Cover image of the article: Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography

Image Credit:I J Radiol

Outline

Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography  

Authors

Ali Reza Ehsanbakhsh1,*, F. Sailanian Toosi2, N. Khorashadizadeh2
1Department of Radiology, ValieAsr Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2Department of Radiology, Valie-Asr Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Ali Reza Ehsanbakhsh, Department of Radiology, ValieAsr Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran, Tel: +98561-444-3001, Fax: +98561-223-3427 Email: a.r.ehsanbakhsh@gmail.com

Iranian Journal of Radiology:Vol. 6, issue 3; e78959
Published online:Sep 30, 2009
Article type:Research Article
Received:Dec 28, 2008
Accepted:May 05, 2009
How to Cite:Ehsanbakhsh AR, Sailanian Toosi F, Khorashadizadeh N. Different BIRADS Categories in Screening and Diagnostic Mammography  . I J Radiol. 2009;6(3):e78959. doi:

Fulltext

The authors' name, abstract and full text are available in PDF

Copyright

© 2009, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

30
Mar
2011
Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores

Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores

MM Tariq,
S Khubaib,
AB Imran,
Muhammad Ibrahim

Tariq M, Khubaib S, Imran A, Ibrahim M. Screening Mammography for Breast Cancer in Women Using Bi‐RADS Scores. Int J Cancer Manag. 2011;4(1):e80723. doi:

10
Mar
2018
Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association

Nasrin Ahmadinejad,
Maryam Jafari,
Maryam Rahmani,
Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari,
Madjid Shakiba

Ahmadinejad N, Jafari M, Rahmani M, Rezaei-Kalantari K, Shakiba M. Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing BI-RADS 5th Edition Descriptors with the BI-RADS 4th Edition and Pathologic Association. I J Radiol. 2018;15(2):e14013. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.14013

12
Apr
2017

Weight of Different Descriptors of Mammography

Masoumeh Gity

Gity M. Weight of Different Descriptors of Mammography. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e48370. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48370

11
Oct
2021
Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?

Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?

Zeynep Fatma Arslan,
Aysegul Altunkeser,
Nergis Aksoy,
Muslu Kazım Korez,
Ethem Omeroglu

Arslan ZF, Altunkeser A, Aksoy N, Korez MK, Omeroglu E. Which Modality Should Be Integrated to Increase the Diagnostic Efficiency of BI-RADS 0, 3, and 4 Lesions? Ultrasonography or Digital Breast Tomosynthesis?. I J Radiol. 2021;18(4):e113845. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.113845

12
Apr
2017

Future Outcome of Sonography BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions

Afsaneh Alikhassi

Alikhassi A. Future Outcome of Sonography BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e47968. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.47968

More by these authors

Ali Reza EhsanbakhshPubMedScholar
F. Sailanian ToosiPubMedScholar
N. KhorashadizadehPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics