Outlines

Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography  

Author(s):
Ali Reza EhsanbakhshAli Reza Ehsanbakhsh1,*, F. Sailanian ToosiF. Sailanian Toosi2, N. KhorashadizadehN. Khorashadizadeh2
1Department of Radiology, ValieAsr Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2Department of Radiology, Valie-Asr Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Ali Reza Ehsanbakhsh, Department of Radiology, ValieAsr Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran, Tel: +98561-444-3001, Fax: +98561-223-3427 Email: [email protected]

IJ Radiology:Vol. 6, issue 3; e78959
Published online:Sep 30, 2009
Article type:Research Article
Received:Dec 28, 2008
Accepted:May 05, 2009
How to Cite:Ehsanbakhsh AR, Sailanian Toosi F, Khorashadizadeh N. Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography  . I J Radiol. 2009;6(3):e78959. doi:

Fulltext

The authors' name, abstract and full text are available in PDF

Copyright

© 2009, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

30
Mar
2011

Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores

MM Tariq,
S Khubaib,
AB Imran,
Muhammad Ibrahim

Tariq M, Khubaib S, Imran A, Ibrahim M. Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores. Int J Cancer Manag. 2011;4(1):e80723. doi:

10
Mar
2018
Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Nasrin Ahmadinejad,
Maryam Jafari,
Maryam Rahmani,
Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari,
Madjid Shakiba

Ahmadinejad N, Jafari M, Rahmani M, Rezaei-Kalantari K, Shakiba M. Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association. I J Radiol. 2018;15(2):e14013. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.14013

12
Apr
2017

Weight of Different Descriptors of Mammography

Masoumeh Gity

Gity M. Weight of Different Descriptors of Mammography. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e48370. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48370

11
Oct
2021
Iran J Radiol

Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?

Zeynep Fatma Arslan,
Aysegul Altunkeser,
Nergis Aksoy,
Muslu Kazım Korez,
Ethem Omeroglu

Arslan ZF, Altunkeser A, Aksoy N, Korez MK, Omeroglu E. Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?. I J Radiol. 2021;18(4):e113845. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.113845

12
Apr
2017

Future Outcome of Sonography BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions

Afsaneh Alikhassi

Alikhassi A. Future Outcome of Sonography BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e47968. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.47968

Download PDF303.76 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles