Current strategies for managing acute ischemic stroke play a key role in the diagnosis of patients so that they can benefit from reperfusion therapies. Given the time-sensitive nature of thrombolytic treatments and the limited early sensitivity of NCCT, it is common to administer thrombolytics even when NCCT results are unremarkable (
23,
24). Studies indicate that up to 20% of patients initially diagnosed with stroke are later identified as having stroke mimics, many of whom receive unnecessary thrombolytic therapy. The higher sensitivity of DWI during the early stages of ischemia not only minimizes unnecessary thrombolytic administration but also supports the development of protocols requiring radiographic confirmation of ischemia before treatment (
1).
sing DWI MRI as the reference standard, NCCT correctly identified 45 of 53 positive cases (sensitivity 84.9%) and 24 of 31 negative cases (specificity 77.4%). Overall, 69 of 84 cases were accurately classified, reflecting the diagnostic performance of NCCT compared with DWI MRI. These findings are consistent with prior comparative work and support the interpretation of our observed diagnostic performance in the hyperacute window. The superior sensitivity is attributable to its ability to detect restricted water diffusion in ischemic tissues, a hallmark of acute ischemia, which manifests within minutes of stroke onset. This rapid detection is critical for initiating timely therapeutic interventions, such as thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy (
24).
The NCCT’s inability to accurately measure ischemic volume in the early stages of stroke often results in low inter-rater reliability, particularly among less experienced clinicians who frequently make therapeutic decisions (
25). Conversely, DWI’s superior ability to delineate infarct size, even early in the disease process, has the potential to enhance stroke volume assessment and reduce hemorrhagic complications, although this benefit remains theoretical. Additionally, DWI can differentiate the age of infarcts and reveal multiple ischemic areas in up to 17% of acute stroke cases, a finding that correlates with an elevated risk of hemorrhagic transformation when thrombolytic therapy is used (
26).
Interestingly, specificity was relatively comparable between the two modalities, with DWI achieving 92.1% and NCCT achieving 90.3%. This finding indicates that while NCCT is less sensitive, it remains a reliable tool for ruling out non-ischemic causes, such as ICH. Thus, NCCT retains value in the initial triage of stroke patients, particularly in settings where DWI is not immediately available (
27,
28).
A major strength of NCCT lies in its capacity to identify acute ICH, which constitutes an absolute contraindication to thrombolytic therapy. Although MRI was historically considered limited in detecting ICH, advances in imaging techniques—such as gradient-echo sequences, DWI, and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI)—have markedly enhanced its sensitivity for acute hemorrhage (
29). During ICH, hemoglobin transitions into the brain parenchyma, leading to red blood cell stagnation and reduced oxygenation, which alters the MRI signal. Studies have shown that MRI can detect ICH as early as 23 minutes after symptom onset, with findings visible on DWI and T2-weighted sequences within hours (
30-
32). Although additional studies are needed to confirm its standalone efficacy, MRI’s ability to exclude ICH and detect ischemic changes with DWI makes it a compelling alternative for stroke imaging (
33).
Concerns about MRI have historically included acquisition time, limited availability, higher costs, and challenges in imaging uncooperative or claustrophobic patients. However, advancements in echo-planar imaging have significantly reduced scan times, enabling the entire brain to be imaged in under two minutes (
34). Despite these improvements, the widespread adoption of MRI as the standard of care for acute stroke remains constrained by its cost and availability. A recent study demonstrated that 24/7 MRI access is feasible and offers diagnostic and therapeutic advantages, with improved efficiency over time. As MRI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, its role in acute stroke management is likely to expand (
35).
While DWI is invaluable for acute stroke imaging, other MRI modalities can also provide critical information within short acquisition times (
36). Combined with DWI, PWI can distinguish between irreversibly damaged tissue and salvageable ischemic penumbra, potentially guiding decisions about the risks and benefits of reperfusion therapy beyond the traditional six-hour treatment window (
37). Although computed tomography perfusion offers similar sensitivity to DWI and PWI, its limited brain coverage restricts its utility compared to MRI, which provides comprehensive cerebral imaging. Advances in imaging protocols and interventional radiology techniques will likely extend the therapeutic window for acute ischemic stroke, enhancing patient outcomes.
Our findings have profound implications for clinical workflows in stroke management. While NCCT remains indispensable for its widespread availability, cost-effectiveness, and ability to exclude hemorrhage, the incorporation of DWI into routine protocols could significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy. Hospitals equipped with advanced imaging capabilities should prioritize DWI for patients presenting within the hyperacute phase, especially when thrombolytic therapy is being considered (
38).
Despite its advantages, DWI is not without limitations. The reliance on high-field MRI scanners and the longer acquisition time compared to NCCT may pose logistical challenges in emergency settings. Additionally, contraindications to MRI, such as metallic implants or severe claustrophobia, may preclude its use in certain patients. Addressing these challenges will require continued investment in MRI accessibility and the development of faster imaging protocols. Future research should explore the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the diagnostic performance of both modalities. AI-driven algorithms could improve the sensitivity and specificity of NCCT by identifying subtle early ischemic changes with greater accuracy.
5.1. Limitation
This study has several limitations. It was conducted at a single center with a modest sample size (n = 84), which may limit generalizability. The sample size was based on consecutive patient enrollment during the study period rather than a formal diagnostic accuracy sample size calculation, which may limit statistical precision. Detailed NIHSS stratification and exact time-to-imaging intervals were not analyzed. External validation was not performed. Additionally, characterization of false-positive and false-negative cases was limited. These factors should be considered when interpreting the findings.
5.2. Conclusion
In this study, NCCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.9% and a specificity of 77.4% when compared with DWI MRI as the reference standard. These findings reinforce the higher sensitivity of DWI in detecting early ischemic stroke, particularly within the hyperacute phase (≤ 6 hours). Nevertheless, NCCT remains an essential first-line imaging modality due to its rapid availability and reliability in excluding ICH. Our results support the complementary role of DWI when accessible, rather than advocating replacement of NCCT in routine emergency settings. Given the single-center design and modest sample size, larger multicenter studies are necessary to further validate these findings before influencing clinical imaging guidelines.