This study assessed the diagnostic performance of attenuation measurements from TNC and VNC images obtained using PCD-CT for anemia detection in AIS patients. Among the evaluated anatomical regions, attenuation values measured in the VCM on native TNC images showed the strongest correlation with serum hemoglobin levels. In vessel-matched intracranial comparisons, TNC consistently outperformed the corresponding VNC reconstructions. To our knowledge, no prior study has evaluated both true non-contrast and virtual non-contrast venous attenuation markers for anemia detection in AIS patients on the same PCD-CT platform. Accordingly, the results should be interpreted as two complementary but methodologically distinct analyses: a vessel-matched intracranial TNC-versus-VNC comparison and a separate pragmatic, workflow-oriented comparison using the best-performing extracranial VNC marker. In this pragmatic comparison, attenuation measurements in the internal jugular vein on VNC images demonstrated diagnostic performance similar to that of the best-performing TNC marker, namely the VCM. This jugular VNC marker was included because our prior CTA/VNC-based work identified the internal jugular veins as a reliable VNC measurement site for anemia assessment; however, in the present study, it served only as a pragmatic extracranial comparator, whereas the primary TNC-versus-VNC comparison was restricted to intracranial venous structures available on both acquisitions.
The capability of VNC images derived from CTA datasets to detect anemia has been previously established in thoracic and abdominal imaging contexts (
14-
16). However, such assessments in neuroimaging settings are limited. This study expands the current understanding by indicating that extracranial structures such as the internal jugular vein may provide diagnostic performance comparable to intracranial venous measurements (VCM), potentially benefiting from fewer artifacts caused by adjacent bony structures and easier practical access in routine clinical settings (
14,
19). However, it should be noted that reconstruction settings were not identical between datasets: TNC images were reconstructed using kernel Hr40 with QIR level 2, whereas VNC images were derived from CTA datasets reconstructed with kernel Qr40f and QIR level 3. These differences may have influenced image texture, noise properties, and attenuation stability and should be considered when interpreting direct comparisons between TNC and VNC measurements.
The present cohort partially overlaps with our previously published study on VNC-based anemia assessment in supra-aortic vessels (
23). However, the scientific objective differs substantially. While the prior work evaluated VNC attenuation measurements from CTA datasets, including intra- and extracranial vascular regions, the current study specifically addresses whether CTA-derived VNC measurements can approach the diagnostic performance of native cranial CT/TNC attenuation within intracranial venous structures available on both acquisitions. Thus, the present analysis is an incremental comparison between intracranial native TNC and VNC attenuation markers using hemoglobin-based anemia classification as the reference standard.
An important physiological confounder in attenuation-based anemia detection is the influence of acute hemodynamic variability on venous attenuation values. Prior work has demonstrated that venous HU measurements are not solely determined by hemoglobin concentration but are significantly affected by hydration status, renal function, inflammatory parameters, and intravascular volume shifts (
25). These effects are particularly relevant in the acute stroke setting, where patients frequently receive intravenous fluids, experience autonomic dysregulation, or present with cardiac comorbidities that alter venous return and intrathoracic pressures. This mechanism may partially explain why VNC-based jugular vein measurements, although showing similar diagnostic performance to native VCM attenuation in the pragmatic comparison, exhibit greater variance. Intracranial venous structures such as the VCM operate under more stable low-flow conditions and are less susceptible to rapid hemodynamic fluctuations, potentially contributing to their stronger correlation with hemoglobin on native imaging.
A key methodological limitation of our study is that the pragmatic comparison between native VCM attenuation and VNC-derived internal jugular vein attenuation does not isolate imaging modality from anatomical location. Accordingly, the observed similarity in diagnostic performance should be interpreted as a pragmatic comparison between the best-performing TNC and VNC markers rather than as proof of full equivalence between TNC and VNC technology. Because intracranial dural venous structures and extracranial neck veins differ in compliance, flow dynamics, and susceptibility to physiological variation, future studies should ideally include vessel-matched comparisons across modalities.
The finding of no statistically significant difference between VCM attenuation on native CT and jugular vein attenuation on VNC images might nevertheless be clinically meaningful. However, this comparison combines both imaging modality and anatomical-location effects: VCM-TNC represents an intracranial venous marker on true non-contrast imaging, whereas internal jugular vein VNC represents an extracranial venous marker derived from contrast-enhanced CTA. Therefore, similar AUC values should not be interpreted as evidence that VNC is generally equivalent to TNC or that VNC can broadly replace native imaging. Rather, the finding suggests that internal jugular vein VNC attenuation may provide a pragmatic anemia-screening marker in selected stroke workflows, provided that this approach is validated prospectively. The VCM-VNC threshold showed relatively high sensitivity but only moderate specificity, suggesting that this marker may be more suitable as a screening-oriented indicator than as a standalone diagnostic cutoff. This further supports the interpretation of the proposed VNC thresholds as exploratory and requiring prospective validation.
The equivalence between VNC and TNC is not uniform across anatomical regions. While extracranial veins benefit from larger ROI placement and reduced susceptibility to beam-hardening, they remain more vulnerable to contrast contamination and hemodynamic instability, which can attenuate correlation strength. These region-specific constraints indicate that the feasibility of using VNC as an alternative to TNC should not be generalized across all vascular territories. Instead, VNC appears most reliable in anatomical sites with low residual iodine content and stable venous flow conditions. Defining such region-specific criteria is essential before VNC can be broadly integrated into streamlined stroke protocols or mobile stroke unit workflows. Prospective validation will be required to determine whether hybrid or region-optimized VNC strategies can serve as an alternative to native scans without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
5.1. Limitations and Conclusions
Several further limitations should be acknowledged. First, the study’s relatively small sample size and single-center retrospective design limit generalizability. Although the main associations remained present after adjustment for age and sex, residual confounding cannot be excluded. Second, although most hemoglobin measurements were obtained close to CT acquisition, with 77.8% available within one calendar day, the study allowed a maximum interval of seven days between CT and laboratory testing. This temporal mismatch is a relevant limitation in acute stroke patients, in whom hemoglobin values may change because of dehydration, intravenous fluid administration, bleeding, or intercurrent clinical events. A sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with hemoglobin measurements within one calendar day showed broadly consistent diagnostic performance, particularly for VCM-TNC. Accordingly, the present findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
Nevertheless, the observed correlations and diagnostic performance support the potential clinical relevance of venous attenuation measurements. Future studies should aim to validate these findings in larger, multicenter prospective cohorts and explore additional factors influencing attenuation-based hemoglobin estimation, including hydration status, renal function, medications, and inflammatory status.