According to the study results, individuals with SCI obtained half of the total score of the physical dimension of HRQoL and that they had a higher mean score on the psychological dimension of HRQoL than on the physical dimension. It seemed that SCI has more impact on the physical dimension of the HRQoL of patients in Iran. This finding of our study is consistent with the results of a study by Edwards et al. in Canada (
29). In a study conducted in Quebec, Canada, people with paraplegia had a higher mean score on the physical dimension of HRQoL than on the mental dimension (
30). Considering that patients with SCI are vulnerable to various physical complications, such as cardiovascular disease, bladder and bowel dysfunction, pain syndrome, pressure ulcers, osteoporosis, and bone fractures (
31), it is expected that they experience more reduction in their physical HRQoL. Other studies have supported the current study findings that people with SCI have low levels of HRQoL (
12-
14). Consistent with the findings of the present study, Barker et al. found that the HRQoL of people with SCI was lower than that of the general population (
7). The findings from two other studies in Sweden and the United States emphasized that the HRQoL of patients with SCI was lower than that of the general population (
14,
32). Physical functioning shows the ability to perform physical tasks independently or semi-independently. Stevens et al. found that physical activity was the best predictor of HRQoL among people with SCI that could alone predict half of the variance of HRQoL in this population (
33).
According to the study results, the lowest HRQoL scores belonged to the physical functioning subscale. In line with the results of the present study, a study conducted in Canada indicated that patients with SCI had low scores on the HRQoL dimensions of physical role limitation and physical functioning (
30). In a study ob SCI patients in Norway, the lowest HRQoL scores were on the physical functioning subscale. In a study by Lidal et al., those who had chronic SCI for more than 20 years had lower scores on three physical HRQoL subscales (physical functioning, physical pain, and general health) and the vitality subscale than the general population (
12). Forchheimer et al.’s study results support our finding that the lowest score belonged to the physical function dimension (
34).
Comparison of mean scores on the HRQoL subscales in the tetraplegia and paraplegia groups indicated that the mean score of all eight HRQoL subscales (except for social functioning) was higher in the paraplegia group than in the tetraplegia group. Higher scores of people with paraplegia on the physical functioning subscale can be attributed to certain aspects of the Iranian culture, including being affectionate and high levels of support for patients from their friends and relatives. In the study by Lidal et al. (
12), people with paraplegia scored lower on the HRQoL subscales of physical role limitation, physical pain, and mental role limitation than those with tetraplegia. Consistent with part of the study results, Gurcay et al. (
13) found that those with paraplegia scored higher than those with tetraplegia on the HRQoL subscales of physical functioning, physical role limitation, social functioning, and emotional role limitation. This difference can be attributed to the specific culture and social context of societies in which the studies were conducted. Contrary to the studies mentioned, the results of Westgren and Levi’s study showed that there was no difference in the mean score of any dimension of quality of life between the two groups (
14). The meta-regression results indicated a relationship between the articles’ year of publication and SCI patients’ mean score on the mental dimension of HRQoL; that is, with an increase in the articles’ year of publication, the mean score of the mental dimension of HRQoL also increased. This can be due to the patients’ increased level of awareness, medical advances, and the use of advanced medical devices.
One of the limitations of this study was that some selected studies did not provide enough information, especially in the description of demographic variables; therefore, we could not examine some of the demographic information regarding HRQoL. Since we focused only on studies that used SF-36, we did not analyze studies with other tools. Therefore, it was not possible to compare the results of this study with studies using other tools. The present study is novel in its efforts to mix the results of several previous studies and report an overall result; this can be regarded as one of its advantages that make its findings useful for healthcare policymakers in proving high-quality care for patients with SCI.