This study involved a simple review. Descriptive, analytical, and intervention articles indexed in SID, Noormags, Scopus, Iranmedex, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and grey literature and consulted experts. All the search results were exported to EndNote (version X7, for Windows, Thomson Reuters, Toronto, Canada), where duplicates were removed.
All the reviewers convened to discuss discrepancies between reviewers. Following this, full-text versions of studies that were deemed to be potentially eligible for the review were obtained, and two reviewers independently evaluated each paper. In cases of doubt, the full text was subjected to adjudication by a third researcher on the team (the process involves having a third researcher on the team to make a final decision).
The keywords used to search for related articles since 1996 were “spiritual,” “spiritual health,” “religion,” “therapies,” “cognitive behavior,” “cognitive behavior,” “technique,” “therapy,” “extramarital relationship,” “extramarital sex behavior,” “infidelity,” “adultery,” “unfaithfulness,” “marital infidelity and women.”
We focused on studies that employed extramarital relationships among women, including only studies on heterosexual married couples, as well as studies on the use of spirituality/religion and CBT as coping techniques in EMI therapy.
The inclusion criteria for the articles were descriptive, analytical, and intervention articles from 1996 to date in Persian or English, available in full text, and providing information related to the searched keywords. The exclusion criteria were articles with no full text or in which the implementation was not well-defined. After excluding the articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria or met the exclusion criteria, the full text of all eligible articles was prepared and discussed in this review.