Materials
1-Tetralone [1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenone], Cyclohexanone, Piperidine, bromo benzene, magnesium turning, diethyl ether, 3-bromo anizole and all other chemicals, were supplied from Merck Chemical Co. (Darmstadt, Germany). Melting points (uncorrected) were determined using a digital electrothermal melting point apparatus (model 9100, Electrothermal Engineering Ltd., Essex, UK). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 300 MHz (model AMX, Karlsruhe, Germany) spectrometer (internal reference: TMS). IR spectra were recorded on a Thermo Nicolet FT-IR (model Nexus-870, Nicolet Instrument Corp, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.) spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies 5973, Mass Selective Detector (MSD) spectrometer (Wilmington, USA). Chromatographic column separations were performed over Acros silica gel (No.7631-86-9 particle size 35-70 micrometer, Geel, Belgium). Adult female Wistar rats (Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran), weighing 250 -300 g were used for pharmacological testing.
Methods
Synthesis of compounds (Figure 1, 2) (1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl) piperidine (PCP) I
This compound was prepared according to reported method (
22) from 1-piperidinocy-clohexanecarbonitrile (IV) and phenyl magnesium bromide. The hydrochloride salt was prepared using 2-propanol and HCl and was recrystallized from 2-propanol (
22).
1-Piperidinotetralylcarbonitrile V
To a solution, containing 0.582 g (0.0068 mol) of piperidine in 0.253 g HCl (37%) and 1.36 g cold water, 1 g (0.0068 mol) 1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydro-1-naphtalenone (1-tetralone) was added. Then 0.465 g KCN in 1.02 mL water, 50 mL ethanol and 0.1 g tetra-n-buthylammonium bromide (0.0003 mol) were added and stirred in ambient temperature (25˚ C). The progress of reaction was controlled by TLC (7:3 ethyl acetate: n-Hexane). After one week no additional progress was observed and so the reaction was performed with chloroform (75 mL, 3 times). Then organic layer was separated, dried and concentrated. The oily residue obtained, was passed through a silica gel column using ethyl acetate: hexane (7:3) as the eluent to afford 1.13 g of V (69 % yield).
IR (KBr): 3066, 2941, 2560, 1454, 1436, 1324, 1287, 1225, 764 cm-1.
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 1.56 (6H, b, β and γ H of piperidine ring), 1.68 (2H, b, β H of cyclohexane ring), 1.85 (2H, b, α H of cyclohexane ring), 2.13 ( 4H, b, α H of piperidine ring), 2.74 ( 2H, b, γ H of cyclohexane ring), 6.82-6.95 (8H, m, ArH).
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 25.4, 26.2, 26.8, 31, 37.9, 46.7, 52.7, 117.7, 125.5, 128.1 and 139.2.
MS: m/z (regulatory intensity): 240 [M]+ (76), 241 [M+ H]+(15).
1-[1-(3-methoxyphenyl) (tetralyl)] Piperidine III
A solution containing 4 g (0.016 mol) of nitrile compound (V) in 10 mL of dry THF was added to a refluxing solution of (3-methoxylphenyl) magnesium bromide (Grignard reagent) (prepared from 24.77 g 3-bromoanisole and 3.075 g of Mg in 17 mL of dry ether), refluxed for 5 additional h in 65-67 oC, left overnight at ambient temperature (25 oC) and then poured into ice-NH4Cl. The organic layer was separated and washed with water and the base was neutralized with 10% H2SO4, washed with 20% NaOH, re-extracted with n-Hexane, dried and concentrated. The obtained oily residue was obtained, which was passed through a silica gel column using ethyl acetate: hexane (7:3) as the eluent to afford 2.28 g of III (42 % yield).
The hydrochloride salt of III was prepared using 2-propanol and HCl and was recrystallized from 2-propanol as an oily compound.
IR (KBr): 3066, 2941, 1602, 1483, 1454, 1436, 1324, 1287, 1225, 764 cm-1.
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 1.51 (6H, b, β and γ H of piperidine ring), 1.62 (2H, b, β H of cyclohexane ring), 1.95 (4H, b, α H of cyclohexane ring), 2.24 (4H, b, α H of piperidine ring), 2.85 (2H, b, γ H of cyclohexane ring), 3.73 (3H, S, -OCH3), 6.93-7.01 (8H, m, ArH).
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 26.2, 27.5, 31.8, 44.8, 47.4, 56, 63, 111.6, 114, 120.2, 120.7, 125.8, 126.2, 128.8, 130, 139.3, 142.8, 144, 162.5.
MS: m/z (regulatory intensity): 321 [M]+ (100), 322 [M+ H]+(7).
Pharmacological methods
Adult female Wistar rats (Pasteur Institute, Tehran), weighing 250-300 g at the begining of the experiment were randomly housed; three to four per cage, in a temperature-controlled colony room under light/dark cycle. Animals were given free access to water and standard laboratory rat chow (Pars Company, Tehran, Iran). All behavioral experiments were carried out between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. under normal room light at 25 °C. All animals were injected by one of the investigator and evaluated by another. This study was carried out in accordance guidelines the policies provided in the guide for the care and use of Laboratory Animals (NIH) and those of the Research Council of Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tail immersion test
Acute thermal pain is modeled by the tail immersion test (
23-
29). Two, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 min after an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of drugs (6 mg/kg (
8,
9,
15) which is under LD
50 dosage limit of the drugs (
9) ) (I, II, III) or an equivalent volume of saline (control), the rats (n = 7-9 in each group) were housed in an animal restrainer. Then, the terminal 5 cm of their tails were first submerged into room temperature water (22~24 °C) to check for an aversion to water and afterwards immersed in 52 °C water. The reaction time between immersing the tail and its removal out of the heated water was measured. A cut-off latency of 20 sec was employed to avoid damaging the tail.
Formalin test
Formalin test introduced by Dubuisson and Dennis (
30) was used in our experiments. In this method, formaldehyde solution (50 μl, 2.5%) was injected subcutaneously into the plantar surface of hind paw. The animal was then placed in a plexiglass chamber (30×30×30 cm
3) with a mirror at 45
o angle underneath, for accurate observation. In the treatment groups, the drugs (ketamine, PCP and PCP-CH
3-tetralyl (III)) were administrated intraperitoneally 30 min prior to the formaldehyde injection. Prior to experiment, all animals were brought to the test chamber 5 times with 5 min interval in order to adapt them to the environment. The behavioral pain reactions due to formalin injection were detected and recorded for 1 h. The first 15 min, post-formalin injection is known as the early (I) or acute phase, and the period between 15-60 min is considered the second (II) or chronic phase. However, the chronic phase could be divided to initial (15-40 min) and late (40-60 min) periods.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as means ± SEM. The mean latency of tail withdrawal (s) in tail immersion test and pain scores of formalin test in different groups was compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. We considered the probability of p < 0.05 as a significant difference.