Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores

Author(s):
MM TariqMM Tariq1, S KhubaibS Khubaib1, AB ImranAB Imran1, Muhammad  Ibrahim Muhammad Ibrahim 2,*
1Institute of Allied Health Sciences, FMH-College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
2School of Physiotherapy, Mayo Hospital KEMU/ GDS College, Lahore, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Muhammad Ibrahim , School of Physiotherapy, Mayo Hospital KEMU/ GDS College, Lahore, Pakistan, Tel: +92-3004668681, E-mail: Email: [email protected]

International Journal of Cancer Management:Vol. 4, issue 1; e80723
Published online:Mar 30, 2011
Article type:Research Article
Received:Sep 28, 2010
Accepted:Dec 04, 2010
How to Cite:Tariq M, Khubaib S, Imran A, Ibrahim M. Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores. Int J Cancer Manag. 2011;4(1):e80723. doi:

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is third order malignancy in women among other malignancies. Various studies showed that incidence of breast cancer can be lower down by early detection of breast cancer. Mammographic screening is considered more effective modality in detecting early stage breast cancer in women who are at elevated risk for breast cancer. The aim of this study is to report the results of mammographic screening of women based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast cancer.

Methods: Five hundred four women aged >40 years with no history of breast cancer, no complaints of breast symptoms during any self or clinical examination were underwent breast cancer screening using MAMMOMATE 1000 (Siemens). Descriptive analysis is performed for imaging finding and risk factors.

Results: The mean age of 504 women was 51±9.18 years. No family history of breast cancer was present in 418 women (82.9%: 95% CI, 79.4-86.1%). No cancer (negative & benign) was found in 469 women (93.1%: 95% CI, 90.47- 95.12%) with R1/R2 scores. For breast imaging scores, 71.62% of all women were R1, 21.42% were R2, 2.38% were R3 while 4.58% were R4 and above. No association (P>0.05) was found between BI-RADS imaging scores and risk factors.

Conclusion: In spite of low prevalence of breast cancer in our participants, still there is a need to educate the women at country level about the risk of breast cancer and significance of screening as a tool of early detection of breast cancer.

Fulltext

The Full text is available in PDF.

Copyright

© 2011, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

12
Apr
2017

Future Outcome of Sonography BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions

Afsaneh Alikhassi

Alikhassi A. Future Outcome of Sonography BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e47968. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.47968

10
Mar
2018
Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Nasrin Ahmadinejad,
Maryam Jafari,
Maryam Rahmani,
Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari,
Madjid Shakiba

Ahmadinejad N, Jafari M, Rahmani M, Rezaei-Kalantari K, Shakiba M. Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association. I J Radiol. 2018;15(2):e14013. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.14013

15
Apr
2022
Iran J Radiol

The Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Made Easy

Arvin Arian,
Konstantinos Dinas,
Georgios Chrysostomos Pratilas,
Sadaf Alipour

Arian A, Dinas K, Pratilas GC, Alipour S. The Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Made Easy. I J Radiol. 2022;19(1):e121155. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-121155

11
Oct
2021
Iran J Radiol

Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?

Zeynep Fatma Arslan,
Aysegul Altunkeser,
Nergis Aksoy,
Muslu Kazım Korez,
Ethem Omeroglu

Arslan ZF, Altunkeser A, Aksoy N, Korez MK, Omeroglu E. Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?. I J Radiol. 2021;18(4):e113845. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.113845

30
Sep
2009

Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography  

Ali Reza Ehsanbakhsh,
F. Sailanian Toosi,
N. Khorashadizadeh

Ehsanbakhsh AR, Sailanian Toosi F, Khorashadizadeh N. Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography  . I J Radiol. 2009;6(3):e78959. doi:

Download PDF172.44 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles