Identifying the characteristic of uropathogens and antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance patterns play a crucial role to successfully treat and decide empiric treatment for the patients who are complaining of UTIs. Various studies have reported the nature and different rates of antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance patterns against uropathogens (
11,
12). Our main aim in the study was to investigate the overall prevalence and pathogens and comorbidities associated with UTIs, and also antibiotic sensitivity and resistance patterns to UTIs as well as to determine appropriate empirical antibiotics to treat UTIs in community and hospitalized patients. The prevalence of uropathogens that showed growth in the urine cultures was 14.5%. We studied a total of 2,845 patients, and females displayed a slight predominance in our research (51% of the total cases), which is consistent with other studies conducted in Ethiopia, India, and Saudi Arabia (
11-
13). This could be due to several predisposing factors specific to women (
14).
The most common prevailing uropathogen in both community- and hospital-acquired UTI in the current study was
E. coli in 63.4% of the cases (two-thirds), followed by
K. pneumonia (13.3%), and
P. aeruginosa (3.9%), which is comparable to the previous studies (
12,
13). The present study demonstrated the highest resistance rate to uropathogens by cefepime (100%), ampicillin (94.5%), cefuroxime 94.5%), cefazolin (88.7%), cefixime (83.3%), and ceftriaxone (82.4%), which is consistent with earlier studies conducted in Ethiopia and India (
11,
15). One of the significant findings of our study was that fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin in 67.7% and levofloxacin in 54.2%) indicated increasing resistance rate to common uropathogens that is a sorrowful finding to the world that can be due to the use of fluoroquinolones as over-the-counter drugs in mild infections before the initials medications. This resistance pattern was in contrast to most of the previous studies (
16,
17).
The study found the highest antimicrobial sensitivity rate (about 100%) against uropathogens in tigecycline, colimycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. Moreover, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, and amikacin also manifested a significant sensitivity rate ranging from 86% - 95% against uropathogens (
18,
19). In this study, the frequency of MDR microorganisms to two or more drugs was found in 88.7% of the cases, whereas previous studies reported a lesser rate of MDR bacterial isolates (
20). This high MDR in the present study might be due to improper prescription of antibiotics, epidemic misuse of antimicrobials, self-prescription of antibiotics, and the lack of knowledge about drug resistance in our country.
Acinetobacter baumannii was the most prevalent pathogen that belonged to MDR and XDR patterns in 69.1% of cases.
E. coli and
K. pneumonia showed similar MDR patterns in 35.2% of the cases.
Another significant finding of our study was that trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (85.1%) and ciprofloxacin (68%) against
E. coli exceeded the recommended local resistance level for empirical therapy (about < 20% and < 10%, respectively) (
21)).
Acinetobacter baumannii was the most resistant uropathogen in our study and showed 100% resistance rates against beta-lactam, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and carbapenems. Significant morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospitalization, need for intensive care unit admissions, and increased health care costs were found in our patients. We investigated the presence of ESBL-producing uropathogens throughout the study that included 10.2% of the total cases. Overall,
E. coli species accounted for about 1.1% of ESBL production, whereas
K. pneumonia accounted for about 20.8%.
Klebsiella pneumonia had higher antimicrobial resistance compared with
E. coli regarding ESBL production. High antimicrobial resistance to cephalosporins (94.1%) and fluoroquinolones (82.9%) in ESBL-producing isolates was noted in our study and has also been reported in previous studies.
In all urine cultures,
P. aeruginosa showed growth in 3.9% of the cases, and
Pseudomonas was 100% resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, and cefepime. Also, was found 21-53.8% resistance rate against piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, imipenem, and ceftazidime that is in contrast to a study conducted in India by Manjunath et al. (
15). Interestingly, fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin showed a 0% resistance rate against
Pseudomonas.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa revealed a 29.5% MDR pattern.
Cedecea lapagei is a very rare pathogen of UTIs and is extensively resistant to the ESBL antibiotics and ESBL inhibitors that was found in our study for the first time. Fortunately, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole showed a higher sensitivity rate against pathogens. Although the pattern and distribution of uropathogens are different in countries, a continuous assessment for the changing trends of antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance toward uropathogens is indispensable.
5.1. Conclusions
We reported increased trends of antimicrobial resistance in trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (85.1%) and fluoroquinolones (61%) against E. coli that was higher than the recommended local resistance level for empirical therapy (< 20% and < 10%, respectively). We also suggest using fosfomycin, and nitrofurantoin for UTI empiric treatment, and other antibiotics should be prescribed carefully. Changes in the pattern of antimicrobial resistance are related to increased morbidity, unnecessary hospital admissions, prolonged hospital stay, and high healthcare costs.