increased. On the other hand, in chronic kidney disease, uric acid increases because of the decrease in renal urate excretion. In the present study, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the following parameters: gender, age, diabetes, and hypertension. Whether the elevated uric acid level found in the present study was a cause or a consequence of AF remains unclear, as this was a cross-sectional study. To shed light on this issue, the results should be confirmed in prospective cohort studies.
A previous study used the uricase-peroxidase method to measure the serum uric acid levels of individuals at baseline (
18). The study population consisted of 15,382 initially AF-free men and women aged 45 - 64, who were participants in the ARIC study, which followed up patients from 1987 to 2004. AF was ascertained using hospital records and electrocardiograms performed during follow-up. The unadjusted incidence of AF increased from three per 1000 person-years in the first quartile of serum uric acid to eight per 1000 person-years in quartile 4 of serum uric acid. Cox proportional models were adjusted simultaneously for age, sex, race, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum glucose, body mass index, LDL, prevalent coronary heart disease and heart failure, creatinine, use of diuretics, and the p wave duration on the ECG at baseline. When compared to subjects in the lowest quartile, the hazard ratio of AF for subjects in the highest quartile of serum uric acid was 1.38 (95% CI 1.07 - 1.80).
In the present study, we reported an independent association between increased levels of uric acid and AF. However, some potential limitations should be considered. First, oxidative stress markers were not assessed. Second, patients with paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF were not analyzed separately. Third, as this was a cross-sectional study, it remains unclear whether the elevation in the uric acid level was a cause or consequence of AF. Further larger studies, with a long-term follow-up are needed to elucidate the exact pathophysiological and prognostic role of uric acid levels in this setting. Further studies are also needed to shed light on the role of uric acid-lowering agents as upstream therapy in AF.