Two investigators (CF Li and SS Liu) independently extracted data from eligible studies. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus. For each study, the following information was extracted from each eligible study: the name of the first author, the year of publication, the place of study conduction, the patient age, gender, publication language, the number of cases and controls, serum CK-18 M30 levels in the case and control group, and the detection method of CK-18 M30 in each study. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of studies enrolled in our meta-analysis (
23). The NOS is composed of eight questions with nine possible points that included three aspects: (I) subjects selection: 0 - 4; (II) comparability in subjects: 0 - 2 and; (III) ascertainment for the exposure: 0 - 3. In this meta-analysis, studies receiving 6 or higher scores were regarded as high-quality studies. The heterogeneity test was conducted among these studies using Q-test (P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant) and I
2 index. A value of 25% - 50% for I
2 indicates a low degree of heterogeneity, a value of 50% - 75% indicates a moderate heterogeneity, and a value of > 75% indicates a high heterogeneity. When the I
2 value was > 50%, a random-effects model was used to pool the data; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was selected (
20). The association between serum CK-18 M30 levels and CHB was estimated by the standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate the source of heterogeneity by removing a study each time to assess the stability of our results. P < 0.05 was considered statistically difference. The Funnel plot was used to evaluate the possible publication bias using the Begg’s test; P < 0.05 represented the significant asymmetry of the funnel plot. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 12.0 (Stata Corporation, Texas, US).