In this study of first-line antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated UTIs, the compliance rate with SPILF guidelines was 59.4%. This value is consistent with the results of previous studies on adherence to clinical guidelines (
11-
13). A French study evaluating the impact of a computerized decision support system on compliance found a markedly lower rate of 33% for empirical antibiotic prescriptions for UTIs (
14), whereas a single-center retrospective study of acute UTIs reported a value of 60% (
15). These differences suggest that ensuring appropriate antibiotic stewardship in the ED remains challenging.
In the literature, pharmacist-led interventions have been shown to improve prescription accuracy and guideline compliance. A study by Sofeso et al. demonstrated that pharmacist review of discharge antibiotics for UTIs in the ED was associated with a significant decrease in the proportion of inappropriate prescriptions, from 64.2% to 5%, thereby underscoring the importance of pharmacist involvement in optimizing antimicrobial therapy (
16). The main causes of noncompliance were an inappropriate duration in two-thirds of cases and prescription of an inappropriate first-line molecule or an incorrect dosing regimen in one-third of cases; this likely increased the risk of bacterial resistance or treatment failure (
16,
17). Poor guideline adherence may have been related to diagnostic uncertainty due to atypical presentations, a misleading clinical picture, or a reason for consultation that did not immediately suggest an infectious etiology.
In the male UTI group, 69.5% of prescriptions did not comply with the guidelines. This may be because male UTIs are often clinically complex and involve several pathogens; physicians may therefore prescribe broader-spectrum or empirical treatments. Moreover, the frequent noncompliant treatment durations in this group (32.6%) suggest a heightened perception of severity or a lack of standardization in the treatment strategy. These inappropriate practices might promote the development of antibiotic resistance and increase the occurrence of adverse effects.
In this study, 194 patients were initially treated with fluoroquinolones. Among these patients, 33, including 18 with APN, received a noncompliant prescription. This result might be due to 1) the predominance of male patients in the sample, possibly leading to a higher frequency of fluoroquinolone prescriptions; and/or 2) the influence of contextual factors, such as allergies and comorbidities, on physicians' clinical judgment. However, systematic prescription of fluoroquinolones as first-line treatment in noncomplicated cases may select resistant bacteria, representing a major public health issue (
18,
19). To limit inappropriate fluoroquinolone use and improve guideline compliance, prescribing practices in EDs should be assessed regularly.
Our results identified several risk factors for non-guideline-compliant antibiotic therapy in the ED. Notably, male sex, older age, and higher CCI were significantly associated with a greater likelihood of noncompliance. This finding corroborates published data emphasizing the impact of demographic and clinical factors on treatment adherence (
20). The presence of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiopathy further underscores the complexity of antibiotic stewardship in patients with two or more chronic conditions. Abnormal serum creatinine and urea levels suggest that impaired kidney function may contribute to deviations from guideline-adherent prescribing. This finding is consistent with studies on pharmacokinetic variability in older patients with multiple comorbidities (
21,
22). Furthermore, symptoms such as burning on urination and flank pain were associated with noncompliance; this might be due to misinterpretation of symptom severity or delays in appropriately adjusting antibiotic treatment.
Initial guideline adherence was inversely related to the need for antibiotic adjustment at 72 hours, highlighting the importance of early reassessment. The absence of advice on hygiene and dietary measures was a major factor in nonadherence and emphasized the need for patient education and a multidisciplinary approach. Follow-up review of urine cultures at 72 hours is essential to avoid unnecessary prolongation of antibiotic therapy (
23). The lack of documentation regarding continuation or discontinuation of treatment for 75% of sterile cultures in this study highlights the need to improve traceability and treatment follow-up.
Interestingly, the presence of Staphylococcus saprophyticus was significantly associated with noncompliance. This finding raises concerns about pathogen-specific treatment challenges and the need for accurate microbiological diagnosis to guide therapy. In contrast, our multivariate analysis indicated that a final diagnosis of cystitis was associated with higher compliance. Patient management is likely to be more straightforward for uncomplicated UTIs than for more complex conditions, such as prostatitis.
In the cystitis group, we identified only 23 patients at risk of developing complications. Interestingly, 151 patients underwent additional laboratory tests, including urine cultures and MEU. It can be hypothesized that patient pressure and/or easier access to resources in a hospital environment, compared with private practice, prompted physicians to prescribe these additional tests. Excessive prescription of bacteriological tests can reveal colonization and contamination that do not add value to patient management. Conversely, this information can lead to unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, with detrimental consequences for both individual and public health. These consequences include selection and spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria and exacerbation of adverse effects related to antibiotic therapy, such as
Clostridioides difficile infection. Excessive or repeated blood culture prescriptions have been shown to increase antibiotic prescribing (
24).
The bacterial ecology observed in this study was consistent with that reported in the literature.
Escherichia coli was the most frequently identified pathogen and accounted for 247 cases (76%), followed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae in 19 cases (6%),
Proteus mirabilis in 5 cases (2%), and
Staphylococcus saprophyticus in 28.9% of cases (
2,
25,
26).
The high level of antibiotic resistance observed in this study is notable: 58.1% of bacterial strains were resistant to at least one antibiotic.
Escherichia coli accounted for most of these instances (76%), with resistance to fluoroquinolones in 18 strains. Twelve
E. coli strains produced ESBLs. This resistance is concerning because it makes UTI treatment more difficult, especially for infections due to
E. coli, which remains the main pathogen in both community-acquired and nosocomial UTIs. These findings corroborate reports by Critchley et al. and Abbott et al. (2023) on the growing resistance of uropathogens to antibiotics (
27,
28). This phenomenon is primarily attributed to excessive antibiotic use and emphasizes the urgent need to restrict antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings. In light of this situation, prescribing practices should be revised, and antimicrobial resistance should be managed more strictly to limit the public health impact of this issue.
5.1. Strengths and Limitations
Our findings should be interpreted in light of the inherently context-dependent nature of antimicrobial stewardship. The originality of our work lies in the ED setting, where stewardship is particularly challenging because of time pressure, limited access to complete clinical and microbiological data, patient heterogeneity, and difficulties in ensuring follow-up. These constraints have been shown to contribute to suboptimal antibiotic prescribing, with large-scale studies reporting that more than one-quarter of antibiotic prescriptions in EDs may be inappropriate (
29). Continuous evaluation of prescribing practices is a key component of stewardship programs (
30), and current recommendations emphasize that empirical therapy should be guided by local epidemiology and resistance patterns. Local bacterial ecology remains a major determinant of antibiotic appropriateness and supports the need for context-specific assessments. The methodology used in our study could be readily reproduced in other centers to generate context-specific data and guide targeted interventions (
31). Finally, our results support recent evidence showing that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing remains frequent despite stewardship efforts (
32), highlighting the need for ongoing local assessments.
This study had several limitations. First, its single-center design means that the results cannot necessarily be generalized to other populations. Second, retrospective data collection from patient medical records may have missed important information, particularly given the lack of a computerized physician order entry system in our ED. In cases with missing data, antibiotic treatment was considered noncompliant. Finally, selection bias may have influenced the inclusion of the various nosological categories because only the clinical observations made by the ED physician were used to classify the different UTIs.
5.2. Conclusions
The results of this study highlighted persistent challenges in achieving guideline-adherent antibiotic use in the ED. The 59.4% compliance rate with SPILF guidelines indicates that substantial gaps in practice remain, particularly with regard to treatment duration and choice of molecule, thereby increasing the risk of antimicrobial resistance. The low compliance rate for male UTIs and APN, largely due to inappropriate treatment durations and unnecessary fluoroquinolone use, further underscores the need for stricter stewardship measures.
Reassessment of urine cultures at 72 hours is crucial but remains underused, and failure to reassess may lead to unnecessary prolongation of antibiotic treatment. Enhancing access to real-time antibiotic susceptibility testing, reinforcing multidisciplinary collaboration, and integrating pharmacists into the ED workflow might help reduce the proportion of inappropriate prescriptions. Strengthening these strategies would likely curb antimicrobial resistance and ensure safer and more effective management of UTIs.
Optimizing antibiotic use is no longer merely an option; it is an urgent necessity. Future interventions must focus on standardized prescribing, improved follow-up, and reduction of the public health burden caused by antimicrobial resistance.